1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
|
Return-Path: <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51D1C1621
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 5 Oct 2015 20:56:35 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ig0-f181.google.com (mail-ig0-f181.google.com
[209.85.213.181])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2ACB1DF
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 5 Oct 2015 20:56:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igxx6 with SMTP id x6so66766853igx.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 05 Oct 2015 13:56:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=9bJ1AvF4yv5fSL4gGPwyC1QbHTIwJagl4BHbTR0AajA=;
b=Bmmpfh0gYkHt2voeLIfL81NO842LpzwlaeSL/8fW6Hb9dzANuAtftvT6PL6aEqXZRr
BsGSNLK94dYItASbZ4UKKsRVqYWuaiVV74vtfiBovCFRLVkhANpWmnDkijSZO6VuXr1t
KM1IgUPx/xHUe3wuCVcSRQiWJDgtXZhvwADuInWTKwnIwyY304tQGXzDVFEiojawR6jW
l9x/g4q/ZipkIfmQpBWQVanG0xJTq7GW3kvRGhO+m9G/5Zo+pBTyjykBrkAmJp9waP74
5WH7dsl94JX8yS4rKFIpdmy5+PKYSOXlUFcKIAc4fpP2XlZBnPIXqPOHiTzcHOEN8E1+
7xLg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.62.227 with SMTP id b3mr11392668igs.48.1444078594513;
Mon, 05 Oct 2015 13:56:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.19.30 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 13:56:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2081461.sDX5ARzIdv@garp>
References: <CAKzdR-rPoByn=+CgsTc1ZnLkjwtYyJnbQLbn-VHOvz0dLciefQ@mail.gmail.com>
<1489086.kGfJeeyi4a@garp>
<CAAS2fgSyWaRfXHKWZYzZ4X8ksMECaO47dTXum67XwpTTYnbDXg@mail.gmail.com>
<2081461.sDX5ARzIdv@garp>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 20:56:34 +0000
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgSsJ10P7YYAAsV4P6no3pC=WYozWuN64u=WLSB3h6cHwA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Tom Zander <tomz@freedommail.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] This thread is not about the soft/hard fork
technical debate
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 20:56:35 -0000
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Fortunately I can say that while we certainly value your opinion, when peoples
> opinions are hard to read, as you indicated they can be, we should look at
> their actions. The group has followed the consensus rule quite rigorously,
> which I applaud.
What "consensus rule" do you refer to?
Indeed, I suggest you look to actions-- it's not hard to find changes
in Bitcoin Core that one contributor or another disliked. Did you try?
(In this case, I don't even believe we have any regulator
contributors that disagree).
-- even for changes that effected system consensus, in fact. These
things were not hard-forks, however, as there never has been one (+/-
terminology disputes); and part of the point I was making was that the
standard for that is different, and that these differences begin with
technological fundamentals.
|
