summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/64/374db83fb5b6081eb65b954f680095d3135393
blob: 9f4eb10772d57ba94c2ecce4aa7b00393fde7757 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
Return-Path: <aymeric@peersm.com>
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::133])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6D9C002B
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat,  4 Feb 2023 23:15:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33650401CA
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat,  4 Feb 2023 23:15:08 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 33650401CA
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id dLIWbutpcYye
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat,  4 Feb 2023 23:15:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org EE1084010E
Received: from smtpout3.mo529.mail-out.ovh.net
 (smtpout3.mo529.mail-out.ovh.net [46.105.54.81])
 by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE1084010E
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat,  4 Feb 2023 23:15:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mxplan6.mail.ovh.net (unknown [10.108.16.173])
 by mo529.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC32720BCA;
 Sat,  4 Feb 2023 23:09:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from peersm.com (37.59.142.97) by DAG6EX2.mxp6.local (172.16.2.52)
 with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
 cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.17; Sun, 5 Feb
 2023 00:09:10 +0100
Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass
 (GARM-97G0024a8c0359-e5f7-4682-84b6-838bcdcd036f,
 0098AF237195B9B300583606E28666A1C7481BE7) smtp.auth=aymeric@peersm.com
X-OVh-ClientIp: 92.184.100.83
To: Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com>
References: <CACrqygAMsO1giYuxm=DZUqfeRjEqGM7msmEnZ-AHws3oA2=aqw@mail.gmail.com>
 <ca8622cb-445e-4258-bbac-b3ee1ce95f4c@protonmail.com>
 <57f780b1-f262-9394-036c-70084320e9cf@peersm.com>
 <CACrqygCNf3Gv8+VjhyqS4GTb3Epo8qXEKGtQB6sqyR6ib44-fA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABE6yHtM2Dqc63_eURSr7dMirJti5sYnqvHj7vQ_Ab9FC_d04g@mail.gmail.com>
 <3d00aacb-585d-f875-784d-34352860d725@peersm.com>
 <CACrqygB_FbsRGWYPSUEFTnP15y94Hmo4JtAuv6bH1D3YtbAw9Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <b292d887-cbd5-165c-de01-793df2b5e8f3@peersm.com>
 <CACrqygAv842ucN7PLYMENXFiSwAZJy2Y+FziJXrWjyCcOXmL3g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Aymeric Vitte <aymeric@peersm.com>
Message-ID: <230265ee-c3f8-dff3-9192-f0c8dc4d913c@peersm.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2023 00:09:02 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CACrqygAv842ucN7PLYMENXFiSwAZJy2Y+FziJXrWjyCcOXmL3g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Originating-IP: [37.59.142.97]
X-ClientProxiedBy: DAG8EX1.mxp6.local (172.16.2.71) To DAG6EX2.mxp6.local
 (172.16.2.52)
X-Ovh-Tracer-GUID: a47f6029-831a-4d01-921e-4d7209d84864
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 16543410282279298013
X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK
X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100
X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudegfedgtdeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfdpvefjgfevmfevgfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecuhedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepuffvfhevhffkffgfgggjtgfgihesthhqredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepteihmhgvrhhitgcugghithhtvgcuoegrhihmvghrihgtsehpvggvrhhsmhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepiefgleegvdfhjefgtdduueetudetkedukeeuudejudehieevhfdvtdevjeehudegnecukfhppeduvdejrddtrddtrddupdefjedrheelrddugedvrdeljeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpeduvdejrddtrddtrddupdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoegrhihmvghrihgtsehpvggvrhhsmhdrtghomheqpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedupdhrtghpthhtohepkhhkrghrrghsrghvvhgrshesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdpsghithgtohhinhdquggvvheslhhishhtshdrlhhinhhugihfohhunhgurghtihhonhdrohhrghdpvehhrhhishhtohhphhgvrhetsehlihhfvgifihhthhgrlhgrtghrihhthidrtghomhdpoffvtefjohhsthepmhhohedvledpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhht
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 04 Feb 2023 23:16:58 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE
 OP_IF OP_PUSH
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2023 23:15:09 -0000

I don't know, what number would you advise? When I made the
bitcoin-transactions nodejs module some years ago the limit (from the
specs) was 512B

It's not a fork, super easy to do

And necessary because bitcoin on ground of I don't know what rule
allowing the IF/ENDIF "unlimited" storage just mimics ethereum for the
worse, and is again quite dubious to use


Le 04/02/2023 =C3=A0 23:18, Christopher Allen a =C3=A9crit :
> 520 because that is a similar limit in taproot? Some multiple of
> hash+signature+metadata to satisfy others (that still might not be
> satisfied by any choice).