1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
|
Return-Path: <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231CCC000B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 24 Apr 2021 14:45:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTP id 1178083CD9
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 24 Apr 2021 14:45:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mattcorallo.com
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with UTF8SMTP id Jbd5FTntJiZt
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 24 Apr 2021 14:45:48 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail.as397444.net (mail.as397444.net
[IPv6:2620:6e:a000:dead:beef:15:bad:f00d])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPS id 350BB83B91
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 24 Apr 2021 14:45:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.as397444.net (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id E77F6550879;
Sat, 24 Apr 2021 14:45:46 +0000 (UTC)
X-DKIM-Note: Keys used to sign are likely public at https://as397444.net/dkim/
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mattcorallo.com;
s=1619274064; t=1619275547;
bh=8dEs3XgeWm8eRomUitF2zu8PWwzqrUfjHS/hAIy6XE0=;
h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From;
b=hh1NDsZX1gQXg05g8bGsi4xaDZBHCyYxAXoIHa2sh+jisdnRNtziNAQWIzfbXColA
mKJpevhCeGDNvMmzDecZxcR4sXClHmeT49pd7Ga4R7hvvDreQP6SCQ204vlUsPP4DN
EwCZBU3p3SUhbd8k7oyNq9qz6qty35KS78+U90x6aQrp1JnSxDJhpolEtI5+5IxBTp
Se2bLDIkEeZeqgBOdeDQM7x4D2gxkiQtNGLVRz5RHAz9+QBIZ/BKx1p8/0sUUSf6Oo
iMyS7sT9b3S2OgWI4OzjTdntz0idpbykauredYv0TAuqJUcqqsLFxluyEm6HOBbzy5
3NyeYnPNxUWKg==
Message-ID: <6764cc61-70cc-2033-43bc-347158dcfd62@mattcorallo.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2021 10:45:46 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Greg Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
References: <CAAS2fgSrkH=7T6=MvhmLq4HAcmJC+_sR9YWQZ3CsrhyLrmBHAw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matt Corallo <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgSrkH=7T6=MvhmLq4HAcmJC+_sR9YWQZ3CsrhyLrmBHAw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2021 14:45:49 -0000
What is preventing the BIP maintainership role from moving to a bot? It does seem like a bot should be able to do a fine
job given the explicit criteria (though ignoring obvious spam is often nice, its by no means a requirement).
Given recent events where humans have....acted like humans, it seems a move to a bot may be warranted.
Matt
On 4/24/21 00:42, Greg Maxwell via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> I am opposed to the addition of Kalle Alm at this time.
>
> Those who believe that adding him will resolve the situation with
> Luke-jr's inappropriate behavior re: PR1104 are mistaken.
>
>
>
> 27e59ffd51ee5a95d0e0faff70e045faca10b00015e90abc1c8de48b1dfff40c
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
|
