1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
|
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0D0C002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 7 May 2022 13:31:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E564C80BD6
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 7 May 2022 13:31:40 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jtimon-cc.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 67XSUfH6uUIF
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 7 May 2022 13:31:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2e.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2e.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2e])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A65A680BCA
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 7 May 2022 13:31:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2e.google.com with SMTP id s30so17355695ybi.8
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 07 May 2022 06:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=jtimon-cc.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=Y5zUMy7T32qTcXCgit9W4jY9oA1qgK/ciiWonumt4qw=;
b=BG+CSE0q9/ZR5I0g/8jkuQq4+sLcyzBg4jL/dcN3Y/zI/F1y+V9HdO5T+Z5H/44cJa
JFJnM7Mp8M6kpu/YZTU61jZ++X/97mNmtmrnV/XWv7QTrIWmj9frzNwVPppNYX1+/ZiF
i/orhYK64HEg0FNIAjDYofywCiUmYETvS4Bh9VMV4Yl7F3d4LRbUnlb6N0++qI6avtll
RNjRJrNy5EkmM0IjtjWmDgzo+tXifo66eotNL8CF9Flvj6rb1n+Q4t9bBu8eEtGGH5ha
/B+x605a8qy4Llxv3qPTWfmVU7FVt7+2johc8AcuSmYTnqWNGIB1dZhuhW38Jcus3Hco
n1uQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=Y5zUMy7T32qTcXCgit9W4jY9oA1qgK/ciiWonumt4qw=;
b=4QpKmmRfb/mHkbk2GgG+/0uXWhXl5Qj4Md8zj7Nab/jjXwQRPDDkpkBBXyZvFXqqq7
vEXxZyLA+N4i7SA0ZEUhZCOps7BbRwCy2VSD17WMieXdC2JqfaD5N+wX/CGYsCo7bqAq
epHaTn01zllYzlLBQk3pPqaaFg/djxGYCkLLBcx9KyenWv5SUtiwjyhldauwnWbmafqu
bUWZJ/JQ6v+GrkSzyrFlq99jv2nNt5DCt/8xaBsNfbXT6biYx3QuqVxslog8TJdy7knz
Wqx9+h6rtsV0BE0oO8QGUn9TxyHEv7HOzEScq1Q/0yfa6MFLtbict7loM0HwWv9BotSS
4bAw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53355OiP2kwN+75c3JYiECvSVER3gLKvugbFiqn1bgWrsqtKucdg
mcmanlUByyEuYP1bWh4M86BAkx6AIg3Lp1fR/HDJhuqwIGlWkA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyBHdkTZPXWqeby5WTdA7TLvZxMbBqUnyZPwTyTJjmweGQIzX5mEMSy09i1MolRZmb+HANpVYdrQfL5oW2bIbM=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:d1c8:0:b0:648:a463:f2ca with SMTP id
i191-20020a25d1c8000000b00648a463f2camr6244322ybg.620.1651930298579; Sat, 07
May 2022 06:31:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1JO1xrnJ9GwGM4TgLH_rL_LpnZgSb1SyeEOJ9Gzc1VMbKUrmxSh-zUXKwFNvp_5wyiDtRviOf-gRJbrfbhOJl-qym1eEHXpoDAgjE9juucw=@protonmail.com>
<629505ec-81ba-013d-43a0-009d61fada23@gazeta.pl>
In-Reply-To: <629505ec-81ba-013d-43a0-009d61fada23@gazeta.pl>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Date: Sat, 7 May 2022 15:31:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CABm2gDpCNpy2j3hoV3-WsjrDYXx1wdsdwVGeagY+pVcjZ7Rk+Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: vjudeu <vjudeu@gazeta.pl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a4104f05de6bfeab"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 07 May 2022 21:22:43 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Speedy covenants (OP_CAT2)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 May 2022 13:31:41 -0000
--000000000000a4104f05de6bfeab
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 5:52 AM <vjudeu@gazeta.pl> wrote:
> > Re-enabling OP_CAT with the exact same OP would be a hardfork, but
> creating a new OP_CAT2 that does the same would be a softfork.
>
> We have TapScript for that. OP_CAT is defined as OP_SUCCESS, it can be
> re-enabled in a soft-fork way. For now, OP_CAT in TapScript simply means
> "anyone can move those coins", so adding some restrictions is all we need
> to re-enable this opcode. Introducing OP_CAT2 is not needed at all, unless
> it will be totally different, but then it should not be named as OP_CAT2,
> but rather as OP_SOMETHING_ELSE, it depends how different it will be from
> OP_CAT.
>
Oh, well, I didn't know any of that. I guess it could be a modification of
OP_SUCCESS if it makes sense instead of a new opcode.
--000000000000a4104f05de6bfeab
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
<div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 5:52 AM <<a=
href=3D"mailto:vjudeu@gazeta.pl">vjudeu@gazeta.pl</a>> wrote:<br></div>=
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-=
left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">> Re-enabling OP_CAT w=
ith the exact same OP would be a hardfork, but creating a new OP_CAT2 that =
does the same would be a softfork.<br>
<br>
We have TapScript for that. OP_CAT is defined as OP_SUCCESS, it can be re-e=
nabled in a soft-fork way. For now, OP_CAT in TapScript simply means "=
anyone can move those coins", so adding some restrictions is all we ne=
ed to re-enable this opcode. Introducing OP_CAT2 is not needed at all, unle=
ss it will be totally different, but then it should not be named as OP_CAT2=
, but rather as OP_SOMETHING_ELSE, it depends how different it will be from=
OP_CAT.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Oh, well, I didn't know an=
y of that. I guess it could be a modification of OP_SUCCESS if it makes sen=
se instead of a new opcode.</div><div><br></div></div></div>
--000000000000a4104f05de6bfeab--
|
