1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
|
Return-Path: <stick@satoshilabs.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F30E541C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 7 Jan 2018 15:16:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail.sldev.cz (mail.sldev.cz [51.254.7.247])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71D01D3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 7 Jan 2018 15:16:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.sldev.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA537EB9E;
Sun, 7 Jan 2018 15:42:03 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sldev.cz
Received: from mail.sldev.cz ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail.sl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 7DITDoX7DrgA; Sun, 7 Jan 2018 15:41:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.8.8.107] (unknown [10.8.8.107])
by mail.sldev.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D12B8EBA4;
Sun, 7 Jan 2018 15:41:57 +0000 (UTC)
To: nullius <nullius@nym.zone>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
References: <57f5fcd8644c6f6472cd6a91144a6152@nym.zone>
From: Pavol Rusnak <stick@satoshilabs.com>
Message-ID: <d05bfa26-4f3d-77d1-5801-9ad59497f334@satoshilabs.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 16:16:47 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <57f5fcd8644c6f6472cd6a91144a6152@nym.zone>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="TcqiHB4lDsDdabWWQjxRhEHe3Lj7MfePh"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 39: Add language identifier strings for
wordlists
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2018 15:16:58 -0000
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--TcqiHB4lDsDdabWWQjxRhEHe3Lj7MfePh
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="BLcVo79DTvwf05tnlnANH1Au4qtUMrrND";
protected-headers="v1"
From: Pavol Rusnak <stick@satoshilabs.com>
To: nullius <nullius@nym.zone>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <d05bfa26-4f3d-77d1-5801-9ad59497f334@satoshilabs.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 39: Add language identifier strings for
wordlists
References: <57f5fcd8644c6f6472cd6a91144a6152@nym.zone>
In-Reply-To: <57f5fcd8644c6f6472cd6a91144a6152@nym.zone>
--BLcVo79DTvwf05tnlnANH1Au4qtUMrrND
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Language: sk-SK
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 05/01/18 14:58, nullius via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> I propose and request as an enhancement that the BIP 39 wordlist set
> should specify canonical native language strings to identify each
> wordlist, as well as short ASCII language codes.=A0 At present, the
> languages are identified only by their names in English.
I am advising not to use any other language than English for BIP39. I
got persuaded to allow more languages when writing BIP39 spec, but I
learned that it was something I should've been more persistently against.=
I am currently drafting a new standard[1] which will allow also Shamir
Secret Scheme Splitting and there we disallow usage of a custom wordlist
in order to eradicate this mess. Will try to push this as BIP too once
we get it to the point we are OK with the contents.
https://github.com/satoshilabs/slips/blob/master/slip-0039.md
--=20
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol "stick" Rusnak
CTO, SatoshiLabs
--BLcVo79DTvwf05tnlnANH1Au4qtUMrrND--
--TcqiHB4lDsDdabWWQjxRhEHe3Lj7MfePh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=urZP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--TcqiHB4lDsDdabWWQjxRhEHe3Lj7MfePh--
|
