1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
|
Return-Path: <earonesty@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::137])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5C0C000B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 27 Apr 2021 11:49:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A835402DD
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 27 Apr 2021 11:49:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=q32-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id a-nsWIHG1KFC
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 27 Apr 2021 11:49:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-pl1-x630.google.com (mail-pl1-x630.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::630])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E5D8402D1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 27 Apr 2021 11:49:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pl1-x630.google.com with SMTP id v20so3449473plo.10
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 27 Apr 2021 04:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=q32-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=K2ntybzDlEvAXhXxpr0cJ5rdsQwYrg+hqzu0VynvUP4=;
b=RMDA51h5jtvzvbDeSiH3SqK/mflP0/yfI5BCsbI7WHhmZcYTKqfKaF48T0ei+xoUYl
AA/ZlK9zvE14M3aMVVGNgjcPx/9b38/ZdFAq8rn2o2M8//WYI1/Cr2iCgJMtmfkvEGuo
d6gcj04tpoItwqeOZEyzIvv37+aRFKyG5jR0e/21KiLIH0fPTXmA2AoCNqqijEzNNMcu
mGPRTMRiy67nM13GO34LLgCT+mwKvZc3aAJlMIOt1l98NUht3xjbz/6IS7Mi7fOSVVpl
Cql16HrDAuhl2T0nUmwcDe4C8SFvbkLVm/yxZG3AqhiEnyOLj+ZNgoheBRTvg/0mbTyZ
zS1Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=K2ntybzDlEvAXhXxpr0cJ5rdsQwYrg+hqzu0VynvUP4=;
b=RHJyL7gqLm+H2HsT+cnpEyr9fZNhUQI2n/+GDQV/VC4QYv5Sik8YIUi2Xngu3FapcM
tmYeQIUqXheL0dsE0Ju0ZjOGBeTAG5lzTJotoccgZC+PSnUapxK7pzdWFuReT02F8eCa
xJDPaRWkC8a9iEgPfM4j92ALp57WtbNs3iFjJu/hH3JzO14EdDfI7qgzgtkTcVV6WVPQ
4araeS3vlSn5ibHhd+OjYZDYBXgzrPEU5OMWmpr995NaC9EAWvBUcEjwe6pS+x63zAKa
M1sMkNnTR85A2ZhBEtuywnltuJAfAl8sb1GKlo8e5vy+UMRWmkdy40mdgDw70K1dtB/A
8bjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530tM72NFeQmiR8jX9n+FevKJ+vk1Yrplz20DAxNaBiKtYREwqJv
7pGDinNvUbUCp8umA6E8EvqnnQo4dfw3Q2htqTh1XbA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJycMhdXRu7AADMahRQCifh+C8zjULPRGMrV0HY1+NAgfMoUjlCtJWqA0M99QwsRU06ryVVbj2joJ1/+meeptfI=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:9405:: with SMTP id
r5mr4625766pjo.139.1619524162625;
Tue, 27 Apr 2021 04:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <202104230209.05373.luke@dashjr.org>
<202104252100.07296.luke@dashjr.org>
<40214e32-ffb3-9518-7bc8-9c1059f50da7@mattcorallo.com>
<202104252122.40909.luke@dashjr.org>
<248f871e-1b83-8c7c-678b-3ed0585a6357@mattcorallo.com>
<20210426194309.2k5exujz23vjrgwc@ganymede>
<773C1Ki5dlSNlxD3HK0eJDKHQ9Ikb5vwuKPZ3dkgEPqUmPGN6DrpLv47LNITHOlu7XWzmIpAmgw24noihYJ5lI5Qhmg7yIlboGQsfAowFCw=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <773C1Ki5dlSNlxD3HK0eJDKHQ9Ikb5vwuKPZ3dkgEPqUmPGN6DrpLv47LNITHOlu7XWzmIpAmgw24noihYJ5lI5Qhmg7yIlboGQsfAowFCw=@protonmail.com>
From: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:49:10 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJowKgJ7+aiVM-c+4S9OgwY3mv4nmJjAc4C_pwSKnvUZqpNt4g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "W. J. van der Laan" <laanwj@protonmail.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 12:05:53 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Reminder on the Purpose of BIPs
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 11:49:25 -0000
seems like this is solved by a workflow where a maintainer who
requests changes clearly tags every entry as "changes needed" or
"review requested",, and then the author can resolve/remove the tag
after the changes are made.
not sure PR's are the right tech here.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 6:28 AM W. J. van der Laan via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Monday, April 26th, 2021 at 9:43 PM, David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev =
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 05:31:50PM -0400, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev =
wrote:
> >
> > > In general, I think its time we all agree the BIP process has simply =
failed
> > >
> > > and move on. Luckily its not really all that critical and proposed pr=
otocol
> > >
> > > documents can be placed nearly anywhere with the same effect.
> >
>
> I like the idea of decentralizing the BIPs process. It is a historical ar=
tifact that the bips repository is part of the same organization that bitco=
in core is part of. But there shouldn't be the perception that standardizat=
ion is driven by that, or that there is any kind of (non-trivial) gatekeepi=
ng.
>
> I understand where this perception is coming from, though. There being 11=
1 PRs open at https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pulls indicates that there is=
some kind of bottleneck. I hope adding more BIP editors can mitigate this =
somewhat.
>
> Though it also happens that the BIP author simply don't care about change=
s anymore and doesn't respond, in which case the PR lingers without any fau=
lt from the BIPs maintainer. So something is to be said of having the BIP r=
epository mirror/aggregate author's own work trees, and changes needing to =
be proposed there instead of "upstream".
>
> -W
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
|
