1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
|
Return-Path: <eric@voskuil.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF702514
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:07:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com (mail-pa0-f43.google.com
[209.85.220.43])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A0F2161
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:07:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pachj5 with SMTP id hj5so146510307pac.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type;
bh=8dEKtSd97grNfSSRB/W126cQsDD+z+ZsWCJccsCYU6M=;
b=hFpWtuk4TsLGu6cfGwHhPFnFWkgwE6Qf+qRLehtOuwba1x/HutHZo3F9tiIY/m/aLR
79ri6zca08MlBWZl1B6uc6BjOf4fb/YqQfNSXv3FAGEsHGw8rBsN34NJaNUkTW4EwAX5
fRG07uxGJSud/s8KPiAXgu6dFJzozJmq9yscaeBbYAdyGZ/0O/jQ0XskYWZCK6TMn0ri
WtjEm8U95Oy+VH4XQmLvh50zqwQqHWTGAA3LcQJptw6s6A5I811VtIsbwVgs6ni1X+tX
YbhzUdVkK6HpDJbqzzFA4rPTSiyMC1RVuZxT03LiDWbSrSBKStATsgO2jbo6sAxyjd8U
C8+A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlY3c8isl49419kuEeThV4f6zXlw3hDRkSfuu++VRClci55X8oWb7wxpnHQFH3ldJJWvVjN
X-Received: by 10.70.23.196 with SMTP id o4mr11652650pdf.164.1437610023816;
Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.14] (c-67-161-88-20.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [67.161.88.20])
by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
t2sm5305803pdo.81.2015.07.22.17.07.02
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55B03032.5020306@voskuil.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:07:14 -0700
From: Eric Voskuil <eric@voskuil.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gb <kiwigb@yahoo.com>, Thomas Voegtlin <thomasv@electrum.org>
References: <55AFBBE6.3060702@electrum.org> <1437606706.2688.0.camel@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <1437606706.2688.0.camel@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="6rSgkx4iBlV13SeqcAlb9S1tnpHxrf2CA"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Making Electrum more anonymous
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:07:05 -0000
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--6rSgkx4iBlV13SeqcAlb9S1tnpHxrf2CA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This is a good point. I didn't delve into the specifics of
implementation due to the larger issues that I raised. Libbitcoin Server
uses CurveZMQ, an implementation of CurveCP.
http://curvecp.org
http://curvezmq.org
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Libbitcoin_Server
e
On 07/22/2015 04:11 PM, gb via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Why RSA?
>=20
>>
>> Here is an idea, inspired by TOR, on which I would like to have some
>> feedback: We create an anonymous routing layer between Electrum server=
s
>> and clients.
>>
>> * Each server S publishes a RSA public key, KS
>> * Each client receives a list of available servers and their pubkeys
>> * For each wallet address, addr_i, a client chooses a server S_i, and =
a
>> RSA keypair (K_addr_i, k_addr_i)
>> * The client creates a list of encrypted requests. Each request contai=
ns
>> addr_i and K_addr_i, and is encrypted with the pubkey KS_i of S_i
>> * The client chooses a main server M, and sends the list of encrypted
>> requests to M
>> * M dispatches the client's requests to the corresponding servers S_i
>> (without the client's IP address.)
>> * Each server decrypts the requests it receives, performs the request,=
>> and encrypts the result with K_addr_i
>> * M receives encrypted responses, and forwards them to the client.
>> * The client decrypts the encrypted response with k_addr_i
--6rSgkx4iBlV13SeqcAlb9S1tnpHxrf2CA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVsDAzAAoJEDzYwH8LXOFOoWQH/3rKskYOpSeihm9lP42pDwkX
gJtrVawkwCco5YFhm8E68V9JowXlmajJDeaH+P1Y6ma/Lhq4IBer2tUI+/Sr9KEp
Liwa4TvqEcjAW8wR9frRGIQgxeuJKntFRGSIi5qrDpsJI2eHZCRgWG/hWx7op0I/
K7wZa4OtwfRaVDFFkFH/af9qeFr3oiKiqhdUO6O9zUf7USLb811oxD0JEQtdeG1c
7hqZT0GmU2MSzpd9yPS8se+ob9PvK6VGeHxq7z9McBY8ZqccqhkBQ6sjQBtHn8z3
lBWFudqKRXIHGU/Hw6yx+MY/rA6eNYdwpNQuqF1cW71pAi82g/ss4D7jvWQ7960=
=ooug
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--6rSgkx4iBlV13SeqcAlb9S1tnpHxrf2CA--
|
