1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9A9C0033
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:10:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664E26F9FA
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:10:49 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 664E26F9FA
Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key,
unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=FxSYV5X1
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_FAIL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id rHPayIND2lRX
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:10:48 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 00:08:18 by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 15B1F60AE1
Received: from new3-smtp.messagingengine.com (new3-smtp.messagingengine.com
[66.111.4.229])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15B1F60AE1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:10:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46])
by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D203758012B;
Fri, 14 Oct 2022 11:02:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163])
by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 14 Oct 2022 11:02:26 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id
:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id
:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to
:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=
fm3; t=1665759746; x=1665766946; bh=7RHANW8OPwqg77Na8KuRcR2usylm
Vsw6Z0KRpr0hSJc=; b=FxSYV5X1Jl9J7POeH1DZg48iFzyMgSOWEMwtHHHsV8GA
PRHVYfXe3PgYU4xKjhok4FbI3BQiryP0oZD57J4Mni7bsVzHbAExFeOkBFs58z7f
AKkVyg8toLNaWZHSUf8f5ePaQFghoL2Z1d9tx5D+2K43j6N1qRezOibRe5E2YXhY
skcdhBBBGITX5pMyX8pIDKlCjPjfETqLu5kgTm/ddxCnPNOWM/LQBoTUzEtJEMMV
NHR1udgjUopvt7JHR2yyhtp6veEaTYkl+1XqajSm/AzOPzy4n02ndJR2vZUOMyzZ
uc+977e1vHOs01PG2HRrLea47uaNp+KrljuCFXIKXA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:AnpJYx8ULHhUnU-X-w_WxBzxGxFxkZTuXvI6LxKa4jw8Tg0EZG1mQA>
<xme:AnpJY1uHYnvcea5SNisljBMKzgT4I5bIMBflgM2tipurzyfbcCJhVsZFfx8qDNLrI
z710-yIeBRMGJbBgI4>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:AnpJY_C707chT3DjKnIUP8IqkWPcJGW5z_cKTVLLxi_LNEiF_C6FeyVQVw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfeekvddgkeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehgtd
erredttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefrvghtvghrucfvohguugcuoehpvghtvgesphgvthgvrhht
ohguugdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptddtgedtffetueekfffhffekkeeihf
etuddvteejueejffegveeghfduteejhfevnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtgho
mhdpphgvthgvrhhtohguugdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrh
grmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehpvghtvgesphgvthgvrhhtohguugdrohhrgh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:AnpJY1cRJCYY9aU7hOkU6LyjmNI_l4IvIt7Yy4HNGUzpoXsSO2ev-Q>
<xmx:AnpJY2NQZ0-NCDCBPcu7gAGoCq0Uy8y7jkwxLFWNL17hoK68hZ2dFw>
<xmx:AnpJY3nIYBdHmdKv5PWB405rY6J_eqvQjegv1mSom7YN5_uPxepStQ>
<xmx:AnpJYzpkIiaddU5qSH8zU43z_festjmb1rZqgm3WKrUbNlS-7NccnA>
Feedback-ID: i525146e8:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri,
14 Oct 2022 11:02:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 4D7565F86C; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 11:02:25 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 11:02:25 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: alicexbt <alicexbt@protonmail.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <Y0l6AdvMfQdRA+mo@petertodd.org>
References: <CAKiPDnTPyduCm2Db0v51m_hbCSGbZcUcCwg9=hwJGKeiFeTWBg@mail.gmail.com>
<166567725305.12.6779598172515633768.68724733@dralias.com>
<4f73l5UZxQAv3BB6YIveAjJlp-YdQa7esPYMsiO-OnNX-G8psxzWSX70WDoLuHCv_FUoIkjY-HNQEkyZKQj88tHwOOIksXKn7qdMBxkbpm0=@protonmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2aToqJcxvSypgB7P"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4f73l5UZxQAv3BB6YIveAjJlp-YdQa7esPYMsiO-OnNX-G8psxzWSX70WDoLuHCv_FUoIkjY-HNQEkyZKQj88tHwOOIksXKn7qdMBxkbpm0=@protonmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Opt-in full-RBF] Zero-conf apps in immediate
danger
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:10:49 -0000
--2aToqJcxvSypgB7P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 02:44:04AM +0000, alicexbt via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > Relay of fullrbf transactions works reasonable well
> > already, unless you get unlucky with your selected peers. The only
> > missing piece is a few percent of hashrate that will accept fullrbf
> > replacement transactions.=20
>=20
> I don't believe relay of fullrbf transactions works well right now. The m=
issing piece you mentioned is important and a real need for all full node u=
sers to try fullrbf.
Relay of full-rbf transactions works well right now precisely because a few
implementations exist of preferential rbf peering. I'm personally running f=
our
nodes with it enabled, two using my own custom patches, and another two usi=
ng
ariad's patch:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25600
I haven't seen a lot of non-opt-in doublespends get mined. But I have seen a
few now via my Alice OTS calendar. This can of course increase dramatically=
as
miners turn on full-rbf.
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--2aToqJcxvSypgB7P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=v8m8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--2aToqJcxvSypgB7P--
|
