1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
|
Return-Path: <james.obeirne@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82304C000B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 26 Apr 2021 16:56:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7069D403AC
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 26 Apr 2021 16:56:33 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 7zj4Fx0-ojv5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 26 Apr 2021 16:56:32 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-yb1-xb33.google.com (mail-yb1-xb33.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b33])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AED34041C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 26 Apr 2021 16:56:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb33.google.com with SMTP id p3so45064474ybk.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 26 Apr 2021 09:56:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=o+cDlFSqS4JmOiA78qPsa9vsfxt2ZkFyva19NW/Afqo=;
b=GJlPbpOi+ehqy2zM+tnhl6oqswWa9ALemcOqi2sBxd0sIG6paTjkUTgC76yG7J4qRh
qrveathbu807YXAbIpWZPGGOfxS8+OTRfSpq6tG58YgI/GK1sNXvJrw6ENnxftM8Oy5x
yfEMKSNN88nsYSLdOqNOc2QzYC99j+81ghYqdElIjtAQkb5VAfb6l1REdeCMFEPO1H6R
MxgttIhdVSRWOstNRhIuSOLOr9ExGVS9xX+RxR7FszwlLufhCBDM6Il9VyfsxII/aVW4
ntKMe6CvfJ+BhCNiRiE0JQTB9N40BjzXe9XT4gZ1yE10M5mxS5xVekCALcU9vuLLA0EU
AeJQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=o+cDlFSqS4JmOiA78qPsa9vsfxt2ZkFyva19NW/Afqo=;
b=kd2TZ/cVIZ6F57TRKHuQdqwZl/8RI5qGYMzzZtl7DMswt/7WoFadF4nvv7A3ganR17
m+QfoTyzF/zS8GTy/aQAIfszwqzVXT+TFVa7lpznwfilQR/oJmcz78k5z5715hD1k2WV
STdPdzXL83uDPx6vUBy2vobGPlvJTfC6gWGyi92JuQESMhXF6TypXzPlYARY+tOssdt1
vjUv4W7e9PtWoWXk7lkLBQm9MQPA2g4Ql5VYrNO86AAAmpuezQMQGqYPj178tjzscWiT
A1bvYfN3KHxwh9/qXGsZrF+K3XMoJeu/SmsTkPq3BCItkBQHimViYjp8I3m3UEBEi4gi
zIyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5319NpZqsBDZsf631DVBmdbxRwHL8/SlWVxP2nEzUj2Z2Ej3aSAa
Jw8TXyX40DDNlq8017yVaXAgyGbXtyM88G+XDJGDkUIn
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzqUP4pu9rYasPFLXUxeiw6Y9IcIKOVO9j/sCxIReUdciC7LY2Oyfg/fgmYt+9xFtwvzHC9f2ZZoXBn0ROacx8=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:5d0b:: with SMTP id r11mr25339323ybb.380.1619456190993;
Mon, 26 Apr 2021 09:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <202104230209.05373.luke@dashjr.org>
<54852E33-080B-4C44-AD75-F0902B420280@sprovoost.nl>
In-Reply-To: <54852E33-080B-4C44-AD75-F0902B420280@sprovoost.nl>
From: "James O'Beirne" <james.obeirne@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 09:56:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPfvXfK=CPg6D_k+=CoLdf9v8KOuqV0CZyD6J0XgnSiDsAM_WQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sjors Provoost <sjors@sprovoost.nl>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fe58e205c0e30633"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 18:55:02 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 16:56:33 -0000
--000000000000fe58e205c0e30633
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
ACK for Kalle.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021, 09:55 Sjors Provoost via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> ACK for adding Kalle.
>
> Recent drama aside, having a single editor is not ideal. There's currently
> 110 open pull requests to the BIPs repo.
>
> - Sjors
>
> > Op 23 apr. 2021, om 04:09 heeft Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> het volgende geschreven:
> >
> > Unless there are objections, I intend to add Kalle Alm as a BIP editor to
> > assist in merging PRs into the bips git repo.
> >
> > Since there is no explicit process to adding BIP editors, IMO it should
> be
> > fine to use BIP 2's Process BIP progression:
> >
> >> A process BIP may change status from Draft to Active when it achieves
> >> rough consensus on the mailing list. Such a proposal is said to have
> >> rough consensus if it has been open to discussion on the development
> >> mailing list for at least one month, and no person maintains any
> >> unaddressed substantiated objections to it.
> >
> > A Process BIP could be opened for each new editor, but IMO that is
> > unnecessary. If anyone feels there is a need for a new Process BIP, we
> can go
> > that route, but there is prior precedent for BIP editors appointing new
> BIP
> > editors, so I think this should be fine.
> >
> > Please speak up soon if you disagree.
> >
> > Luke
> > _______________________________________________
> > bitcoin-dev mailing list
> > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
--000000000000fe58e205c0e30633
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"auto">ACK for Kalle.</div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div d=
ir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Mon, Apr 26, 2021, 09:55 Sjors Provoost =
via bitcoin-dev <<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org=
">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote=
class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc soli=
d;padding-left:1ex">ACK for adding Kalle.<br>
<br>
Recent drama aside, having a single editor is not ideal. There's curren=
tly 110 open pull requests to the BIPs repo.<br>
<br>
- Sjors<br>
<br>
> Op 23 apr. 2021, om 04:09 heeft Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev <<a hre=
f=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D=
"noreferrer">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>> het volgende ges=
chreven:<br>
> <br>
> Unless there are objections, I intend to add Kalle Alm as a BIP editor=
to<br>
> assist in merging PRs into the bips git repo.<br>
> <br>
> Since there is no explicit process to adding BIP editors, IMO it shoul=
d be<br>
> fine to use BIP 2's Process BIP progression:<br>
> <br>
>> A process BIP may change status from Draft to Active when it achie=
ves<br>
>> rough consensus on the mailing list. Such a proposal is said to ha=
ve<br>
>> rough consensus if it has been open to discussion on the developme=
nt<br>
>> mailing list for at least one month, and no person maintains any<b=
r>
>> unaddressed substantiated objections to it.<br>
> <br>
> A Process BIP could be opened for each new editor, but IMO that is<br>
> unnecessary. If anyone feels there is a need for a new Process BIP, we=
can go<br>
> that route, but there is prior precedent for BIP editors appointing ne=
w BIP<br>
> editors, so I think this should be fine.<br>
> <br>
> Please speak up soon if you disagree.<br>
> <br>
> Luke<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_bl=
ank" rel=3D"noreferrer">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
> <a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-=
dev" rel=3D"noreferrer noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfou=
ndation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank" =
rel=3D"noreferrer">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundati=
on.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
--000000000000fe58e205c0e30633--
|
