1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05B1B69
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:42:26 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail148110.authsmtp.com (outmail148110.authsmtp.com
[62.13.148.110])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E64910F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:42:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c232.authsmtp.com (mail-c232.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.232])
by punt20.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id tAH0gOrl099668
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:42:24 GMT
Received: from savin.petertodd.org (75-119-251-161.dsl.teksavvy.com
[75.119.251.161]) (authenticated bits=128)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id tAH0gIGr069621
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO)
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:42:21 GMT
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 19:42:18 -0500
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Message-ID: <20151117004218.GB6302@savin.petertodd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Server-Quench: 102917b6-8cc4-11e5-829e-00151795d556
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVJwpGK10IU0Fd
P1hyKltILEZaQVBf Ri5dBBEKBAw1ADwr dVUTOktcZVUwAEN1
UkhIR0JSFA9sAxYD B1AZVwdzdgxYentx e0dkX29eVENldAg5
MzZUQhRxJ2dmYWYd UQ5cdgtdPgJKfBZE bQJ5SXteMmEaZ3s1
QkpjZWE8eG0HcXkM HVBQIQ9PH1AsBiJ5 RhZKMygrGQU/Sj03
Jhcrb3QNWWgcPw1y H0YlXRciGTFTYgAA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1037:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 75.119.251.161/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Opt-in Full Replace-By-Fee (Full-RBF)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:42:26 -0000
--TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Summary
-------
Opt-In Full-RBF allows senders to opt-into full-RBF semantics for their
transactions in a way that allows receivers to detect if the sender has
done so. Existing "first-seen" mempool semantics are left unchanged for
transactions that do not opt-in.
At last week's IRC meeting(1) we decided to merge the opt-in Full-RBF
pull-req(2), pending code review and this post, so this feature will
likely make it into Bitcoin Core v0.12.0
Specification
-------------
A transaction is considered to have opted into full-RBF semantics if
nSequence < 0xFFFFFFFF-1 on at least one input. Nodes that respect the
opt-in will allow such opt-in transactions (and their descendents) to be
replaced in the mempool if they meet the economic replacement criteria.
Transactions in blocks are of course unaffected.
To detect if a transaction may be replaced check if it or any
unconfirmed ancestors have set nSequence < 0xFFFFFFFF-1 on any inputs.
Rational
--------
nSequence is used for opting in as it is the only "free-form" field
available for that purpose. Opt-in per output was proposed as well by
Luke-Jr, however the CTxOut data structure simply doesn't contain any
extra fields to use for that purpose. nSequence-based opt-in is also
compatible with the consensus-enforced transaction replacement semantics
in BIP68.
Allowing replacement if any input opts in vs. all inputs opting in is
chosen to ensure that transactions authored by multiple parties aren't
held up by the actions of a single party. Additionally, in the
multi-party scenario the value of any zeroconf guarantees are especially
dubious.
Replacement is allowed even if unconfirmed children did not opt-in to
ensure receivers can't maliciously prevent a replacement by spending the
funds. Additionally, any reasonable attempt at determining if a
transaction can be double-spent has to look at all unconfirmed parents
anyway.
Feedback from wallet authors indicates that first-seen-safe RBF isn't
very useful in practice due to the limitations inherent in FSS rules;
opt-in full-RBF doesn't preclude FSS-RBF from also being implemented.
Compatibility
-------------
Opt-in RBF transactions are currently mined by 100% of the hashing
power. Bitcoin Core has been producing transactions with non-maxint
nSequence since v0.11.0 to discourage fee sniping(3), and currently no
wallets are known that display such transactions yet do not display
opt-in RBF transactions.
Demonstrations
--------------
https://github.com/petertodd/replace-by-fee-tools#incremental-send-many
1) http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-discuss/2015-November=
/000010.html
2) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6871
3) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2340
--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000000f30567c63f8f4f079a8ecc2ab3d380bc7dc370e792b0a3a
--TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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==
=rLPd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu--
|
