summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/64/62d25c2fb4538b6212d5ac46e8d3d4cee20601
blob: 8dce59755555eac594c34d05f1e04865ea37ac7b (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <nanotube@gmail.com>) id 1UwZMQ-0003uv-NJ
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:57:46 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.128.169 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.128.169; envelope-from=nanotube@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ve0-f169.google.com; 
Received: from mail-ve0-f169.google.com ([209.85.128.169])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1UwZMO-0006Om-Fs
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:57:46 +0000
Received: by mail-ve0-f169.google.com with SMTP id m1so4734758ves.28
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Tue, 09 Jul 2013 07:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.220.98.68 with SMTP id p4mr16542756vcn.28.1373381858709;
	Tue, 09 Jul 2013 07:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.101] (c-68-81-47-73.hsd1.pa.comcast.net.
	[68.81.47.73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
	ih10sm20642026vdb.1.2013.07.09.07.57.37
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Tue, 09 Jul 2013 07:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51DC24DE.2040801@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 10:57:34 -0400
From: Daniel F <nanotube@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <1372353053.10405.140661249237317.77984E1F@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<CAJHLa0Ncac9Xt-AQBnpghqqpfR-j6Xtd9qVQoUe2dPp0kJvz1A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP0k1HDrJC9DOn6JYiVcaRRXwVwxW7ZPjE9XvfTCHXX6pw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABsx9T3GJN0inGChebJt_dRLpVrPw7BTH8oQo6F4q6yFJaOoCA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP3LGxZ6E+9UWQH+_RN66dfeGzo4+QYACjauKRufpqB2QA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1372605569.4937.140661250186789.39404E47@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<CAKm8k+20z0FkQjnYXjBwUSwY4ncTmMc-LXDH=hF6u55f_gWpkA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+i0-i9tj8w7pNuk7nUBQKdxvizX+6_Ez1VA8OtKJNTqRrYtxg@mail.gmail.com>
	<51DB6548.5070909@lavabit.com>
	<CANEZrP0OZZDtRw_KYJpPkhYhQA75h5yyQRQrw+gxV0hsnc2bbg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1373367371.4283.140661253533454.0D7E544E@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<51DC1761.5080303@gmail.com>
	<CAJHLa0P5D2W_5GH9PGk4wgi2DwsqHjRQkjHZ3uCVwaFNDcPThw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP3CJAdJ12BimW5w9q4q-QgBoRDUnbY-uVc1+s3zbo4ncg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP3CJAdJ12BimW5w9q4q-QgBoRDUnbY-uVc1+s3zbo4ncg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(nanotube[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.2 MISSING_HEADERS        Missing To: header
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1UwZMO-0006Om-Fs
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: MultiBit as default desktop
 client on bitcoin.org
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:57:46 -0000

on 07/09/2013 10:28 AM Mike Hearn said the following:
> SourceForge has a horrible UI and blocks some countries. It also exposes
> us to a large and potentially hackable mirror network. Whilst we're not
> bandwidth constrained on our own servers, let's try and keep using them.

the point was just that "if need be" free capacity is available without
having to throw money at it. until there's no need, doesn't matter.

also hackability (and ui) should be irrelevant for the autoupdate
process (which i presume will do all kinds of checksum and sig
verification). and it's likely the autoupdates that will create very
lumpy download demand.