1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
|
Return-Path: <jacob.eliosoff@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4613A259
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 31 May 2017 03:07:47 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-lf0-f44.google.com (mail-lf0-f44.google.com
[209.85.215.44])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65D86227
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 31 May 2017 03:07:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lf0-f44.google.com with SMTP id a5so1827455lfh.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 30 May 2017 20:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=UnXK/JFWwvUMVa4Se8E6fcxSdA/FLO0+Wm+ECrjZEH4=;
b=CbKzCUauztl+OwXFeUbqruv81U9+9AJ9cutYq4j02vbRrtbNYEWzOZ6pmx2jl7qsZH
7kUMAIvRciYnFmusfyeJrO/2ry+O1dclnk5Ixu1Jvw5ZGJp568D5tZS/EIbIV+4UTGDa
vnkClI6IzFv4RqZruxhu8f1FhWBLk/r2zfJ/Hx5nBDsz6+k+nwHv/TWvqPCAWN6RThFE
SiWdmFOHTCj5bSejQDJEHo+HtQrniYtIDI4rdCYABDBCHGdSKty2NS80rt4o11G4eeXG
dhr6yspyRoHmiNhUaqs4Lo8rABmwz59wElfA1aFMHBAOoIgGClYebNwjV9qePCqyOlzn
mz5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=UnXK/JFWwvUMVa4Se8E6fcxSdA/FLO0+Wm+ECrjZEH4=;
b=Ys587PjZ97DIXMtcJXDR7RSDGM56EjFNVW+/KffNxrmLezcaexFF+GhFD3usDg29wh
FU9pUPOPZ6tUfBSB6nLHrFtYArXSdYmi9shOcn7MzkkbSAb0GCzZr3/HYf70G/TxNZW3
E6PlNPsM5KZwcAbrAGdSIUlfMLEVAXVGOX84vLhEri67YxTQkbMTPPhgYYLtpwSs9BJ9
yBOdaYRnBzVCZUWxy+3fA3y4Bvy7nZvy/MLPaJO6rPBLijeyOHFjYUrQApq6MZgx3PRt
CIQZmnb4c4BGVY8NWG4nMxTCSePTTaRVwaShfiqCAztJ+o4A5mabMI+BkvOCXjy9bylZ
9vuA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDhcNdvx4Mwwh0ZNi3LVtMrIP/JG9U22smtMP6LoqsvhqGO168Y
ZkPAbUvkoXxzVD8ehPjsRlsG2WGgWQ==
X-Received: by 10.46.32.66 with SMTP id g63mr7076605ljg.51.1496200064842; Tue,
30 May 2017 20:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.80.4 with HTTP; Tue, 30 May 2017 20:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.80.4 with HTTP; Tue, 30 May 2017 20:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <004E1123-8346-48B6-9BCB-94BAE00EC34B@me.com>
References: <201705232023.40588.luke@dashjr.org>
<CAJowKgJK9zBkVAM1NyOsjU04gvwV3zGnk+1ebfpt6rnbiKy6Og@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDpet31gEcBY6NTxEG+xA4rvg8_c79L+J=mJySGbf7Ydbg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAOG=w-uei5-c-Mpp_R6RrN29NTrSV+gpNd79FC3cB6QPG65sEw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAH+Axy5yYQywpy0s9pBZt_fNoLPpWfra-cU9HrUwH71GDOchsQ@mail.gmail.com>
<004E1123-8346-48B6-9BCB-94BAE00EC34B@me.com>
From: Jacob Eliosoff <jacob.eliosoff@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 23:07:43 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAUaCyjbObcb1mJVmeEDmgzNddQCY3QhrHV3fgNbin-ZyqgfeA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jean-Paul Kogelman <jeanpaulkogelman@me.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1142bb7060c4140550c9394f"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 31 May 2017 07:04:49 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hypothetical 2 MB hardfork to follow BIP148
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 03:07:47 -0000
--001a1142bb7060c4140550c9394f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Maybe there's some hole in Jorge's logic and scrapping blockmaxsize has
quadratic hashing risks, and maybe James' 10KB is too ambitious; but even
if so, a simple 1MB tx size limit would clearly do the trick. The broader
point is that quadratic hashing is not a compelling reason to keep
blockmaxsize post-HF: does someone have a better one?
On May 30, 2017 9:46 PM, "Jean-Paul Kogelman via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> That would invalidate any pre-signed transactions that are currently out
> there. You can't just change the rules out from under people.
>
>
> On May 30, 2017, at 4:50 PM, James MacWhyte via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>> The 1MB classic block size prevents quadratic hashing
>> problems from being any worse than they are today.
>>
>>
> Add a transaction-size limit of, say, 10kb and the quadratic hashing
> problem is a non-issue. Donezo.
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
--001a1142bb7060c4140550c9394f
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"auto"><div>Maybe there's some hole in Jorge's logic and=
scrapping blockmaxsize has quadratic hashing risks, and maybe James' 1=
0KB is too ambitious; but even if so, a simple 1MB tx size limit would clea=
rly do the trick.=C2=A0 The broader point is that quadratic hashing is not =
a compelling reason to keep blockmaxsize post-HF: does someone have a bette=
r one?<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra" dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div class=3D"g=
mail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On May 30, 2017 9:46 PM, "J=
ean-Paul Kogelman via bitcoin-dev" <<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@l=
ists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.<wbr>linuxfou=
ndation.org</a>> wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gma=
il_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-lef=
t:1ex"><div dir=3D"auto"><div>That would invalidate any pre-signed transact=
ions that are currently out there. You can't just change the rules out =
from under people.<br><br></div><div><br>On May 30, 2017, at 4:50 PM, James=
MacWhyte via bitcoin-dev <<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoun=
dation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfounda<wbr>tion.org</a=
>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div><div dir=3D"ltr"><=
div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div>=C2=A0<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_q=
uote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1e=
x">=C2=A0The 1MB classic block size prevents quadratic hashing<br>
problems from being any worse than they are today.<br><br></blockquote><div=
><br></div><div>Add a transaction-size limit of, say, 10kb and the quadrati=
c hashing problem is a non-issue. Donezo.</div></div></div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div><span>___________________=
___________<wbr>_________________</span><br><span>bitcoin-dev mailing list<=
/span><br><span><a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" ta=
rget=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundat<wbr>ion.org</a></span><br><s=
pan><a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-d=
ev" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.<wbr>org/mailman/listin=
fo/bitcoin-d<wbr>ev</a></span><br></div></blockquote></div><br>____________=
__________________<wbr>_________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">=
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundat<wbr>ion.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.<wbr>org=
/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-d<wbr>ev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div></div>
</div></div>
--001a1142bb7060c4140550c9394f--
|
