summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/68/da09d223ad8e214adcc8007f3940e048ed154f
blob: 8dc4087b1fac6aeb450292290104c291cb6416e3 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <wtogami@gmail.com>) id 1WJOdp-0005Dz-Oz
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:42:21 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.213.46 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.213.46; envelope-from=wtogami@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-yh0-f46.google.com; 
Received: from mail-yh0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1WJOdn-0000kb-VV
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:42:21 +0000
Received: by mail-yh0-f46.google.com with SMTP id v1so748864yhn.19
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Fri, 28 Feb 2014 06:42:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.231.101 with SMTP id k95mr3513234yhq.34.1393598534461;
	Fri, 28 Feb 2014 06:42:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.170.58.146 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 06:42:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20140228052523.GO3180@nl.grid.coop>
References: <CAJHLa0PXHY1qisXhN98DMxgp11ouqkzYMBvrTTNOtwX09T1kZg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+s+GJC1FgCW9spkViMPvuWNS84Ys33pj=RP1ZpzBCa++e-iMQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<530B8000.1070801@monetize.io> <20140228052523.GO3180@nl.grid.coop>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 04:42:14 -1000
Message-ID: <CAEz79Po37XkoQ=+kQOTdagVn-vYuqYwotQf58YcgTndaaAmXNw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Warren Togami Jr." <wtogami@gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bfeafd49b2f4504f37871de
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(wtogami[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1WJOdn-0000kb-VV
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On OP_RETURN in upcoming 0.9 release
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:42:21 -0000

--047d7bfeafd49b2f4504f37871de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Troy Benjegerdes <hozer@hozed.org> wrote:

>
> Either the transaction fees are sufficient to pay the cost for whatever
> random junk anyone wants to put there, or they are not, and if they are
> not, then I suggest you re-think the fee structure rather than trying
> to pre-regulate me putting 80 character pithy quotes in the blockhain.
>
>
https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/commit/db4d8e21d99551bef4c807aa1534a074e4b7964d

In one way in particular, the transaction fees per kilobyte completely
failed to account for the actual cost to the network.  If Bitcoin had
adopted a common-sense rule like this, I would have had no reason to join
Litecoin development last year.  This is one of the few economic design
flaws that Satoshi overlooked in the original design.

As much as I personally hate the idea of data storage in the blockchain,
this at least discourages the creation of permanent UTXO.

Warren Togami

--047d7bfeafd49b2f4504f37871de
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Troy Benjegerdes <sp=
an dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:hozer@hozed.org" target=3D"_blank">hoz=
er@hozed.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div=
 class=3D"gmail_quote">
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-=
left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;p=
adding-left:1ex"><br>
Either the transaction fees are sufficient to pay the cost for whatever<br>
random junk anyone wants to put there, or they are not, and if they are<br>
not, then I suggest you re-think the fee structure rather than trying<br>
to pre-regulate me putting 80 character pithy quotes in the blockhain.<br>
<div class=3D""><div class=3D"h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></d=
iv><a href=3D"https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/commit/db4d8e21d=
99551bef4c807aa1534a074e4b7964d">https://github.com/litecoin-project/liteco=
in/commit/db4d8e21d99551bef4c807aa1534a074e4b7964d</a><br>
<div><br></div><div>In one way in particular, the transaction fees per kilo=
byte completely failed to account for the actual cost to the network. =C2=
=A0If Bitcoin had adopted a common-sense rule like this, I would have had n=
o reason to join Litecoin development last year. =C2=A0This is one of the f=
ew economic design flaws that Satoshi overlooked in the original design.</d=
iv>
<div><br></div><div>As much as I personally hate the idea of data storage i=
n the blockchain, this at least discourages the creation of permanent UTXO.=
</div><div><br></div><div>Warren Togami</div></div></div></div>

--047d7bfeafd49b2f4504f37871de--