1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
|
Return-Path: <bnagaev@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C0EAC0037
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 29 Dec 2023 19:03:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370338378A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 29 Dec 2023 19:03:42 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 370338378A
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=JhrMF94t
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 4AQMfnX7I0rz
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 29 Dec 2023 19:03:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-il1-x12a.google.com (mail-il1-x12a.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12a])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85F8F83D56
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 29 Dec 2023 19:02:31 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 85F8F83D56
Received: by mail-il1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id
e9e14a558f8ab-35ff53a78a3so16432635ab.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 29 Dec 2023 11:02:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1703876550; x=1704481350;
darn=lists.linuxfoundation.org;
h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from
:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date
:message-id:reply-to;
bh=sMzl9jrU/pp7BE6nEsgcfPhMFwhO2pe9bPktI5uVgbk=;
b=JhrMF94tPzBfiD7djf7QgL4JBBO5cbaR0ZVc8xZpeaf3fJI9m7EAqEZ6p6v34qZK/a
yz6ZR5vY+7L2daqfQ8F2y/84b4tTXrs0vLcrWCdLTRBVF267pqCoyJAb3fBrwqa4wxXq
eD3lBp5L7AqT0ignnXtXXlZi8vd3R29HHIcpbuHJbUe70nqxlsVlgW1s5dl/99TASCAb
gk8r5FCxNJlh46kjftwZYAIgVc7WtGwI84CMzY8vN7wdLBh08sFNgnYYgluxVnb1wh0a
h02yylcZ/3MQr6lAG8RdT4HhwU/P6TTEyaNXBicB2mIJc16a9VYZ373I+DvZIwx/+4m3
XOtA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1703876550; x=1704481350;
h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from
:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=sMzl9jrU/pp7BE6nEsgcfPhMFwhO2pe9bPktI5uVgbk=;
b=tTdHM+aVGv+8MFzXuVSv8ZnAMducNbts06nd1KchXoOGKr4knxbUWL8AjKxlbiWPOg
WyqzdfS5aAyJOP9WIijA+/B9eSZxHtwyMdLL/8unROm/y4jrIBFR3mobNqakDNt7YSZ1
uSGjlBrR8hXndpbWLSfkpsF74o7yD/GdpuRLblFlD+MDO10K4mQE7ciRRmoggbuJWSv8
T255rvD0qA7X+zq9g4VMRNp2n4TL93b7/lVLIrmFoF9sAcUHDZkFe1EjsoWJ89LrmeAp
CGgIV+scdP34q6sJgw7AUGcLqssCXAYTS0PeKBeoq4YKY+D9Mz24wWuMHTHjy3/ZoRec
+wrg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwJTLpcOxHPsQCOr70ggxq18eKcs6HnFIhRlobsHbn/QOkA6+zd
KLbDYGZpjLDCHtDQGQ3E4dpJjkBie5aNY1ObSKw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFpx6AqmyIjDtYxUQGS8EySWA1l+u9WqoE/EvEXMit/nmdkvD2mx0A0iE+EJ7BsBV6t0kxqE21i3WIYJn/ly4Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:17cd:b0:360:fa:2a6a with SMTP id
z13-20020a056e0217cd00b0036000fa2a6amr9563912ilu.36.1703876550351; Fri, 29
Dec 2023 11:02:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABHetKwan91zqm=0y=_84vG7ffveWTPYONZP_hLQx5o40iAnuQ@mail.gmail.com>
<Y9PPvBiWOXpBefmD@camus> <980df778-cc94-4f98-8eb1-cbb321883369@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <980df778-cc94-4f98-8eb1-cbb321883369@gmail.com>
From: Nagaev Boris <bnagaev@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 16:01:52 -0300
Message-ID: <CAFC_Vt7r_HA73UBmDdYsjxMirLfPb3K+3do_NwS-2o=Jsmw0gA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Tonoski <gregtonoski@gmail.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 15:58:26 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 19:03:42 -0000
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 1:34=E2=80=AFPM Greg Tonoski via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> There is significant difference when storing data as dummy signatures
> (or OP_RETURN) which is much more expensive than (discounted) witness.
> Witness would not have been chosen as the storage of arbitrary data if
> it cost as much as alternatives, e.g. OP_RETURN.
Hi Greg!
How about storing data in multisig signatures? Make a 1/n multisig and
store the data in (n-1) dummy public keys. It is stored in witness and
is quite efficient and hard to filter out only if together with
legitimate multisigs.
Another smart place for hidden data is Merkle proof in Taproot. The
depth is limited to 128 levels, so put 1 valid leaf and add data to
127 fake elements to calculate the Merkle root.
I think there are more ways like this. If the current place is banned,
they can always waste money in other parts of bitcoin transactions. It
is impossible to stop someone who can afford to waste money from doing
it. (Well, it is, but not in a decentralized voluntary way of
Bitcoin.) My approach is just to wait for them to run out of money and
use Lightning Network for payments meanwhile.
--=20
Best regards,
Boris Nagaev
|
