1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
|
Return-Path: <tomh@thinlink.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B67A61BB
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 30 Aug 2015 21:10:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com (mail-pa0-f47.google.com
[209.85.220.47])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C7EB106
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 30 Aug 2015 21:10:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pacdd16 with SMTP id dd16so116362096pac.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 30 Aug 2015 14:10:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date
:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type;
bh=PwagYQlgJIetLSq3oH/XV8HkRT7gcNoQfCENqNFZWvQ=;
b=mF1FjaV4Y8KYD3jv3QTMVF5sJXxRQaHsDoEC/uG+l8bsSvAsuQm8wdz6yxfcI67enM
e9Gp3UKhNJ+u1qaPQOZ43K/oZ6vCJYMK65Pm4lRgr3wyKaDwCe4RcqqQBUWTSeNGF/gf
4E+cIlXsSb5btT7JWUJOWGFNat4do6DJx4aT5YShAj7HnUFnuK3f+kG+q8Ea5Ir+hfQJ
AyUMYOCpom/aH2nUlTt9xSNT3CoiN+TgxhUEROGwelusreC5HkOUv3vUjjLDaYKTTPXj
nd3+ZSLVwLIQWe8Ntlv3vVbArvQuP6RIC+USMLg68RHnPkQXv36o5RnxvKi8XgZcUTVC
2alA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmy9Uaqbvys5gRRDVCOUlCTkhVOSfVGdMn0MMsD2eTJ0izTOsBCXC4w8ADc3jZAFzAmtzjV
X-Received: by 10.66.227.98 with SMTP id rz2mr32933609pac.16.1440969015994;
Sun, 30 Aug 2015 14:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.89] (99-8-65-117.lightspeed.davlca.sbcglobal.net.
[99.8.65.117]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
fh10sm12145663pdb.95.2015.08.30.14.10.14
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Sun, 30 Aug 2015 14:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
To: Peter R <peter_r@gmx.com>
References: <CAEgR2PGsOgdTKMXAabeRZfREciTntj9uaBDLPuFz84rUoSVSLw@mail.gmail.com>
<B52558A9-8897-450B-B386-503773EE0867@gmx.com>
From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <55E3713A.5040000@thinlink.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 14:10:18 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B52558A9-8897-450B-B386-503773EE0867@gmx.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------000400060907080408030104"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
Daniele Pinna <daniele.pinna@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unlimited Max Blocksize (reprise)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 21:10:16 -0000
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000400060907080408030104
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 8/30/2015 9:54 AM, Peter R wrote:
> Like Daniele pointed out, the greedy algorithm assumed in the paper is
> asymptotically optimal in such a case.
I'm convinced.
--------------000400060907080408030104
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 8/30/2015 9:54 AM, Peter R wrote:<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:B52558A9-8897-450B-B386-503773EE0867@gmx.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
Like Daniele pointed out, the greedy algorithm assumed in the
paper is asymptotically optimal in such a case.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I'm convinced.<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------000400060907080408030104--
|
