summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/5c/00365e01a6142f743d688a0f841c7c70a0e844
blob: aab9fdf981e430b1ea2127a944ac5da1ea8284b0 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
Return-Path: <ricardojdfilipe@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD32BCA4
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:02:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-lf0-f41.google.com (mail-lf0-f41.google.com
	[209.85.215.41])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6C04403
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:02:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lf0-f41.google.com with SMTP id f18so23296092lfg.8
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 12 Dec 2017 06:02:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc; bh=4CwFBC1SoZfblz27p8TjKhAO2Iu7Z6Jz1KMg24kBt8g=;
	b=Xfql1N05mFsrm0sYPT7FOFwSaHS9aHPGE4PM0h/Kj4pVgEM/XUkjwdnD+MNcr40E8B
	sw30zm4hjC39U/h7uhKkq+Fd/yHIq2NflLoUUxk+HCDRIGBQN8rc6OwKO6zuNmIS7PmS
	rNbczTqSDKDUOIheKuhCl1fNs2fMK/nWrro0FtAgNxnDRKnFEOqcwsrWw3LfCt9/nJxL
	nwF/PTgVD4EYbHAC3tfvEKzo7/vlHZfZXh9jwSItSYIizu0IuyN6nGOt2lLwLOwqhmrZ
	6Tv+duIFB4atAoQI3zHq1n6fey3ZMgwcf6Nno8VLeLeUlrs4vLfHpRAAsDPGIKJbJ489
	ZK1A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:cc;
	bh=4CwFBC1SoZfblz27p8TjKhAO2Iu7Z6Jz1KMg24kBt8g=;
	b=qYupX7QRiKM89NG6P8rLbBDiv5LVySPVF/YQu3c0M94quMjm1WJ/5OW4anEpS/T+o6
	NcLLw9fMwu0gRDK901P7m4BjAP1eUZMa/xfvhZBCkOJqVGcRdWxpv/2lS8TXtF1Ur98G
	czangmvGNiPzQn7/DIqD+sxffypQrGJeb5q48kqAVZUPseaXcXy7E0qVZFBWhBqPtJ3m
	d6BO3KGg/OHs21pxckenUxBJMwsCisf0ha4CRh6iyJLP72+94KRHXify3fc/rle3FigM
	Xp8chOJpZwAi1VMgwmb9IpZY4p5ajzA2ZyEeZwPgiEOAa0LWg+r903j+rGUkvAdKhcIU
	2HFA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJ6FDAGqgcuON79CjcHWtcOwtLi630ac/3VtipF9Yk+gTRz4oeP
	1kIBR5A+ohYxufM0tugGguDw+Yba7LsZ/zq+gBQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotWpcTYr9gPoi1oJIs63hwYSA29mOYmtGp4PF5Hn1Rr4Qg5bYkxO9oIc3d28huV+lmmK1JuUeWIaliMTxmW21Y=
X-Received: by 10.25.86.17 with SMTP id k17mr1890398lfb.1.1513087333688; Tue,
	12 Dec 2017 06:02:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.59.146 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 06:02:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5a2f9240.0abddf0a.0333.1139@mx.google.com>
References: <CAEA=K3QiDtuHJNBLbZxaw6eSGhYWC5++vKJEX2Shxs7vb9bZ-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<201712111834.13672.luke@dashjr.org>
	<CAEA=K3TTrMUgfFR0jjYxQS+BU5b+=7nNhT4wEUeUEtnOEP80Dw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALC81COEqhkX04MyJ=hxGgapVTqSeSYXJJUgutxWp5GbZmSSmQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<5a2f9240.0abddf0a.0333.1139@mx.google.com>
From: Ricardo Filipe <ricardojdfilipe@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:02:12 +0000
Message-ID: <CALC81CO20c=PvCj9bk0YxSD2jKxErfyXqWtKwxdC8_qv8J9wSw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Teweldemedhin Aberra <teweldemat@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:07:31 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP - Dead Man's Switch
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:02:16 -0000

You can do it on 2nd layer solutions such as the lightning network,
with their own format.
On the base layer you cannot do it without a hard fork, or it would
undermine the invariants of bitcoin.

2017-12-12 8:24 GMT+00:00 Teweldemedhin Aberra <teweldemat@gmail.com>:
> How?
>
>
>
> From: Ricardo Filipe
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 4:44 AM
> To: Teweldemedhin Aberra; Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
> Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP - Dead Man's Switch
>
>
>
> yes
>
>
>
> 2017-12-12 1:10 GMT+00:00 Teweldemedhin Aberra via bitcoin-dev
>
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>:
>
>> Hi,
>
>> The only solution other than Dead Man's Switch to avoid gradual loss
>
>> Bitcoins in transaction is increasing the divisibiliy of Bitcoins. Then
>
>> Bitcoin values will need integer of more than 64 bits. Could that be done
>
>> with soft fork?
>
>>
>
>> On Dec 11, 2017 9:42 PM, <bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
>
>> wrote:
>
>>>
>
>>> You can implement this already, but only for ~1 year expirations.
>
>>>
>
>>> IF <normal script> ELSE <1 year> CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY ENDIF
>
>>>
>
>>> Perhaps it would make sense to propose a flag extending the range of
>
>>> relative
>
>>> lock-times so you can do several years?
>
>>>
>
>>> Luke
>
>>>
>
>>>
>
>>> On Monday 11 December 2017 5:30:37 PM Teweldemedhin Aberra via
>>> bitcoin-dev
>
>>> wrote:
>
>>> > It is estimated that about 4 million of the about 16.4 Bitcoins ever
>
>>> > mined
>
>>> > are lost forever because no one knows the private keys of some Bitcoin
>
>>> > addresses. This effectively mean there are actually only 14.4 million
>
>>> > Bitcoins in circulation even though 16.4 million are mined. There is no
>
>>> > way
>
>>> > of eliminating the human errors that cause these losses of Bitcoin from
>
>>> > circulation, while the number of Bitcoin that will ever be mined is
>
>>> > capped
>
>>> > at 21 million. This means the total number of Bitcoins that are in
>
>>> > circulation will eventually become zero, bringing the network to an
>>> > end.
>
>>> >
>
>>> > The solution this BIP proposes is to implementing a dead man's switch
>>> > to
>
>>> > Bitcoin addresses. The dead man's switch causes the Bitcoins assigned
>>> > to
>
>>> > dormant addresses to automatically expire. A Bitcoin address is deemed
>
>>> > dormant if it is not used in transactions for some fixed length of
>>> > time,
>
>>> > say ten years.
>
>>> >
>
>>> > The calculation of the miner's reward should take into account the
>
>>> > Bitcoins
>
>>> > that has expired. This means there is a possibility that miner's reward
>
>>> > can
>
>>> > increase if sufficient number of Bitcoins expire.
>
>>> >
>
>>> > Ref:
>
>>> >
>
>>> > http://fortune.com/2017/11/25/lost-bitcoins/
>
>>> >
>
>>> >
>
>>> >
>
>>> >
>>> > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campa
>
>>> > ign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon> Virus-free.
>
>>> > www.avast.com
>
>>> >
>
>>> >
>>> > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campa
>
>>> > ign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
>
>>> > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>>
>
>