summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/5c/7c9c9b8e63eeb5acd48804879a03b6257cc109
blob: 6f0683d54afd023940d5a2350ad5367fddaaa230 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <calebdelisle@lavabit.com>) id 1UsLtD-0007Gs-Bq
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 27 Jun 2013 23:46:11 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of lavabit.com
	designates 72.249.41.33 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=72.249.41.33; envelope-from=calebdelisle@lavabit.com;
	helo=karen.lavabit.com; 
Received: from karen.lavabit.com ([72.249.41.33])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1UsLt9-0001ec-U6 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 27 Jun 2013 23:46:11 +0000
Received: from a.earth.lavabit.com (a.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.10])
	by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8421111BC64
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:46:02 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from 64.15.65.115 (laptop.cjd.cjdns.tk [64.15.65.115])
	by lavabit.com with ESMTP id P5NELO678NGL
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:46:02 -0500
Message-ID: <51CCCEB7.1080504@lavabit.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 19:45:59 -0400
From: Caleb James DeLisle <calebdelisle@lavabit.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <1372353053.10405.140661249237317.77984E1F@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<CAAS2fgTka6Dw94V0-vHBHxG=zadu9EmhKmfVm7Y_dQUUgrTf6w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgTka6Dw94V0-vHBHxG=zadu9EmhKmfVm7Y_dQUUgrTf6w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
	no trust [72.249.41.33 listed in list.dnswl.org]
	2.2 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2     FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	0.9 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO
	-1.3 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
X-Headers-End: 1UsLt9-0001ec-U6
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: MultiBit as default desktop
 client on bitcoin.org
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 23:46:11 -0000



On 06/27/2013 01:56 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Jim <jim618@fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
>> Let me know if you think this is a good idea (or not!)
>> and if you have any questions.
>=20
> Being able to promote a fast SPV desktop wallet would be great!
>=20
> I went through an cycle of testing on multibit after I saw some
> complaints when it went up on the page before without at lot of
> discussion. There were a number of issues with it at the time, in
> particular the frequent deadlocks=E2=80=94 though Mike was saying that =
those
> should be fixed.
>=20
> I see some of the the other things that were concerning for me at the
> time are still uncorrected though, e.g. no proxy support (so users
> can't follow our recommended best practices of using it with Tor),


If I were a Bitcoin dev, I would not want to talk about anonymity or
TOR because that's likely to attract people with paranoid dilutions
and they're really terrible users to support :)

Also yay for promoting fast, easy to use clients for casual users!

Thanks,
Caleb


> that it reuses addresses (esp for change), that it doesn't clearly
> distinguish confirmation level. It also make repeated https
> connections to 141.101.113.245? (I'm not seeing the IP in the source,
> and it doesn't have a useful reverse dns entry, so I can't tell what
> its for).  Is there any timeframe for changing any of this stuff?
>=20
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>=20
> Build for Windows Store.
>=20
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>=20