1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>) id 1Qm7Gf-0005nT-IB
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:47:33 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bluematt.me
designates 208.79.240.5 as permitted sender)
client-ip=208.79.240.5; envelope-from=bitcoin-list@bluematt.me;
helo=smtpauth.rollernet.us;
Received: from smtpauth.rollernet.us ([208.79.240.5])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.76) id 1Qm7Ge-00016F-Lw
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:47:33 +0000
Received: from smtpauth.rollernet.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtpauth.rollernet.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3930259402C
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bluematt.me (unknown
[IPv6:2001:470:9ff2:2:20c:29ff:fe16:f239])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: @bluematt.me)
by smtpauth.rollernet.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:9ff2:1:2c0:caff:fe33:858b] (unknown
[IPv6:2001:470:9ff2:1:2c0:caff:fe33:858b])
by mail.bluematt.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5CA7B7B0
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:47:22 +0200 (CEST)
From: Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
In-Reply-To: <CAJ1JLtuuUUmrWGScbvYikAY_FOQhWpX5bt1NGp8VkpHk-hHOsQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABsx9T3W=n6VVJfOUqcd52oYvd-5hSwdOJudtVHK4g0bPGpXew@mail.gmail.com>
<1311765274.9830.3.camel@mei>
<CAJNQ0su9Qbi=zMaJA0G77UuHkXBy8k7YLBd4cec=Rc_-FGPBjA@mail.gmail.com>
<201107271028.28057.luke@dashjr.org>
<CAJ1JLtuuUUmrWGScbvYikAY_FOQhWpX5bt1NGp8VkpHk-hHOsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="=-MBdhkbdFTgiYrEr9+pHS"
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:47:22 +0200
Message-ID: <1311785242.2294.50.camel@Desktop666>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2
X-Rollernet-Abuse: Processed by Roller Network Mail Services. Contact
abuse@rollernet.us to report violations. Abuse policy:
http://rollernet.us/abuse.php
X-Rollernet-Submit: Submit ID 5492.4e304111.7cf7.0
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1Qm7Ge-00016F-Lw
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Seeking advice: Encouraging bug-fixing
over new features
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:47:33 -0000
--=-MBdhkbdFTgiYrEr9+pHS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 09:07 -0700, Rick Wesson wrote:
> personally, if the software works better (less bugs) then btc will be
> more valuable. offering bounty is orthorginal to finding the right
> technical lead that will hurd the effort.
>=20
>=20
> put a bounty (salary) on the person to lead the effort, not the bugs
>=20
Gavin leads the effort just fine (when he's not on vacation or in
Australia...) but I do agree with paying him, though I'm not sure how
much time he has to spend on development over PR and other
project-building efforts.
--=-MBdhkbdFTgiYrEr9+pHS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)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=hQzn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-MBdhkbdFTgiYrEr9+pHS--
|
