1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <jgarzik@bitpay.com>) id 1WW42Q-0005ap-99
for Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 04 Apr 2014 13:20:06 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com
designates 209.85.213.54 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.213.54; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com;
helo=mail-yh0-f54.google.com;
Received: from mail-yh0-f54.google.com ([209.85.213.54])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1WW42O-0001BX-EL
for Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 04 Apr 2014 13:20:06 +0000
Received: by mail-yh0-f54.google.com with SMTP id f73so3100304yha.27
for <Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Fri, 04 Apr 2014 06:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
bh=0UQ7Fn8d0CAfUcrs06oeqYsoVdWLLQ+hhZo3J+BCiJc=;
b=LJkza1BDCOPFN7hBrbc5rF1qxDfXuIxMG5nGbWYKeEpo8G4FClAiuBFF80ZWhPF7g3
JXqZ2+Z36KsHcd378xL1UlpzdkJ6rES72YVFKJpoDOcqUjl/J7Fib4mTZdCTP1Sq0KWO
sJOJ3Ex5eif91F3jsmmkvLPc2xd6a5oo/4sb2lMbs8TIIyZCl2ItJ2rGtp2xR0VTm08N
w1rczzH/F+7VLYIWehBkFvXQIaYUHaRQD0ls57ZfNu9xmAtbq7ORJ2dqBzNIhRU695jf
gNlc3EBRno0C/NvNIt0MGZ04kUv1ArbPLcS++EiczZD8BsPqPe5IF0votrA534Xjuzo/
YEVg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnfPk2YrQFk8t3mRXDbrPXYKJvoUZAJl479fuUNIbhP6qIUuaWa6UHj4pm3VS34kpbnaf6d
X-Received: by 10.236.156.65 with SMTP id l41mr17041018yhk.9.1396617593575;
Fri, 04 Apr 2014 06:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.170.162.214 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 06:19:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+s+GJBr-UOqYFGVpann-yUkmB5oj4a7fu=GKw-34+4UMbsP1g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPg+sBh1_mYH4JNv1xTFnLsoC=qzmgi0QaLAyd7YeQ=wZQBDSQ@mail.gmail.com>
<1784069.HYVIiriube@crushinator> <533E29F0.1080901@jerviss.org>
<CA+s+GJBr-UOqYFGVpann-yUkmB5oj4a7fu=GKw-34+4UMbsP1g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 09:19:33 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJHLa0P9SmynBfJ94A1js30j2OsC0PeEhEy-n+6Wa2Sogo+TNw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1WW42O-0001BX-EL
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Finite monetary supply for Bitcoin
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 13:20:06 -0000
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com> wrote:
> Personally I'd prefer to standardize on ISO 8601 (YYYY-MM-DD) dates as well.
+1 for all-numeric, easily computer parse-able without a lookup table,
and naturally sorts correctly in a lexicographic sort.
English (or any language) should never be in a date format, on a computer.
--
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
|
