1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
|
Return-Path: <luke@dashjr.org>
Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F24C013B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 6 Dec 2020 19:46:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB455872DB
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 6 Dec 2020 19:46:46 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id bq01xA53sG7r
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 6 Dec 2020 19:46:42 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 00:09:43 by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21])
by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04F88730B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 6 Dec 2020 19:46:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ishibashi.lan (unknown [12.190.236.212])
(Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0DE7238A00AE;
Sun, 6 Dec 2020 19:36:55 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dashjr.org; s=zinan;
t=1607283415; bh=DQgtfUWIFU86x/2ienEhxu5qVy6ahdRiySsxEFxuhvY=;
h=From:To:Subject:Date:Cc:References:In-Reply-To;
b=mtuaIIWxJd2xxoUVFBry+gX/k2EF5TvRI8slN2wEZ8g/xWyXrz7NP60WJMi/dAu/f
g52ox25pgGMz0w3yXPCMbsjnZX/IWVcXXqHMBKDKREF6Wb9gn1t9CCkDMdt8NY2vxk
PgANTJdUeODiPYMW3aWbP/dJGhztiIb5JsPhJJHU=
From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
yanmaani@cock.li
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2020 19:36:48 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10
References: <MNtH225--3-2@tutanota.de>
<23794877f2c4b7eb69aff1fe83e41da1@cock.li>
In-Reply-To: <23794877f2c4b7eb69aff1fe83e41da1@cock.li>
X-KMail-QuotePrefix: >
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <202012061936.49822.luke@dashjr.org>
Cc: Prayank <prayank@tutanota.de>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP - Automated and Secure Communication
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 19:46:46 -0000
Anything that makes sense to coordinate between different programs is BIP
material, not just core Bitcoin protocol...
On Sunday 06 December 2020 19:14:13 yanmaani--- via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> The reason Samourai did not propose a BIP is that that was not a
> proposal to improve the Bitcoin protocol.
>
> You could write a specification for it, but this mailing list is
> probably the wrong venue.
>
> On 2020-12-06 18:20, Prayank via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > Hello Everyone,
> >
> > I know there have been lot of controversial and heated discussions
> > involving Samourai in past. Ignoring everything including the tweets
> > in which Samourai team mentioned no interest in proposing a BIP
> > related to automated and secure communication used in Soroban, I
> > wanted to know if enough people would be interested in a BIP because
> > it may help other bitcoin projects in future.
> >
> > Tweets: https://twitter.com/SamouraiWallet/status/1334977957157367810
> > [1]
> >
> > https://twitter.com/SamouraiDev/status/1335103101188104194 [2]
> >
> > Ben also tweeted that a BIP would make sense:
> > https://twitter.com/benthecarman/status/1334977096079306753 [3]
> >
> > I think we should keep all the controversial things aside and do
> > everything that helps Bitcoin. It's mentioned in the medium article
> > that it can help other projects like joinmarket, coinswap, snickr etc.
> >
> > https://link.medium.com/uBvIJUSLQbb
> >
> > The source code for a client library in Java is available here
> > https://code.samourai.io/wallet/soroban-client-java and the source
> > code for the Go based server component is available here
> > https://code.samourai.io/wallet/samourai-soroban
> >
> > Let me know if a BIP for such implementation to be used by other
> > bitcoin projects makes sense and if anyone willing to help me in
> > creating a BIP.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > -- Prayank
> >
> > Links:
> > ------
> > [1] https://twitter.com/SamouraiWallet/status/1334977957157367810?s=19
> > [2] https://twitter.com/SamouraiDev/status/1335103101188104194?s=19
> > [3] https://twitter.com/benthecarman/status/1334977096079306753?s=19
> > _______________________________________________
> > bitcoin-dev mailing list
> > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
|
