1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
|
Return-Path: <user@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF41C002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:13:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6A241E54
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:13:20 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 7B6A241E54
Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key,
unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=r4a9A3Z/
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id c7Z__TlK5kGv
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:13:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org F2A3641835
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com
[66.111.4.27])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2A3641835
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:13:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46])
by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00C4B5C00D9;
Thu, 20 Oct 2022 20:13:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 20 Oct 2022 20:13:18 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id
:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id
:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to
:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=
fm3; t=1666311197; x=1666397597; bh=wsuk0gIB8gMuqBek41CRZa3C+vL1
wO4tVeX2uYZ7G/I=; b=r4a9A3Z/KEVY+NC686yip8juAfV9OiLgu3xODT1KVh4l
Ba3HfBqOiN72AEDKQJ9LSG3jiw9QOH1cr9LMalw3dp2oKRabeg4KtPAZpb3d2hBj
eirEXSI2nUXPsX2d2tOuQVCp7J4cX5eaiVeYU1k7WAHjTJcpKL0VATwTQ2j3Xh56
Bgsa9yj7P+R43docXG0DoG/xGkbNdxTBuGMmG0bjkavYh6j11Z+zMNbMTUmbUw7R
/eU+4NUhkZArkE0fUvK7r7lOW6h0m6BkKZHHwAKhOlinp7ojFdJUWB+LD7BIGT0g
CEvrPn19sAsutWfDH7xkIIjfKztjlw6im6onMMiF2Q==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:HeRRY-GGBKNvrDasUvs7jUQAWEFVXIeiwJPOnGIF02jjgNTFXDpycA>
<xme:HeRRY_WvfTciBhnJD5uVeibPTNQ9Q-_5LqvItR4TIV7fVj5NQ1f3uhIdxmzVrukGx
unTgLK5NzN1DYUp1IE>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:HeRRY4Jh1i_zazaQTFhHhOR3CTN7ztjo4JfN0Ig-tjReeTWWA_GkFhu3RV8IN88-Bd_xn8vrBF0Kr2_bXKfiap8ZhmxT>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfeeljedgfedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne
cujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddtvdenucfhrhhomheprfgvthgv
rhcuvfhougguuceophgvthgvsehpvghtvghrthhouggurdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtth
gvrhhnpeelvdellefftddukeduffejgfefjeeuheeileeftdfgteduteeggeevueethfej
tdenucffohhmrghinhepphgvthgvrhhtohguugdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiii
gvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehushgvrhesphgvthgvrhhtohguugdr
ohhrgh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:HeRRY4G8nd462-A-Tqi0V_JQ6L9ieRH4Eb7aTdESam8ohpHq0ah8gQ>
<xmx:HeRRY0XttGF8x_kcT9EmyyQWOjrM1NDaxG3YiY_pBjyjsFfzY0kI9w>
<xmx:HeRRY7Ogtzlc6gUfxpokY5cJeUb-0V02Hsx7S-47Jbt_wW3ruVMLuQ>
<xmx:HeRRY7RJAsox22zaNalD_lMOXvuEGvveM9ArPNyU5AudejLSztR6Lg>
Feedback-ID: i525146e8:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu,
20 Oct 2022 20:13:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 52A0E204BA; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 20:13:15 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 20:13:15 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Greg Sanders <gsanders87@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Y1HkG/ai+241I11S@petertodd.org>
References: <CAB3F3DtNWajm669s9a=cs+Dft0PXDu1JHchzEw+yYLmRS+YSYQ@mail.gmail.com>
<Y1HX3cI7k91pTFUf@petertodd.org>
<CAB3F3DtfHHai2q4s9LehK63iAEMUmkpTWaP8dwJ+N1vU7+EBag@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EjSiENbdfn4zh2pw"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAB3F3DtfHHai2q4s9LehK63iAEMUmkpTWaP8dwJ+N1vU7+EBag@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Relaxing minimum non-witness transaction size
policy restriction
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:13:20 -0000
--EjSiENbdfn4zh2pw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 08:07:54PM -0400, Greg Sanders wrote:
> I don't doubt the use case(it's why I opened the issue!). I didn't want t=
he
> proposal to die in case people found it odd that 61, 62, 63, but not 64
> bytes ended up being broadcast able.
>=20
> Perhaps this is not an issue, especially since this isn't a consensus
> change like the Great Consensus Cleanup. Willing to change my proposal and
> PR if people have no strong objections.
I think it's fine if we only restrict 64 bytes. We have a specific reason t=
o do
that and it's ok if we just tell people that. Only fairly-technical use-cas=
es
are affected anyway.
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--EjSiENbdfn4zh2pw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEFcyURjhyM68BBPYTJIFAPaXwkfsFAmNR5BcACgkQJIFAPaXw
kfvWFAgAmnIqJRPpsr1u0ruE2wsLrzh9892+itS1B+/xO+3ajdfkOcBKZG0VE1ZM
51nIuG6Id/J09FRClavbycNx6fb0F9Ws0ScBaPEugdOow6XpH5a87PkZ3zfrG/39
j2gMx3yNFNynBRa1rUczYZ1OYVRybai2P+w91bnqNqy7G1uVbFH5VjkNU3DgM83A
L7nnzmNXu/BggZN5OpSTo2szRRGHRKuu8OyH2WgKosZh7pZISXndj5I0xUgKk3hh
og9k6DAi9K18Qq4SBvo17xvN1n9IQ+6B/YHHMrbi/UkQIxpviRbYZ86FS0kpZpMA
YR5yHLUZuskh3YhdLHyB+lPEzl6l0g==
=H7WP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--EjSiENbdfn4zh2pw--
|
