1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|
Return-Path: <milly@bitcoins.info>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCE02847
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 5 Aug 2015 00:26:11 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail.help.org (mail.help.org [70.90.2.18])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 380D089
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 5 Aug 2015 00:26:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.1.10.25] (B [10.1.10.25]) by mail.help.org with ESMTPA
; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 20:26:01 -0400
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <CABsx9T1E1s=4h-SxLTOAXK4GniZrUekcEb6zDdTDFG+h7X98MA@mail.gmail.com>
<1438640036.2828.0.camel@auspira.com>
<CABsx9T2A-Mz9z=TTifbL2_sKCDvy8coRpNse+0vff6EbXbp8cg@mail.gmail.com>
<BF420F3B-044C-46F6-8880-FEEB9A3DC748@gmx.com>
<3162BC78-EC0B-4DAA-A472-D143389DDD8A@hashingit.com>
<CABsx9T0yad_2NOYEdrJbqX48wCvuQiYb=zP1eC3YwOCc1ODN9w@mail.gmail.com>
<3E3C6C76-DF1F-4F06-A01F-4E126B70C8F2@petertodd.org>
From: Milly Bitcoin <milly@bitcoins.info>
Message-ID: <55C1581C.7080804@bitcoins.info>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 20:26:04 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3E3C6C76-DF1F-4F06-A01F-4E126B70C8F2@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=ham
version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] "A Transaction Fee Market Exists Without a Block
Size Limit"--new research paper suggests
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:26:11 -0000
>For those wishing to do actual research, esp. people such as profs mentoring students, ...
>But keep in mind that you're wading into a highly politically charged research field
>with billions hanging on the blocksize limit; understand that people aren't happy when
>flawed papers end up on reddit being used to promote bad ideas. You'd be wise to run future
>work past experts in the field prior to publishing widely if you dislike heated controversy.
> Or, I could just point out the obvious rather than try to be polite: you know exactly why
>the above makes no sense as a reply to this thread and are deliberately lying.
>If the situation is the latter, your conduct is toxic to the development mailing list
>discussion, not to mention a waste of all our time, and you should leave.
Researchers should also keep in mind that some of developers are
immature and have limited knowledge or experience beyond their Bitcoin
expertise ("Idiot-savants"). Others want to be in "charge" of
drama-laced posts on reddit and they get upset if others do the same
things.
In any case these rants and attacks by Todd and Garzik should be posted
on their personal blogs or reddit instead of this list.
Russ
|
