1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>) id 1QnACB-0004gv-Hb
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:07:15 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bluematt.me
designates 208.79.240.5 as permitted sender)
client-ip=208.79.240.5; envelope-from=bitcoin-list@bluematt.me;
helo=smtpauth.rollernet.us;
Received: from smtpauth.rollernet.us ([208.79.240.5])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.76) id 1QnACA-0003WM-FT
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:07:15 +0000
Received: from smtpauth.rollernet.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtpauth.rollernet.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC808594017
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 07:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bluematt.me (unknown
[IPv6:2001:470:9ff2:2:20c:29ff:fe16:f239])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: @bluematt.me)
by smtpauth.rollernet.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 07:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:9ff2:1:2c0:caff:fe33:858b] (unknown
[IPv6:2001:470:9ff2:1:2c0:caff:fe33:858b])
by mail.bluematt.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3BFCD64
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 16:07:02 +0200 (CEST)
From: Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
In-Reply-To: <CAJ1JLtvuts2T=gN9Fm0W8yvqMLUorSV+tvcjO+TKwsq=rKnnsQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJ1JLts5_r6hHoJR-gS-CuuvS00p=RQ6iYbCyOkBDcvgs1xtew@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP2RdNv3Ao01jUQuyg0AapuC-e_skMF_2Ot0fkx6jH+nkw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJ1JLtvuts2T=gN9Fm0W8yvqMLUorSV+tvcjO+TKwsq=rKnnsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="=-6jIpt97buhzHJOTU0eCu"
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 16:07:01 +0200
Message-ID: <1312034821.2310.0.camel@Desktop666>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2
X-Rollernet-Abuse: Processed by Roller Network Mail Services. Contact
abuse@rollernet.us to report violations. Abuse policy:
http://rollernet.us/abuse.php
X-Rollernet-Submit: Submit ID 75c8.4e340ffe.6444b.0
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1QnACA-0003WM-FT
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoin DNS addresses
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:07:15 -0000
--=-6jIpt97buhzHJOTU0eCu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 06:42 -0700, Rick Wesson wrote:
> Has anyone offered to write the mythical
> https-address-resolver-easy-button for bitcoind?
That was my point, it already has been written...twice IIRC.
--=-6jIpt97buhzHJOTU0eCu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAABAgAGBQJONA/2AAoJEBrh01BD4I5UXkIQAMreSR9mucomgR9OS/23EkuZ
vWjjMoxgI66DqF+cGkkmOlt2zxXWbO4mB8/L/yJT2YL9cvYwnkeV0NMJ8efW55gL
mPgSY0pRWAWY4GHEYZq0nvi4o5dHtz/iZ/uagNXemYHKGzsPKlIQexC72llx1HMk
9UYHw+rnbgQC6w/ODTvB1ffNWpZwb/KERoPeW8X0gv082NMQtwKVpRHXzTkPUaKN
lRw0P4ySHdhfB5De+NP5sKfATxSfFggk1Q61IQZA2jraBTrbFiDQ8KFsj+XJiKkO
Tgle5oNqUJtPOZLq2aeRCXZM6sF6J0IZs62FdvFUKy1MDl9I5Gc8ggtffYWSZLyK
j3nkVHxQ7zMUr1gOu2at0DW/ooz3J1UkMZq28id6bYqx9MegsiqOTJ2XljTyipDW
+69S2XPzaZCGj9ukxkM3Vb0YIYsRbneefKMSas+uZBTocfzeWe6Mc/wwQMmEE8cD
70q43MClFBAirL/pZs60O9zLviWSLuIQA9NsUnybXqVeEVgHlo+ret+0y28rxZ7t
AxifuuWi/T+4Igys1mxLxJWa+OOPW7pNXH4HfiaHK3u08bDeGhQQUkx3azK2ur5A
icToQcT9Zu10/U8ihYcZRbP09aep8wchf0YiDW33SWiuZlDbYJyj9w/+slgSWxxh
VTBGypj4DFQl0SGMwpBh
=qDVI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-6jIpt97buhzHJOTU0eCu--
|
