summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/48/821e6de2d780533a1176771e579c1a6973f0e9
blob: fbe547d08447b312b3682eeb92fb282eda112f51 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
Return-Path: <danny.thorpe@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A0EE121A
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue,  8 Sep 2015 20:28:43 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-qg0-f50.google.com (mail-qg0-f50.google.com
	[209.85.192.50])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A7BA279
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue,  8 Sep 2015 20:28:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qgev79 with SMTP id v79so93265980qge.0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 08 Sep 2015 13:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=hsdaFmT8hdVdG+dX6brbGUGx1s61t2sB/2i75dv+8mQ=;
	b=GiWMtplm05Ev3hTNYw6yA1zMe/GDWZdtcD0URwcqMhpLcUyesBQ/TR8i4ewXnMx5iy
	jJYhfc3zJ5FwDa3O1LtbzIdwk6n/WBUclpTEHay6GFCpSVKVGQcISfurWrO4ctWLrdPv
	4vmOTYSFb54bKiMMdkWBV79VXpZ+C3uzEBb7q+oCQqhbhIoAKl8spuxs++sIvmDhzQZY
	iNXNUDLKZZd42YNyZlsXIZbyPac8nZ7Hq0YLOHeNkm+/+OCAJ0UXtaexgzF+BLze9Ofy
	ZfxhBiV0D8frc/b2RFq//DIjdaTmFNtcxSiCDSeBpkZ0GjtEyUX1mNofEWm53w0GNtPU
	dVdA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.23.52 with SMTP id 49mr38596328qgo.38.1441744121376;
	Tue, 08 Sep 2015 13:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.55.217.144 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 13:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALBHtZzHeDy-6Ar+DWUb8hFG4kJcg9+x4Y=TUEiQr3-rbgannw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALBHtZzHeDy-6Ar+DWUb8hFG4kJcg9+x4Y=TUEiQr3-rbgannw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 13:28:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJN5wHV=o0_tdsKg1DwhwKcD4_uNffETYDb+Rzuy66hdoFybtw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Danny Thorpe <danny.thorpe@gmail.com>
To: Ken Shirriff <ken.shirriff@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c14836363647051f423656
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposal to add the bitcoin symbol to Unicode
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 20:28:43 -0000

--001a11c14836363647051f423656
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

What of this prior effort, proposing B-with-horizontal-bar (=C9=83)?
http://bitcoinsymbol.org/

They argue that B-with-2-vertical-bars is easily confused with the Thai
Bhat currency symbol, which is a B with a single vertical bar.

I'm not terribly fond of the B-with-horizontal-bar as a symbol, but it does
have the advantage that it is already in the Unicode glyph set, already
available on most Unicode enabled devices.

-Danny

On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Ken Shirriff via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> Use of the bitcoin symbol in text is inconvenient, because the bitcoin
> symbol isn't in the Unicode standard. To fix this, I've written a proposa=
l
> to have the common B-with-vertical-bars bitcoin symbol added to Unicode.
> I've successfully proposed a new character for Unicode before, so I'm
> familiar with the process and think this has a good chance of succeeding.
> The proposal is at http://righto.com/bitcoin-unicode.pdf
>
> I received a suggestion to run this proposal by the bitcoin-dev group, so
> I hope this email is appropriate here. Endorsement by Bitcoin developers
> will help the Unicode Committee realize the importance of adding this
> symbol, so please let me know if you support this proposal.
>
> Thanks,
> Ken
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>

--001a11c14836363647051f423656
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">What of this prior effort, proposing B-with-horizontal-bar=
 (=C9=83)? <a href=3D"http://bitcoinsymbol.org/">http://bitcoinsymbol.org/<=
/a><div><br></div><div>They argue that B-with-2-vertical-bars is easily con=
fused with the Thai Bhat currency symbol, which is a B with a single vertic=
al bar.=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div>I&#39;m not terribly fond of the B-w=
ith-horizontal-bar as a symbol, but it does have the advantage that it is a=
lready in the Unicode glyph set, already available on most Unicode enabled =
devices.</div><div><br></div><div>-Danny</div></div><div class=3D"gmail_ext=
ra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Ken Shir=
riff via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@li=
sts.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundatio=
n.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"m=
argin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"l=
tr"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
<div dir=3D"ltr">Use of the bitcoin symbol in text is inconvenient, because=
 the bitcoin symbol isn&#39;t in the Unicode standard. To fix this, I&#39;v=
e written a proposal to have the common B-with-vertical-bars bitcoin symbol=
 added to Unicode. I&#39;ve successfully proposed a new character for Unico=
de before, so I&#39;m familiar with the process and think this has a good c=
hance of succeeding. The proposal is at=C2=A0<a href=3D"http://righto.com/b=
itcoin-unicode.pdf" target=3D"_blank">http://righto.com/bitcoin-unicode.pdf=
</a></div><div><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>I received a suggestion to r=
un this proposal by the bitcoin-dev group, so I hope this email is appropri=
ate here. Endorsement by Bitcoin developers will help the Unicode Committee=
 realize the importance of adding this symbol, so please let me know if you=
 support this proposal.=C2=A0</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Ke=
n</div></div>
</div><br></div>
</div><br></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a11c14836363647051f423656--