1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <pete@petertodd.org>) id 1UFpnL-00026l-MX
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:48:55 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org
designates 62.13.149.82 as permitted sender)
client-ip=62.13.149.82; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org;
helo=outmail149082.authsmtp.co.uk;
Received: from outmail149082.authsmtp.co.uk ([62.13.149.82])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1UFpnK-0006l7-8r for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:48:55 +0000
Received: from mail-c233.authsmtp.com (mail-c233.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.233])
by punt14.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id r2DHmhjV029965;
Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:48:43 GMT
Received: from savin (76-10-178-109.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.178.109])
(authenticated bits=128)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id r2DHmcIP011040
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:48:41 GMT
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:48:38 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20130313174838.GA22621@savin>
References: <CABsx9T0xOpNpFG4bo7wjcMV8a_xtw_jrRx_fiSutX08yfP8P7Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T0xOpNpFG4bo7wjcMV8a_xtw_jrRx_fiSutX08yfP8P7Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Server-Quench: 3e641a29-8c06-11e2-a49c-0025907707a1
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aQdMdwEUFVQGAgsB AmUbWlNeVFV7XWI7 bAxPbAVDY01GQQRq
WVdMSlVNFUsqA2h5 W01nMhlzdgVCeDB5 Z0ZmEHMOWkB7JER0
X0YHFWsbZGY1an1O VEkLagNUcgZDfhhC alcuVT1vNG8XFCY/
FAwoPiI8dTxZJGxS TA9IJlIbQEBDAiQ1 QQsLFikuGkseLwAA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1021:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 76.10.178.109/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1UFpnK-0006l7-8r
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Blocksize and off-chain transactions
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:48:55 -0000
--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 01:01:43PM -0400, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> > The very statement that we're willing to increase the blocksize as our
> > solution to increased transaction volume rather go down the path of
> > off-chain transactions is incredibly controversial.
>=20
> I really don't understand this either/or mentality.
You said it best yourself:
10:48 < gavinandresen> Luke-Jr: argument for another day, but I can
almost guarantee that the blocksize limit will be raised in less than 2
years, just based on pressure from the big businesses using the chain
(and no, NOT satoshidice)
Decentralization offers big businesses nothing; they're a regulation
target already by virtue of size alone.
> OF COURSE we're going to raise the block size limit. Limiting the main
> blockchain to single-digit transactions-per-second is not an option,
> the vision FOREVER has been to scale it up.
>=20
> And OF COURSE there will be off-chain transactions-- at the very
> least, we need them for "instantly confirmed" transactions.
>=20
> But lets table that whole discussion until 0.8.1 is out the door.
>=20
> --=20
> --
> Gavin Andresen
>=20
--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlFAu/YACgkQpEFN739thoycQgCeMh9jjoM5Q5A/PRjuA4WJlwS8
64AAn3bd9WPI4hsatZg/O+fzeJaL/Gwb
=NXgz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c--
|
