1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
|
Return-Path: <xor@freenetproject.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EECEBC04
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 19 Jan 2016 06:08:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from smtprelay03.ispgateway.de (smtprelay03.ispgateway.de
[80.67.31.30])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ABAAEB
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 19 Jan 2016 06:08:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [77.178.133.31] (helo=anonymous)
by smtprelay03.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa
(TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84)
(envelope-from <xor@freenetproject.org>) id 1aLPPv-0004s9-IU
for bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org;
Tue, 19 Jan 2016 07:05:23 +0100
From: xor@freenetproject.org
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Reply-To: xor@freenetproject.org
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 07:06:50 +0100
Message-ID: <1591452.8UA7xN1qih@1337h4x0r>
Organization: Freenet Project
User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-74-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20160118111416.GA23240@amethyst.visucore.com>
References: <20160117100808.GA4299@amethyst.visucore.com>
<2974102.cQI6F9PQvI@1337h4x0r>
<20160118111416.GA23240@amethyst.visucore.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2788228.P4xtAGd2Uv";
micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Df-Sender: eG9yQGZyZWVtYWlsLmJvZ2VydC5kZQ==
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 06:34:12 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 release candidate 1 available
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 06:08:28 -0000
--nextPart2788228.P4xtAGd2Uv
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On Monday, January 18, 2016 12:14:16 PM Wladimir J. van der Laan wrote:
> It has been tested in git for almost half a year. This RC is the first
> binary release that contains the functionality.
>
> It is extremely unlikely that the wallet will eat your coins (always backup
> nevertheless), but I can't guarantee there won't be some issue where the
> wallet and chain get out of sync and you're forced to redownload the
> blockchain.
I think I asked the wrong way, sorry: My question was not really meant at
whether it is bug-free (testing that is the purpose of a release candidate, so
we of course don't know yet), but rather whether it is at least feature
complete now.
Remember, the previous v0.11.0 release notes said:
> Block pruning is currently incompatible with running a wallet due to the
> fact that block data is used for rescanning the wallet and importing keys
> or addresses (which require a rescan.) However, running the wallet with
> block pruning will be supported in the near future, subject to those
> limitations.
So I'm interested whether this limitation has been lifted, and the whole
feature is considered as finished.
If yes, I would highly recommend advertising it in the new release notes - as
said, the disk space reduction is a big deal.
Thank you!
--nextPart2788228.P4xtAGd2Uv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)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=DSVt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart2788228.P4xtAGd2Uv--
|
