1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
|
Return-Path: <michabailey@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9DEBB68
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 11 Jul 2015 20:28:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (mail-wi0-f177.google.com
[209.85.212.177])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02FE21BB
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 11 Jul 2015 20:28:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wiwl6 with SMTP id l6so71539310wiw.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=iGJpx+HK1PrVMYEQ1WrhT49x3yBJzpFVo1JYM2Dw57M=;
b=0wkTkVx0UJaIEK3aiJTcmR0vEWfAaUNRyKkLWU0qtl/qf22MyKqzA140gp7aY4aHSK
1ef3tIEkSls6z2bqgwvpf99gYVod48pgni+ogajHTBHti+tgBObF3+/EqBfDunhOA+PU
97GdcmTkCaH+aCC5zlY0xisfj00oVBe1FgI2XVrokE/WhZJ0fs2lu5QU9f4z2G+W1o17
YsUzU1S3D3LCk862pwSoIv2IL2YqU79tquNDYPVFqExVqhbxDlfQ1xvNhraNGWZEHNa+
ccYW2UPVUOv7anDPccbzE8HGYUGL4S7uLGAV8a3OyAq6myM68pU95w6vRV8A8kOsxnx/
9H4Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.20.198 with SMTP id p6mr9077980wie.38.1436646507453;
Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.28.32.132 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201507102110.33706.luke@dashjr.org>
References: <6D3AACE5-D6CD-4785-8A55-F6DF0B94D927@ricmoo.com>
<CAPWm=eWH9rZpwJeK2tTdHH8+BWDU_Vam8oBtG0u49v2yZuYVfw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAE-z3OWMpCW51FjwT8409k_10Uj9Zq=H8AVUo5B6PfYBTQ_Axg@mail.gmail.com>
<201507102110.33706.luke@dashjr.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 23:28:27 +0300
Message-ID: <CAAmoQf1B1nFfS6ZXOkvoJGTaPpbN_NDwOcwCw30MSbRwooSh4Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Micha Bailey <michabailey@gmail.com>
To: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec53f397dbea277051a9f547f
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why not Child-Pays-For-Parent?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 20:28:29 -0000
--bcaec53f397dbea277051a9f547f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Right. The issue (AIUI) is that, right now, even though transactions are
evaluated for inclusion as a group with CPFP, they're not yet evaluated for
relaying as a unit, nor can they be, because the current p2p protocol
doesn't have a way to send multiple transactions in a single protocol
message to signify that they should be evaluated together.
On Saturday, July 11, 2015, Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
> AFAIK the only thing holding it up is lack of unit tests. If anyone would
> like
> to implement those, I expect it'd be merged fairly soon. Then the problem
> is,
> as Jeff mentioned, getting the parent transactions relayed despite failing
> relay policy on their own.
>
> Luke
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org <javascript:;>
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
--bcaec53f397dbea277051a9f547f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Right. The issue (AIUI)=C2=A0is that, right now, even though transactions a=
re evaluated for inclusion as a group with CPFP, they're not yet evalua=
ted for relaying as a unit, nor can they be, because the current p2p protoc=
ol doesn't have a way to send multiple transactions in a single protoco=
l message to signify that they should be evaluated together.<span></span><b=
r><br>On Saturday, July 11, 2015, Luke Dashjr <<a href=3D"mailto:luke@da=
shjr.org">luke@dashjr.org</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quot=
e" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">=
AFAIK the only thing holding it up is lack of unit tests. If anyone would l=
ike<br>
to implement those, I expect it'd be merged fairly soon. Then the probl=
em is,<br>
as Jeff mentioned, getting the parent transactions relayed despite failing<=
br>
relay policy on their own.<br>
<br>
Luke<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"javascript:;" onclick=3D"_e(event, 'cvml', 'bitcoin-=
dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org')">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org<=
/a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoi=
n-dev</a><br>
</blockquote>
--bcaec53f397dbea277051a9f547f--
|
