1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <jameson.lopp@gmail.com>) id 1VqAAe-0004ZJ-JN
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 23:23:24 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.216.182 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.216.182; envelope-from=jameson.lopp@gmail.com;
helo=mail-qc0-f182.google.com;
Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com ([209.85.216.182])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1VqAAd-0001md-TQ
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 23:23:24 +0000
Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id e16so3367404qcx.27
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 15:23:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.224.47.137 with SMTP id n9mr39525039qaf.47.1386631398433;
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 15:23:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.13] (cpe-076-182-064-253.nc.res.rr.com.
[76.182.64.253])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z16sm23836611qab.3.2013.12.09.15.23.17
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Mon, 09 Dec 2013 15:23:17 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52A650E5.9070801@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 18:23:17 -0500
From: Jameson Lopp <jameson.lopp@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <CAO7N=i1p=7fGgzJXvctRoGTsztP6f9rqs78s9=Vnc3TC0RVLdA@mail.gmail.com> <20131209221130.GA22556@shavo.dd-wrt> <CAO7N=i0Y=sKXa=djc+8652e_0NiWLyMA9hrXyddaS+gOTu0yxQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJHLa0MXzQoSso+ZdXsNf7nzBe=6tCsq0CNrbF6waFxV2moWiQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJHLa0MXzQoSso+ZdXsNf7nzBe=6tCsq0CNrbF6waFxV2moWiQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(jameson.lopp[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1VqAAd-0001md-TQ
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Monetary Authority for Bitcoin
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 23:23:24 -0000
To piggyback on Jeff,
Any proposal that is going to add reliance upon data from third parties
outside of the Bitcoin network itself is likely going to be rejected
outright. This opens far too many potential vulnerabilities.
"The exchanges that are kept track of could be hard coded into Bitcoin
or the miner could choose, how this works is not something I'm
personally focused on."
Yeah... you can't just gloss over a little detail like that. There must
be consensus between the miners, otherwise a solved block will be
rejected by a miner's peers.
--
Jameson Lopp
Software Engineer
Bronto Software, Inc
On 12/09/2013 06:10 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Ryan Carboni <ryan.jc.pc@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It is not a violation of the trust of those holding the currency. Many
>> people bought Bitcoin in the hopes that it's value in the relation of other
>> currencies will increase, not because there's a fixed money supply. The
>> majority of people using Bitcoin as a currency in exchange for real goods
>> are using the exchanges.
>
> Your proposal has been met with widespread laughter. Were I not ill
> with the flu, mockery would ensue as well.
>
|
