1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F1A5323
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 24 Jul 2015 17:43:28 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail149058.authsmtp.co.uk (outmail149058.authsmtp.co.uk
[62.13.149.58])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6CBE12F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 24 Jul 2015 17:43:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235])
by punt16.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t6OHhPA1000871;
Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:43:25 +0100 (BST)
Received: from savin.petertodd.org (75-119-251-161.dsl.teksavvy.com
[75.119.251.161]) (authenticated bits=128)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t6OHhLs9079616
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:43:23 +0100 (BST)
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 13:43:20 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Thomas Zander <thomas@thomaszander.se>
Message-ID: <20150724174320.GB25947@savin.petertodd.org>
References: <CAGLBAhepXCaChSBsz49YNnLOOpiy9nsNYqNv0NH+G3W=17=2yA@mail.gmail.com>
<trinity-44986062-638d-4c20-a1f8-56a7c7cec648-1437709050654@3capp-mailcom-bs10>
<2275059.uyAkQvreAU@coldstorage>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2275059.uyAkQvreAU@coldstorage>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Server-Quench: 7b664544-322b-11e5-b397-002590a15da7
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aAdMdAYUEkAYAgsB AmMbWlxeVF57W2A7 bA9PbARUfEhLXhtr
VklWR1pVCwQmRRp+ fkZiERBycAxAeXg+ YkJlVz5cDkJ8cUN5
RlNXF29UeGZhPWUC AkNRcB5UcAFPdx8U a1UrBXRDAzANdhEy
HhM4ODE3eDlSNhEd aAARJlUTRw4xGTcw QhkaVW93RBBBDyIp
Z1YHJBYjEQ49NQ0U NkchWFQXeX1aIwtX G1BWATQx
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 75.119.251.161/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Roadmap 2015,
or "If We Do Nothing" Analysis
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 17:43:28 -0000
--/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 03:39:08PM +0200, Thomas Zander via bitcoin-dev wro=
te:
> On Friday 24. July 2015 05.37.30 Slurms MacKenzie via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > It's worth noting that even massive companies with $30M USD of funding =
don't
> > run a single Bitcoin Core node,
>=20
> I assume you mean that they don't have a Bitcoin Core node that is open t=
o=20
> incoming connections. Since that is the only thing you can actually test,=
no?
We can test the fact that blockchain.info's wallet and block explorer
has behaved in a way consistent with not running a full node - they have
shown invalid data that any full node would reject on multiple
occasions, most recently invalid confirmations during the BIP66 fork.
--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000000006baf20e289b563e3ec69320275086169a47e9c58d4abfba
--/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQGrBAEBCACVBQJVsnk0XhSAAAAAABUAQGJsb2NraGFzaEBiaXRjb2luLm9yZzAw
MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwNmJhZjIwZTI4OWI1NjNlM2VjNjkzMjAyNzUwODYxNjlh
NDdlOWM1OGQ0YWJmYmEvFIAAAAAAFQARcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JncGV0
ZUBwZXRlcnRvZC5vcmcACgkQJIFAPaXwkfv62AgApbVVVKeKjOGefwC0JMPQitmI
E8mgXB+79Giw2802SZnR8fHo7tZUDOZ9QP4Jh1GpmJcwBZC7E1c5vR+CdJTDuXsW
GTeLVxJHnHHSImWyXMjeyrXyyu8NMxrEW1XLV7icfdXvdSxRmTb6jaUB3KNMrWfY
V4x6CL1JzE7wSNTYhPODhgoA1dYIJSaYy1HGQOTkYRWLSx32KnuAPHIg0e2HlIe+
1T5WmnWPdwTqrasmpXuV2z3TzaJ1i+JC3s3SGCZn8navjmTgzvsv5Ein/07i+ZBr
42t7r96yBNV7BSK2PF12qMMjQN42AWY+efKxR/Si3b5AkX7Zs/h959DbbwcO8A==
=A5Oq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4--
|
