1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
|
Return-Path: <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96196B6C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:59:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from server3 (server3.include7.ch [144.76.194.38])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176DB1F1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:59:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by server3 (Postfix, from userid 115)
id 0490E2E6068F; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:59:16 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from Jonass-MacBook-Pro-2.local (cable-static-140-182.teleport.ch
[87.102.140.182]) by server3 (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6AA172D00684
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:59:16 +0200 (CEST)
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <CAKEeUhjisp8qdXDNz3C+pB1MUTfvmHZPmsE-f0DVTxnph6NmMQ@mail.gmail.com>
<1530052.vkWv7VPOpL@garp> <20160922182729.GA19254@fedora-21-dvm>
<2232258.WNiT0kZN2f@kiwi>
From: Jonas Schnelli <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>
Message-ID: <57E43810.3070905@jonasschnelli.ch>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:59:12 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2232258.WNiT0kZN2f@kiwi>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="NWAwj24gXaLAKDWI6GbAioM35fwNsdmJK"
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Requesting BIP assignment; Flexible Transactions.
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:59:18 -0000
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--NWAwj24gXaLAKDWI6GbAioM35fwNsdmJK
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="gF9sJOAdBJVB6gusAXA1wgWFJVl8mj99r";
protected-headers="v1"
From: Jonas Schnelli <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Message-ID: <57E43810.3070905@jonasschnelli.ch>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Requesting BIP assignment; Flexible Transactions.
References: <CAKEeUhjisp8qdXDNz3C+pB1MUTfvmHZPmsE-f0DVTxnph6NmMQ@mail.gmail.com>
<1530052.vkWv7VPOpL@garp> <20160922182729.GA19254@fedora-21-dvm>
<2232258.WNiT0kZN2f@kiwi>
In-Reply-To: <2232258.WNiT0kZN2f@kiwi>
--gF9sJOAdBJVB6gusAXA1wgWFJVl8mj99r
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Tom
> I think you misunderstand tagged systems at a very basic level. You th=
ink=20
> that html can only use a bold tag <b> once in a document? Thats equival=
ent=20
> to what you are saying.
Would the "additional" segment contain the same amount of
nSequence-equivalent token as the number of inputs in the "inputs" segmen=
t?
What if you only want to add a per-input-token in the additional segment
for a certain input (assume last input)?
I guess the fundamental difference to html is the possible nesting.
However, I think that should be mentioned/specified in the BIP.
</jonas>
--gF9sJOAdBJVB6gusAXA1wgWFJVl8mj99r--
--NWAwj24gXaLAKDWI6GbAioM35fwNsdmJK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=s3Sj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--NWAwj24gXaLAKDWI6GbAioM35fwNsdmJK--
|
