1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
|
Return-Path: <post@levinkeller.de>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BC2F305
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 16 Aug 2015 16:41:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-la0-f50.google.com (mail-la0-f50.google.com
[209.85.215.50])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 103737D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 16 Aug 2015 16:41:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lalv9 with SMTP id v9so66591977lal.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 16 Aug 2015 09:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:content-type;
bh=7fpLPPrrE7dvt8B7Xe1tOcdifCI2XPZ3dKRzbAeaBgY=;
b=QPYRA3erKsFumDXHtXN0dcNTOo0zNPNQ5ARj5ZiX2kALHn+IIuD62OWqUsJ/igrSBu
4BzI0tUUbo2SyVKXqfIqpgz3LPo1wZT7GONWbSjSDW5bhyxRmO2gM5FargCloLP0J+p1
Xoc1g1T0Oh8fxjZbFUDnP+VjZr/gDt8wyrGHe7IMmGyKMnNKFckHMpO5b9O8z/wG8P89
R1x0lSWo6Jh31GeX4MRRmaEgUPIJrvITjS7v4G429Jj4FCqmB5l0nnfh7vTjWcTIrVNR
khsF+XAdSLUc5RnUkC4bbZSMASJ1kqTjBtTx5U5waPdMBGSBCfJ5+iGzUgmvyXNQWhak
/U2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlzRb7qfqVTcBu97CI6aO42TayFUVoCu2tV1iBkOyW3P74w+bZLejMvLG09tejnigo/NRXX
X-Received: by 10.112.42.172 with SMTP id p12mr51902449lbl.52.1439743276362;
Sun, 16 Aug 2015 09:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Levin Keller <post@levinkeller.de>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 16:41:05 +0000
Message-ID: <CAG86ZOzEnjMw4xam5oUuuvyfoAps=47j418cZcw9BLs-yUCB2g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134d44e8e43ff051d705a23
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Minimum Block Size
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 16:41:18 -0000
--001a1134d44e8e43ff051d705a23
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hey everyone,
as with the current "max block size" debate I was wondering: Is anyone here
in favor of a minimum block size (say 2 MB or so)? If so I would be
interested in an exchange (maybe off-list) of ideas. I am in favor of a
lower limit and am giving it quite a bit of thought at the moment.
Cheers
Levin
--001a1134d44e8e43ff051d705a23
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">Hey everyone,<div><br></div><div>as with the current "=
;max block size" debate I was wondering: Is anyone here in favor of a =
minimum block size (say 2 MB or so)? If so I would be interested in an exch=
ange (maybe off-list) of ideas. I am in favor of a lower limit and am givin=
g it quite a bit of thought at the moment.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers<=
/div><div><br></div><div>Levin</div></div>
--001a1134d44e8e43ff051d705a23--
|
