blob: 7020ba4f45bbfe127bd5482e1e70e276d2bff9e3 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <mark@monetize.io>) id 1WXvGi-0007Ax-E0
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 09 Apr 2014 16:22:32 +0000
Received: from mail-pb0-f51.google.com ([209.85.160.51])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1WXvGh-0006T9-8N
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 09 Apr 2014 16:22:32 +0000
Received: by mail-pb0-f51.google.com with SMTP id uo5so2693668pbc.24
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Wed, 09 Apr 2014 09:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent
:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=ypGWXKnUh2KOXEzkmig19kM35am5uAltKN+ugDbZEB0=;
b=L7QmzCLjnxn9vl8RHqZ0uLan3yLAIHLXWEByHiWbevO+Xk06sU4EwIU2KQXmNKJ0dz
WPkW8EGswIECg3cZFkCEjc+7Q7Poa8XgT3Gt5/ceLz9SzOD5NqPb2S9I+IQK8Cu8n39R
gTlnfdy7CNCBhPeGQnEBvfw2p4Ew0EMuGn1NZDCSoX/DElPrIaqPJtooHEnSQyyGTe4O
DEQeOi321N1Ymo+sERKnFQOTcShjGR1au7Ez937fmobbsIrQ5VvdvMgyl/6HIvZwH88l
dcugqth8dO2Pql1+YvTlMtFSK9SjpWexEYmDtt8adNLeYvgcI/O71tMBKQj1OpNatnXn
0WAw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkffaaYoPRSTzicYEfmnYL6R7f7dVkY91YJsUESFLbFTTUeV1Z3e2nKMdFZcvCVUD42xbiB
X-Received: by 10.68.129.137 with SMTP id nw9mr13099016pbb.121.1397060544738;
Wed, 09 Apr 2014 09:22:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.127.221] (50-0-36-93.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net.
[50.0.36.93]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
tf10sm3449364pbc.70.2014.04.09.09.22.22
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Wed, 09 Apr 2014 09:22:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53456B99.9010207@monetize.io>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 08:47:37 -0700
From: Mark Friedenbach <mark@monetize.io>
Organization: Monetize.io Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <CA+s+GJCn9U2kmyMH6w3o+m99NCfO0ws=SccvGBYJv07WVuF=eA@mail.gmail.com> <CAADm4BCEFCiOpNzUThPPHUamP2256izU8pwD3nerLCxks0wENA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAS2fgTx40XSLhiygnJMrSbOC=iJ2YMVLNK7-AMt3ifvAHDZUA@mail.gmail.com>
<E9BAD633-3B6A-4A2C-AA06-DB591973DF66@bitsofproof.com>
In-Reply-To: <E9BAD633-3B6A-4A2C-AA06-DB591973DF66@bitsofproof.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1WXvGh-0006T9-8N
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoind-in-background mode for SPV
wallets
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 16:22:32 -0000
On 04/09/2014 09:09 AM, Tamas Blummer wrote:
> Yes, SPV is a sufficient API to a trusted node to build sophisticated
> features not offered by the core.
> SPV clients of the border router will build their own archive and
> indices based on their interest of the chain therefore the
> border router core does not need to store (and process) anything not
> needed for consensus, its memory
> or disk footprint would be as low as an optimal storage of UTXO.
Storing zero full blocks does nothing to aid the network.
|
