1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <stephenreed@yahoo.com>) id 1Wmmey-0006xK-Fs
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 20 May 2014 16:13:00 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of yahoo.com
designates 98.139.213.141 as permitted sender)
client-ip=98.139.213.141; envelope-from=stephenreed@yahoo.com;
helo=nm23-vm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com;
Received: from nm23-vm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com ([98.139.213.141])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.76) id 1Wmmex-0003ut-DT
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 20 May 2014 16:13:00 +0000
Received: from [98.139.215.140] by nm23.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
20 May 2014 16:12:54 -0000
Received: from [98.139.212.215] by tm11.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
20 May 2014 16:12:53 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1024.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
20 May 2014 16:12:53 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 898668.59144.bm@omp1024.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 80026 invoked by uid 60001); 20 May 2014 16:12:53 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: Vyo22d0VM1kWv_VZ6N2MJjHnq5SAwoDmtOh0AOdQPXuDNnN
eHdBEihKygtG634pYlvyM5Now9oEV8WNYHA9FFwZyzZO4.GJMM192MfYOcNB
wt0VCfyTvYjhNngTqpmceZRGpJ8aXIiWlFumpZP4PXM.fEuGfN4wJvksJFdo
8YMsVIAJVXdKkER2gczUxM7ktFkSIWpzd.ARKq4K9vfdR4CSKgv8esp5T.9J
EeOg1pT5GlzKCuyV0KYRe0m_kQ75VHs1J9c_cpi1qxQW.nW.PFdYOQzXUBoj
Cz.wRQFMY8BMKRo5DimQezpzADZOyRYpEnf5uO8edqqp.7yo3hP1qfGM64vU
A8YmivbcOwzOX1slVnWvmtC.eV0_ucb2ytY2QD9amyszC6hDYHFIbsBG8vcm
YjlGwpv2IHfR41GnqeYj7C4I._yVi8LlZ0XrA7653NI31Jtj.VazzGsFMYoJ
CbfWhK89FEDxAHNnvI10a3fGPX.moGWvgaDSFlcHCZrau_T.Il_P2A5.Gotp
xEdMqvz_HJMLo_p0NIbZ7TAyznK0RFHC7BL2G6EOiwz5wWB6ayRRh686WuxB
t9MACHXwHaVSTEq.Kt8nd6yojI.C7tzFW3nbwI7wn37VkItYhEYrLrIs3wJf
Wyz_qvEISp31PBz5uSrQjzL0ixQudJxkKEWhmeOiMANz5lqWKzfOm.NEEX2p
ZLo3PxC6SodGoYnfXwNiRSbqOG1k_hUu4VxqopxwdsoI42M70xGzQkd5d3be
7XcoVVbFn.5aitlygFIXqk7MSNszEioUJAf6kQJusgtkLUky1xiW5g3ZKlqd mR2s-
Received: from [76.250.116.214] by web160501.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Tue, 20 May 2014 09:12:53 PDT
X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001,
SSBjb21wbGV0ZWQgYSB3aGl0ZXBhcGVyIGZvciBCaXRjb2luIGEgcHJvb2Ytb2Ytc3Rha2UgdmVyc2lvbiB3aGljaCB1c2VzIGEgc2luZ2xlIG5vbWFkaWMgdmVyaWZpYWJsZSBtaW50IGFnZW50IGFuZCBkaXN0cmlidXRlZCByZXBsaWNhdGlvbiBvZiBhIHNpbmdsZSBibG9ja2NoYWluIGJ5IGNvbXBlbnNhdGVkIGZ1bGwgbm9kZXMgdG8gYWNoaWV2ZSA2LWhvcCwgc3ViLXNlY29uZCB0cmFuc2FjdGlvbiBhY2tub3dsZWRnZW1lbnQgdGltZXMuIFBsdXMgaXQgcGF5cyBkaXZpZGVuZHMgdG8gaG9sZGVycyBpbnMBMAEBAQE-
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.188.663
Message-ID: <1400602373.46778.YahooMailNeo@web160501.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 09:12:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Stephen Reed <stephenreed@yahoo.com>
To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="1708847852-428783590-1400602373=:46778"
X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [98.139.213.141 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(stephenreed[at]yahoo.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Wmmex-0003ut-DT
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Cooperative Proof-of-Stake whitpaper
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Stephen Reed <stephenreed@yahoo.com>
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 16:13:00 -0000
--1708847852-428783590-1400602373=:46778
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I completed a whitepaper for Bitcoin a proof-of-stake version which uses a single nomadic verifiable mint agent and distributed replication of a single blockchain by compensated full nodes to achieve 6-hop, sub-second transaction acknowledgement times. Plus it pays dividends to holders instead of wasting it on miners. Subsidized transaction fees are thus lower.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C4m-MFnxw0JjDorzrKs_IRQRqD9ila79o0IDt6KsbcE
Because the code is not yet written, this idea is half-baked so to speak. Comments appreciated on my project thread, which will be a development diary. I plan a hard fork of the Bitcoin blockchain in early 2016, after a year of public system testing, and conditioned on wide approval.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=584719.msg6397403#msg6397403
-Steve
Stephen L. Reed
Austin, Texas, USA
512.791.7860
--1708847852-428783590-1400602373=:46778
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:HelveticaNeue-Light, Helvetica Neue Light, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><div class="" style="">I completed a whitepaper for Bitcoin a proof-of-stake version which uses a single nomadic verifiable mint agent and distributed replication of a single blockchain by compensated full nodes to achieve 6-hop, sub-second transaction acknowledgement times. Plus it pays dividends to holders instead of wasting it on miners. Subsidized transaction fees are thus lower.</div><div class="" style=""><br class="" style=""></div><div class="" style="background-color: transparent;"><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C4m-MFnxw0JjDorzrKs_IRQRqD9ila79o0IDt6KsbcE" class="" style="">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C4m-MFnxw0JjDorzrKs_IRQRqD9ila79o0IDt6KsbcE</a><br class="" style=""></div><div class="" style=""><br class="" style=""></div><div
class="" style="">Because the code is not yet written, this idea is half-baked so to speak. Comments appreciated on my project thread, which will be a development diary. I plan a hard fork of the Bitcoin blockchain in early 2016, after a year of public system testing, and conditioned on wide approval.</div><div class="" style=""><br class="" style=""></div><div class="" style=""><span class="" style=""></span></div><div class="" style="">https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=584719.msg6397403#msg6397403</div><div class="" style=""><br class="" style=""></div><div class="" style=""></div><div class="" style="">-Steve</div><div class="" style=""><br></div><div class="" style="">Stephen L. Reed
<br class="" style="">Austin, Texas, USA
<br class="" style="">512.791.7860</div></div></body></html>
--1708847852-428783590-1400602373=:46778--
|
