summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/5c/26eec206568e4d6c7c940a53de46f49ce5c66a
blob: b0422473a0fb517c65783a3a9a0390f494ade236 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
Return-Path: <milly@bitcoins.info>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAE42279
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 29 Jul 2015 03:47:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail.help.org (mail.help.org [70.90.2.18])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38A8AEC
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 29 Jul 2015 03:47:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.1.10.25] (B [10.1.10.25]) by mail.help.org with ESMTPA
	; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 23:46:53 -0400
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <1B7F00D3-41AE-44BF-818D-EC4EF279DC11@gmail.com>
	<D2CDA490-F04A-41EA-85F7-56BA5B052729@me.com>
	<CAOG=w-sanb-vOt6YaDJhdT2CCmnqWYTBF204sBZ1=Dsveko7og@mail.gmail.com>
	<35B780B8-7282-4C98-9A0D-C7774028E277@gmail.com>
	<4F7FB1A0-E201-40F2-80BA-4C8D6ECC4DC4@gmail.com>
	<241A813C-91DC-4A66-AC55-BA8F256E9A9B@gmail.com>
From: Milly Bitcoin <milly@bitcoins.info>
Message-ID: <55B84CAF.9020601@bitcoins.info>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 23:46:55 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <241A813C-91DC-4A66-AC55-BA8F256E9A9B@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Satoshi's temporary anti-spam measure isn't
 temporary
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 03:47:04 -0000

> GUYS, WE’VE KNOWN ABOUT THESE PROBLEMS AND HAVE TALKED ABOUT THEM FOR
> YEARS ALREADY…AND IT SEEMS PRACTICALLY NOTHING HAS HAPPENED…

What is the incentive for someone with high level technical skills to 
spend all their time developing and testing code?  Especially since the 
code is generally the boring task of "fixing the plumbing" and won't 
benefit the developer directly ... except they will be blamed if 
something goes wrong.

Russ