summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/64/5f7b6f0791c7958fce766bd933203c17fb9446
blob: e9532995a8063dc9f69b38bbdaea9317631803e8 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
Return-Path: <earonesty@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C361413
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:55:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-yb0-f169.google.com (mail-yb0-f169.google.com
	[209.85.213.169])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83387155
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:55:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id e125so1457489ybc.0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 11 Aug 2016 06:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
	:subject:to:cc;
	bh=J9MXK884grA5935TLHIoqUYGcm2Sbg84Ma+Ql4jm/tM=;
	b=WKdDK0PN+QyyRpjUVqjn6O52jN+6pIMSjT3q1RXyG8Kxc86qoSQkyuOVNE5AxM1H5M
	DXql1e1z5LXId9aaV/9nWtpvYYEMqYruBhByKL4zh8Iv7X1wrkB9H9Ece23W0eO3PH+I
	n7iLdDoy0GM2nLTcboX7cVGsW+8zrug2JdDqMnzD0ayjlPYMEAHZnzX+sQ6Q2KCsFx3I
	rRoWAyMJjFh7ud/kIzPnGiwb6ckzBNQ3obMbKosA6IZuF834hZK2RJJE6N4oyqSSUyl0
	aTZQOKL/pyAe+PxM8El+wFQrAiCi75S0tvDPMEue05Irlzlf3fXc1AVZJxYJvCtvZTkP
	JjQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
	:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
	bh=J9MXK884grA5935TLHIoqUYGcm2Sbg84Ma+Ql4jm/tM=;
	b=BqOnmtxkEzFTY7PdSnD049TizTYEG0vNfs0Nz/COlM7CyGOs2dcE58FVH1AH5v6X6/
	V63aAeMPieRkTNZEeri5gHcUSHzBtAnkeANIKr6uhcjAXNHCnipAsRoPCcuAMQZSMRy0
	+XG29M75AcKMViSsLSxw4GwpaVAJvbSFG2VU6P3lsgYdQe5tLIo0VppMqj1mHpTnrRNC
	esnedw8CMlEmB+/+w3LDyEYVsKX8UEEliscWllYbavezzEg0xb17cbIIOysMX4qgImZ0
	ImMSQuMOk8Nr2bamxcaZZlDGVqE/auxyBwWU+/la3X/szGuPcGTU2HqtFtuBL4KMZMZ5
	GGHQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousX3rwsLOFmmWJbCA0ZgfoUjmjQquIPb6x0CrMU11N6nwUf9tG/BF6pic2JPqGYuj8VJomaCHfkerW8nA==
X-Received: by 10.37.210.197 with SMTP id j188mr6292937ybg.52.1470923752801;
	Thu, 11 Aug 2016 06:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: earonesty@gmail.com
Received: by 10.37.88.214 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 06:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBi6mPviRRKysbuuOFKoYoyTufpUO_rJxJdB-8=7KGurYw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL9WuQUUeR3cuUXHxUfBTNJ-+r0iJ-7Z8KRNub0G3NBujnkqcw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABqynxJ3uph-4A+Ynq70CLa2kCCspTRsFWpKo_eP1FmVxZqSwQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALd2G5dERuX2n33MGZJ+mtM8WnvtzZcWDFFUfNFZEGJFkkHLDg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL9WuQUt+CMG2bEX+yv3LrFV7qn-=OSdn02ZxxPQci-3_ykPNQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL9WuQXsbBJ0UwdS+o=UqJCcsebcPa9Ug5A=uNtc6Z+9CNEFPg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAS2fgR-weACn_Ezg8-uZuSH0QT5dfLEFE5WO2VDi0nx8H1e9g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAE-z3OXeJHvjyF_phVh2u9S45_xss=C9ykL=BN=n=BxTx+AbrQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJowKg+yh+PgTE14=+pPUXFdB_AGrsgk3cNSFnTGDYecsxDP5g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFh0iXOLN6B27Fkc=GXo-j3VwA0hkNggCiQOhR35R52yQGwSwg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL9WuQXH8TAKRabPSrZzMzpFBwmujdv-uSXJLeTt9u3H9WAFGw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJowKgK0N9VJZsm4fbZ5VvteUjoQkh9-xhg1yfcD3NRTuFV78Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPg+sBi6mPviRRKysbuuOFKoYoyTufpUO_rJxJdB-8=7KGurYw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:55:51 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: _zkFIwQY-9xkPYeS7ipWeUqqlD0
Message-ID: <CAJowKg+0Oz7+Gdfm=NSO9MqOqSYV8Uo=nOMtkx3CBrsemK+BtQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c065502c70e160539cc1fe0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Number Request: Addresses over Audio
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:55:54 -0000

--94eb2c065502c70e160539cc1fe0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Sorr, I thought there was some BIP for a public seed such that someone can
generate new random addresses, but cannot trivially verify whether an
address was derived from the seed.

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > By sending a public seed,  there's no way for someone to use the
> transmitted
> > address and trace the total amount of payments to it.
>
> Worse. By revealing a public seed, anyone who has seen it (= anyone
> who ever pays you through it) can identity all payments to _any_
> address derived from that seed.
>
> --
> Pieter
>

--94eb2c065502c70e160539cc1fe0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Sorr, I thought there was some BIP for a public seed such =
that someone can generate new random addresses, but cannot trivially verify=
 whether an address was derived from the seed.<br></div><div class=3D"gmail=
_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Pie=
ter Wuille <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:pieter.wuille@gmail.com"=
 target=3D"_blank">pieter.wuille@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockq=
uote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc =
solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D"">On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 7:28 PM, E=
rik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev<br>
&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@li=
sts.<wbr>linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt; By sending a public seed,=C2=A0 there&#39;s no way for someone to use =
the transmitted<br>
&gt; address and trace the total amount of payments to it.<br>
<br>
</span>Worse. By revealing a public seed, anyone who has seen it (=3D anyon=
e<br>
who ever pays you through it) can identity all payments to _any_<br>
address derived from that seed.<br>
<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"><br>
--<br>
Pieter<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>

--94eb2c065502c70e160539cc1fe0--