summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/66/49f0a99875c66714bc973d7647461b3a740e99
blob: f47ae620803a9b72dcbdd71e715900685e3c87ef (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
Return-Path: <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B48410BD
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sun, 30 Aug 2015 07:44:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC77A1C1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sun, 30 Aug 2015 07:44:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from piha.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.162])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "*.riseup.net",
	Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
	by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B1A9C1B79;
	Sun, 30 Aug 2015 00:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
	t=1440920660; bh=BKNw5QlCNSZMQuHUZBBC1PUsUoQ6YOLDd98ZuzVQzZo=;
	h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=EKou4+yAAxDstbq36TzMKc0K1qd7g0r3XV8brQgij7iKbnEHx66jzj5+cNWbGM5FT
	vPo14/9zAE9y/+jJ/zyVX1v3ho3Q58DF7kC8KloBTggo+lZAYN7cybqd8MiNfU7OaS
	RmWs+QI/8jEIVc2MNRmibKiYmIADlcbiGsS2ap88=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	(Authenticated sender: odinn.cyberguerrilla)
	with ESMTPSA id C8F571418D9
Message-ID: <55E2B452.3090402@riseup.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 00:44:18 -0700
From: odinn <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>, 
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com>
References: <CA+1nnrnybS7u_9F46rEbnsPa1UDCMTau3X6SDahstawPzmXEjg@mail.gmail.com>
	<55D6B653.6050108@riseup.net>
	<CALxbBHWvXjrUeeryArYQkgGT6kY-XpOzm4yUY5TUjC4jz+F0xg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADm_Wcb-M=hxcAvb4JS_AeuGYgjs=Xdyc0o0SR3o9R1xheHv1A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALxbBHWqoK38tn_F3LTKi=6i55rhuZKOy=UDgy3SQr39hm+EGQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALxbBHWqoK38tn_F3LTKi=6i55rhuZKOy=UDgy3SQr39hm+EGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at mx1.riseup.net
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,
	UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Nicolas Dorier <nicolas.dorier@gmail.com>,
	Bitcoin development mailing list <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] RE : Visualizations of Votes
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 07:44:21 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

This is looking very good also (you've already seen it, but just
adding it to thread):

https://data.bitcoinity.org/bitcoin/block_size_votes/7d?c=block_size_vot
es&r=hour&t=bar
(site by Kacper Cieśla (comboy))

On 08/25/2015 01:46 AM, Christian Decker wrote:
> Yes, the two dimensions are orthogonal: BIP 100 support and actual
> size voting. However there seem to be a few pools which simply vote
> to support BIP100, without specifying a desired block size [1],
> hence I started tracking both on the same chart, maybe I'll split
> them into different charts to clarify.
> 
> Regards, Chris
> 
> [1]
> https://blockchain.info/tx/ba1e5d21a340772d637ee5dc0bde8072ad1a7b499ba
241d5bfaae9618749531e
>
>  On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:46 PM Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com 
> <mailto:jgarzik@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> There is a duplicated column.
> 
> BIP 100 voting is /BV\d+/
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Christian Decker via bitcoin-dev 
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org 
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
> 
> I hacked together a simple tracking page for the 'block votes', it
> currently includes the 8MB vote and XT, as well as the /BV\d+/ vote
> for generic size: http://bitcoinstats.com/network/votes/
> 
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 7:25 AM odinn via bitcoin-dev 
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org 
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
> 
> Hello Nicolas,
> 
> On 08/20/2015 08:49 PM, Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>>> A visualization I would like to see would include:
> 
>>> pie graph(s) of what % are voting for (BIP 100, BIP 101,
> 8MB, BIP
>>> sipa
>> etc) based on what's published in blocks.
> 
>> If such a vote existed, I would gladly show the pie on
> BIPxDevs.
>> However there is no standard way for miners to vote
> informally BIP
>> they support.
> 
> What about formal votes? Is there a way to visually have them
> appear in a pie chart as the votes become apparent in blocks?
> 
> I appreciate good visualizations and am trying to get a (visual) 
> comparison of the votes on these competing proposals.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing
>> list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing
> list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org 
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> 
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing
> list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org 
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> 
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
> 
> 

- -- 
http://abis.io ~
"a protocol concept to enable decentralization
and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good"
https://keybase.io/odinn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV4rRSAAoJEGxwq/inSG8C7gIIALRgWbwf447+B202oUOmtGW6
1CVBJX415PyOmBLqbKBgIRLhQm3rOa0WRcjYejHM2PJLz2XIAyLouOoxiy+rcwX4
yIqEX33El+evgDpFZPjHUYq15mMtP0+jnzwZvyYrCP41m1MUoXwOWDYnf8X+q4yb
h2eiApU4fRJmzDYWWzVmoWTYFEzjmNW95vSOTSCFxuvx2A6227vyJI1irQ9EDi7+
UVdvNqTIXTmNDDJBmIsUeWkSe7fAkgyejxD2S08zEUuLR8w3S+9JYJ0rDTMkl4PR
EEnuL1M34WMuT7uQIjeQ/5L3voMefKAjCcwiX/lvk2G+YKXXhQhqNy1uyPfJgyI=
=YUJa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----