1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
|
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::133])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2909EC000B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 17 Mar 2022 11:32:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0475D40141
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 17 Mar 2022 11:32:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jtimon-cc.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id vk31EUcaQAo8
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 17 Mar 2022 11:32:37 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-yw1-x1134.google.com (mail-yw1-x1134.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1134])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19F0440122
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 17 Mar 2022 11:32:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yw1-x1134.google.com with SMTP id
00721157ae682-2e58e59d101so54147587b3.13
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 17 Mar 2022 04:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=jtimon-cc.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=hrrghyP9q5CT+xguPNtUj1jkYYTtaD61O26JnATCGkE=;
b=B95ZuKXj3UB57qpa2jePP8wldBd8U4W2uuitq3gKVj/nDW6byCsWh5aA4vWnfjhTqi
FRokho38tgTZiv+NECSnGKSmNSMhiYpPjIBYhkjMxpjA1ozUQbxCOL18uEdHM01kYHHY
eKL3pZ7VImKdm31/Nhnau9LQYovEyeHNDn06n1QB9GUTzT+4o7CuyCaVQMqzfb8pd2G/
oEUpYACS9jB0+wioNUx3xfd2OjT3gZLObADq9/3dnWiGie3w76MWZGBY71sm8XbqhiRa
8qy3/LqA99bPH7IxG8uRusjB82BRF1Ia9D8hJCznrv+rDn8zqZAmzPh/4xE/L23/q14a
9dqw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=hrrghyP9q5CT+xguPNtUj1jkYYTtaD61O26JnATCGkE=;
b=lClHXLc/qDkZde8GBdKVvHJ82HuyVZoZHLbfWKNrKHBTA6PaOD9l//4E2HGSzuFzU/
qjOyrG8juPsC0zGrGH3tkLtFtokH5FHU2FpBClmoTC2FdPBLpo9Sh/PLxFO+cpV5W81U
miC98H+FxS3wtizAGQj36nMUXQxlILYU9EB/djJf6bdWGe5Ypfwg9ipjmmq3TjR8u6+F
0BQLK8nG4Y4iTyre/M54qYbESu9NqNjLe8s/TB7Jr0fFPNROuF+fuXmcHqKqwfHVa8DQ
LQcJAKXJvA6B/q4T0UsWiEFEIu9/YvHAHSTnGMWm35vh5QPt5AZ+OoQZ69gRhShy8AMF
yKnw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532LOMii+rrKudiqdj0DKBXOWS/aZsM68PI6fMpmom50y492XyGm
suWKmfn1NpjoRI+RMeLd2HJ4IWhuPOiG2gXBprU9xA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyya5uUaRo91cHhileHty7CLR+Dnw/3vwF6WBbFN6bCJvCUYokTDZ4BqvQv7X75OiJeyFkyZV42JHIcxUcleuQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a81:4955:0:b0:2e5:9fb5:f3e9 with SMTP id
w82-20020a814955000000b002e59fb5f3e9mr4858172ywa.441.1647516755898; Thu, 17
Mar 2022 04:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMZUoKkTDjDSgnqhYio8Lnh-yTdsNAdXbDC9RQwnN00RdbbL6w@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDrdoD3QZ=gZ_nd7Q+AZpetX32dLON7pfdC4aAwpLRd4xA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAMZUoK=kpZZw++WmdRM0KTkj6dQhmtsanm9eH1TksNwypKS8Zw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAGpPWDZWKF=r4fQP8+JSBaUHT9ZTFYn7RKUgApMx4sys6Cx7Xg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGpPWDZWKF=r4fQP8+JSBaUHT9ZTFYn7RKUgApMx4sys6Cx7Xg@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 12:32:24 +0100
Message-ID: <CABm2gDqWgqwaYRgY0HHMRw4W9C6T-i5zjzFawtU3Ys9UWZn-AQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Billy Tetrud <billy.tetrud@gmail.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 11:52:12 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Speedy Trial
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 11:32:38 -0000
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 5:32 PM Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> I think involving users more in activation is a good avenue of thought fo=
r improving how bitcoin does soft forks. I also think the idea you brought =
up of some way for people to signal opposition is a good idea. I've suggest=
ed a mechanism for signature-based user polling, I've also suggested a mech=
anism where miners can actively signal for opposing a soft fork. It seems l=
ike there should be some common ground between us in those ideas. Where it =
seems we may perhaps unreconcilably disagree are that A. miners are users t=
oo and generally have interests that are important and different than most =
users, and giving them at least some mechanism to force discussion is appro=
priate, and B. chain splits are no joke and should almost never be possible=
accidentally and therefore we should make a significant effort to avoid th=
em, which almost definitely means orderly coordination of miners.
Any user polling system is going to be vulnerable to sybil attacks.
> Do you have anything concrete you want to propose? An example mechanism? =
Are you simply here advocating your support for BIP8+LOT=3Dtrue?
Yes, I want BIP+LOT=3Dtrue (aka the original bip8).
I also want users to be easily able to coordinate resistance to any
given change, as I described in this thread and others and luke has
done many times.
I also generally oppose to speedy trial being used for any consensus
rule change deployment.
Imagine someone comes and proposes a block size increase through
extension block softfork.
Would you like them to use speedy trial or BIP8+LOT=3Dtrue for deployment?
|
