1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <witchspace81@gmail.com>) id 1Qi2iE-0003FX-EA
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 16 Jul 2011 11:07:10 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.213.175 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.213.175; envelope-from=witchspace81@gmail.com;
helo=mail-yx0-f175.google.com;
Received: from mail-yx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.213.175])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1Qi2iC-00023w-4V
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 16 Jul 2011 11:07:10 +0000
Received: by yxi19 with SMTP id 19so1039943yxi.34
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sat, 16 Jul 2011 04:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.150.40 with SMTP id x40mr3346935ybd.207.1310814422649;
Sat, 16 Jul 2011 04:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.151.14.9 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jul 2011 04:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1310813679.2195.0.camel@Desktop666>
References: <CAJNQ0stPb+3yarKh4M+tFpjSaSG4-GrZX9AVFPh5q7+Ho_OJOA@mail.gmail.com>
<1310813679.2195.0.camel@Desktop666>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 11:07:02 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJNQ0st1hv4k-11EHOPDqkkXCGQh41ysKhUmT6qgLu8uaGng=Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Smith <witchspace81@gmail.com>
To: Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd6cf08074be804a82dc442
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
1.7 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist
[URIs: bluematt.me]
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(witchspace81[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.1 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in
digit (witchspace81[at]gmail.com)
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
-0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1Qi2iC-00023w-4V
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] The forums...
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 11:07:10 -0000
--000e0cd6cf08074be804a82dc442
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>wrote:
> If we had the moding power, yes, but we don't have nearly enough people
> who could mod such a forum.
>
I think a simpler forum would also be easier to moderate. Main criterion: is
it helpful to users? If not, lock/remove it.
Two categories: Technical Support, Development (which can be split up
between client work, and other software/websites integrating bitcoin).
Those two can be replicated per language if a large enough group exists in
that country that is also willing to maintain order.
I have no problems with volunteering some time moderating, but not on the
current forums.
If this is really a capacity issue then IMO we should simply remove the link
and come up with an alternative medium to address user issues (such as a
moderated mailing list). But I don't really believe this. There's a ton of
successful forums that did pick the right structure and helpful moderators,
and a lot of them are volunteer-driven.
JS
--000e0cd6cf08074be804a82dc442
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Matt Coral=
lo <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-list@bluematt.me">bitcoi=
n-list@bluematt.me</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quot=
e" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"=
>
If we had the moding power, yes, but we don't have nearly enough people=
<br>
who could mod such a forum.<br></blockquote><div><br><br>
I think a simpler forum would also be easier to moderate. Main criterion: =
is it helpful to users? If not, lock/remove it.<br>
<br>
Two categories: Technical Support, Development (which can be split up=20
between client work, and other software/websites integrating bitcoin).<br>
<br>
Those two can be replicated per language if a large enough group exists in =
that country that is also willing to maintain order.<br>
<br>
I have no problems with volunteering some time moderating, but not on the c=
urrent forums. <br>
<br>
If this is really a capacity issue then IMO we should simply remove the=20
link and come up with an alternative medium to address user issues (such as=
a moderated mailing list).=A0 But
I don't really believe this. There's a ton of successful forums th=
at did
pick the right structure and helpful moderators, and a lot of them are=20
volunteer-driven.<br>
<br>
JS=A0
<br><br></div></div>
--000e0cd6cf08074be804a82dc442--
|
