1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
|
Return-Path: <nbvfour@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 161FBF35
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 20 Dec 2015 03:37:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-io0-f170.google.com (mail-io0-f170.google.com
[209.85.223.170])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A497144
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 20 Dec 2015 03:37:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-io0-f170.google.com with SMTP id o67so126169263iof.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 19 Dec 2015 19:37:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=sTIR02NW8RH97DbovMnemus9rintzR2HCt35Ypgk3n8=;
b=bA6kIKVE9MkmPwNjpNigmIhkdKCD3CIe0tGhHypar+BB2qGomqXNfuXBN7bmMSV8iu
vQnqeJGIVOnYPTvsIDnNZ+pY3EbviXdUNdi1ZbM0oo2eZ5wCiwKAwd0H6pYogHwI5dxo
w9Gd59b9vwfa5GUQLPXFMlNTCgsYY6AHN2TyMCz2IkGmxH0jGIgjwWNjXUx0TPk3RFby
CwoetWfk9ffkvMBSCvJSRA9BAqGlMc3FsEimKUENwMh3+uadTjLoZVTvYtXMksxY/Uob
Fwz09yltyjCJ2FkGnXYuMSK+3fweeKmU4FhuDOSPI2zIgfhfeiqQUh3YBdZAXqgRVmCx
CksQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.13.143 with SMTP id 137mr12593439ion.72.1450582646148;
Sat, 19 Dec 2015 19:37:26 -0800 (PST)
Sender: nbvfour@gmail.com
Received: by 10.36.20.142 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 19:37:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20151219174309.GB30640@muck>
References: <b19eb676c18ba451605cb02159541dd9@xbt.hk>
<20151219174309.GB30640@muck>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 19:37:26 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: t9UHaLyDU0hqVjy_nvFj_MIU0-U
Message-ID: <CAAcC9yvBQj=UtbcmnSpMvmwaaRd1ftfg2VLq3JuU2wmp9Vah=Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Priest <cp368202@ohiou.edu>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Segregated witness softfork with moderate
adoption has very small block size effect
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 03:37:27 -0000
By that same logic, any wallet that implemented P2SH is also voting
for an increased block size, since P2SH results in smaller
transactions, in the same way SW results in smaller transactions.
On 12/19/15, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 11:49:25AM -0500, jl2012 via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> I have done some calculation for the effect of a SW softfork on the
>> actual total block size.
>
> Note how the fact that segwit needs client-side adoption to enable an
> actual blocksize increase can be a good thing: it's a clear sign that
> the ecosystem as a whole has opted-into a blocksize increase.
>
> Not as good as a direct proof-of-stake vote, and somewhat coercive as a
> vote as you pay lower fees, but it's an interesting side-effect.
>
> --
> 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
> 00000000000000000188b6321da7feae60d74c7b0becbdab3b1a0bd57f10947d
>
|
