summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/61/85d1430c549ad1067f4427580f866fbc78cd8d
blob: c5c21442b60ca29cd470006ead14879c3745622b (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>) id 1VJW6z-0005OQ-8V
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 10 Sep 2013 22:08:41 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.217.181 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.217.181; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-lb0-f181.google.com; 
Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com ([209.85.217.181])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1VJW6j-0006Ua-Bg
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 10 Sep 2013 22:08:41 +0000
Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id u14so6762303lbd.40
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.121.3 with SMTP id lg3mr3326630lab.33.1378850898351;
	Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.89.72 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0F445FFE-FA1A-4A64-9A28-C734E744B5F7@godofgod.co.uk>
References: <CAJna-HgXPNa2UCO_edBzK=oY5-F=6LQVHap1Vk9XtGr09chy9Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<796AC330-56EF-43D2-9935-5409824A4F33@godofgod.co.uk>
	<CAJna-HhKDx4xnwWCC7apTLCDwEurFbagNTYXF=doBbhDBaXojA@mail.gmail.com>
	<0F445FFE-FA1A-4A64-9A28-C734E744B5F7@godofgod.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:08:18 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgRtmjhDbyPinVKFcba=2DCDovNPmRO1rCajrZEFWd4ONQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Mitchell <matthewmitchell@godofgod.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(gmaxwell[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
	0.0 TIME_LIMIT_EXCEEDED    Exceeded time limit / deadline
X-Headers-End: 1VJW6j-0006Ua-Bg
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP0039 Mnemonic code for generating
 deterministic keys
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 22:08:41 -0000

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Matthew Mitchell
<matthewmitchell@godofgod.co.uk> wrote:
> Well let's hope something like "murder black people", "stupid asian person" or "whip african slave" doesn't come up. :-) Maybe it would have been better without the aggressive words?

Ouch.

This sounds like something that $20 of mechanical turk time could help
out with a lot.  Put up the 2048 words and ask people to rate them for
potential offensiveness and threatening. :)

Nouns often make for fairly neutral words, though careful for place
names which have had political complications. E.g. gdansk vs danzig.