1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
|
Return-Path: <onokatio@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D34E1305
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 4 Oct 2018 14:03:51 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pf1-f170.google.com (mail-pf1-f170.google.com
[209.85.210.170])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32F85773
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 4 Oct 2018 14:03:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pf1-f170.google.com with SMTP id d4-v6so3453275pfn.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 04 Oct 2018 07:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=sjpV6g/EMinMjj3wgPUPHNLH/nwZqI38X+dEAc3E4l8=;
b=F+WspAu6TrfM5VVDD5d7s64N1O6b0kxJMNAl+9ecA+gScp4NbOXDFP3F5nzKchiVAh
gVLrMuXF42btfYFQdx+cnpJQGNmNkavz9mmx8fdChIh767/U0bvMCmxI6niEVRoXJPDR
GZYEC1RgYDS5UvQeAjqx+4FtB4lC85ewI915ua7RBX9qb9LG+9bQ+8L6FJc4hQsAU3aP
YDhq+zB8djJr92ki2RXsGDt5/rTHFpn7CE2WA9sLNzcM1eJUSfxvGvgEr1AfVt7oa1ft
LukOeBY0GCIs9WZrEfvkogtmy0lPMAxCYBNvu8v6sUSSSSM1eK0XTHOlSiViLDb8sh9q
KTFA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=sjpV6g/EMinMjj3wgPUPHNLH/nwZqI38X+dEAc3E4l8=;
b=o/mAi4K+NcgUz3cBBbsEco9ICaQlLu+fwMvTeQseGVVBLgV9n8sCuqBHSBN7E4CW4H
EM3q3N2z7bCtMaF32DFK3wh0WrA86nzF84gceKkUBgqRgDtsI3o6MVanzWgTNqqfZHfk
QJst6gCPmmGAeeWfhm2RprRvQYOw1ldWmBiERPI6p4C8OOiY0sgvxlOMuYCnwrxecCc+
CmgU5b4I22nixCoWiNiwiZOyVnP5pp0PUYzsFMNgLduQ72IIQnkV/GuX8q/yraVvNFJP
QQ57UjCnihCmKV6btfzbp29MfnU5Ll9duVkIffcdl7+zLqbQS2IOsehdxz4buhyUn22C
cnwQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfogsWhT9ukX5652fVaeMQEyq4t/17AhhHOyDtOR+9KcAYEfvD2V3
ArXkyC1zL8b7fsQeccR0wpw37itpmU7cub4ytKkb/AHF
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63k8XFipOBMX/q4fxux0MAa+6HOv+Bd4Y/iSz8sd5Nq7POu+I/jizEzLtnxaAAysdkvqqig5xS1vszQldjziTk=
X-Received: by 2002:a62:e70a:: with SMTP id
s10-v6mr6983790pfh.124.1538661830365;
Thu, 04 Oct 2018 07:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: =?UTF-8?B?44GK44Gu44GL44Gh44GK?= <onokatio@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 23:03:37 +0900
Message-ID: <CAHm82F78NpV0UmyVMuka64Y1b0rwBO6FNj=KwAOm885d9q4xJg@mail.gmail.com>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d417ec0577679fa5"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64,
HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 22:51:51 +0000
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] MultiSig request URI proposal
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 14:03:51 -0000
--000000000000d417ec0577679fa5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Hi.
I have an idea that subject.
There are already BIP 21.
But Multisig request URI is non exist.
My idea is below:
bitcoin-sigreq://{{rawtx}}?{{param}}
rawtx: raw transaction (encoded by base64)
param:
- pubkey={{public key for sign key pair}}
- hd_wallet_position={{path for HD wallet position}}
This URI scheme is used for multisig request from website to user's local
wallet.
How do you think ?
--000000000000d417ec0577679fa5
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">Hi.<div><br></div><div>I have an idea that subject.</div><=
div><br></div><div>There are already BIP 21.</div><div>But Multisig request=
URI is non exist.</div><div><br></div><div>My idea is below:</div><div><br=
></div><div>bitcoin-sigreq://{{rawtx}}?{{param}}</div><div><br></div><div>r=
awtx: raw transaction (encoded by base64)</div><div>param:</div><div>- pubk=
ey=3D{{public key for sign key pair}}</div><div>- hd_wallet_position=3D{{pa=
th for HD wallet position}}</div><div><br></div><div>This URI scheme is use=
d for multisig request from website to user's local wallet.</div><div><=
br></div><div>How do you think ?</div></div>
--000000000000d417ec0577679fa5--
|
