path: root/5e/de605ea6e57e9c1a4735c9d5662cc2abbe18b0

Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::133])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FDEC002A
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Tue,  9 May 2023 00:10:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D97840B9D
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Tue,  9 May 2023 00:10:54 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 1D97840B9D
Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key,
 unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com
 header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=cM87bYvu
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 9-tl6ZMm-ysi
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Tue,  9 May 2023 00:10:53 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 00:07:57 by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 2A0B34017B
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.28])
 by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A0B34017B
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Tue,  9 May 2023 00:10:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F4685C0185;
 Mon,  8 May 2023 20:02:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
 by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 08 May 2023 20:02:55 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date
 :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject
 :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender
 :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1683590575; x=1683676975; bh=co/PpURYUYGFB
 XMadyeuClJ3a5ss+PdCY4GWkP289TU=; b=cM87bYvuIwxCZAnnVs2/TSJ5xALlN
 ASCxvBD1C00YJB/D80ELvwzPGoNJaCH14nbStnP41lDjBcD5EeDZgHiViUIowdpz
 gDOQmZ6qZ1WPxn55awnr+sJMalGwJwG3DAK55zBX7lPLb7GEe5/6AborAGP51w8Z
 YSGlKGhGQBF7NBLBEY2g2Ev8jk0t8VMYm447di+ucy57ZFjJFDSYlIWKgQvgqOml
 G5P7ragl9q+YQVWNqJHR+FZ6YlDDMXXqy8vyu7F5HYZkESFga5ACtw3/fPT5FLJX
 yN2awjQcCIz1LXEI1tmJexTYvQ2JvxlmLU2/oWWEI/CfwTayVCbnIX6iw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:rY1ZZMPqqbSMnwqyRnBYXNP0n5dJwY_DEwcvr7YYcFBm82ZbF0xxww>
 <xme:rY1ZZC9D_mJTGhN3gqEVcnml2XSEfVtLnmWfDlZUVbmcJv6bQKgg8Ez3wRhPKlj9o
 4mqq4cI5XiRj_0XHAQ>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:rY1ZZDQtUz8_1ZR2JB_vNcNarZv17KAWAQgu_1_yvBzEiZV0joR0oRB2pAo>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrfeefledgvdekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
 fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
 uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne
 cujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddtvdenucfhrhhomheprfgvthgv
 rhcuvfhougguuceophgvthgvsehpvghtvghrthhouggurdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtth
 gvrhhnpeelvdellefftddukeduffejgfefjeeuheeileeftdfgteduteeggeevueethfej
 tdenucffohhmrghinhepphgvthgvrhhtohguugdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiii
 gvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehpvghtvgesphgvthgvrhhtohguugdr
 ohhrgh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:rY1ZZEtj2rl5STmElgJ6FK0yPPYVb7p9yyw37V4RVzAaUeoZWvVeRA>
 <xmx:rY1ZZEdtmSZS4UnomBrcJwd_JlXtezfAqJkz55ux9ObFaHhjLiQsKA>
 <xmx:rY1ZZI3t2xeWbecZeUCryFtCDKAQW2AH-Wo_g79FKUrnSQW44mN_vg>
 <xmx:r41ZZD5WCM_Pk5xs20b3oVHIFLdNz1ZtSzSZWfHCXQ9p90ynznjLuw>
Feedback-ID: i525146e8:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon,
 8 May 2023 20:02:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id D061C5F844; Tue,  9 May 2023 00:02:51 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 00:02:51 +0000
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>,
 Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <ZFmNq6NzH4ruDsER@petertodd.org>
References: <Lm_5F74G9G21ydrFPovvmtHWpNXcbVzZibmU80oNqFRehJjcll89-t7OXqS5Fooe0cTNxGreIREMql3Li2xUCe2T5NVyss3-CrLzISO09HY=@notatether.com>
 <0aea4ec5-7d6a-f358-3c20-854001588031@dashjr.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sqNp03fayY6nHCU3"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0aea4ec5-7d6a-f358-3c20-854001588031@dashjr.org>
Cc: Ali Sherief <ali@notatether.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Mempool spam] Should we as developers reject
 non-standard Taproot transactions from full nodes?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 00:10:54 -0000


--sqNp03fayY6nHCU3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 06:37:34PM -0400, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Action should have been taken months ago. Spam filtration has been a
> standard part of Bitcoin Core since day 1. It's a mistake that the existi=
ng
> filters weren't extended to Taproot transactions. We can address that, or
> try a more narrow approach like OP_RETURN (ie, what "Ordisrespector" does=
).
> Since this is a bugfix, it doesn't really even need to wait for a major
> release.

Miners are making millions of dollars from these inscription transactions.
Miners can and do run their own nodes and interconnect to each other. Many
people like myself will continue to run nodes that do not attempt to block
inscriptions. And of course, the current flood of BRC-20 transactions embed
very little data in the chain per transaction and could easily be adapted to
use OP_RETURN or any number of other data embedding schemes; if they were
modified to embed no data at all they wouldn't be much smaller, and I'm sure
you'd still be complaining that they were spam.

--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org

--sqNp03fayY6nHCU3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=RHbo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--sqNp03fayY6nHCU3--