1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
|
Return-Path: <tomh@thinlink.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72B97FDF
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 9 Sep 2015 03:27:24 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com (mail-pa0-f45.google.com
[209.85.220.45])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0833BE9
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 9 Sep 2015 03:27:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by padhk3 with SMTP id hk3so58058046pad.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 08 Sep 2015 20:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=yM/2kIt7bK33KgvadLYLlpH8sopbjnbC2Lasz1BV0Cs=;
b=DlpoNY/POJHhAWmGxI7EO00eXluMsGJ1fCJkNprMuns63pkb5IJsml5eD3cuRAoSSq
aAwFP345GdzviD6vhxPDOTcAVxE4HXjHz0kCjaBe7RFnR1eajCKV7vMwqMilOz/CVdv7
HC2GFpi2MuhGmxUdEYz3+4w5gWcYrAlK0EHz57mOtSo7iGLimw24e+6+L7Y5NaothAbq
s4+Oqa6Q7WfIHjfPBFwbQY/pl0ZP9N/elBfJt3Qj+rPrvjNVZjqzp4P8RTuPWqobToP4
Ki+3bxwNmEbpysKsULnBRKuUQ+oeFFVkm/8KgTbPoDnGdJ5fNThtdsYB0sUdDeHX8As+
vxyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQljbEhx4BZIvi3h260iScdap9kouBI6wzgI7Hi+k+dhSS76tLiw8wsOaWt+ESLvfDdQBzze
X-Received: by 10.68.204.232 with SMTP id lb8mr67116226pbc.146.1441769243584;
Tue, 08 Sep 2015 20:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.89] (99-8-65-117.lightspeed.davlca.sbcglobal.net.
[99.8.65.117]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
kp7sm5103486pdb.49.2015.09.08.20.27.22
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Tue, 08 Sep 2015 20:27:22 -0700 (PDT)
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <09C8843E-8379-404D-8357-05BDB1F749C1@me.com>
<CAJS_LCWRagQ40c28SGetxeHxnk8FqY3y_X0OxfqaiLbd25dSGg@mail.gmail.com>
<A6B32C22-4006-434E-9B89-D7C99B5743A8@me.com>
<116B26BD-D8E8-4AFD-A619-2EAC348DA5E6@me.com>
<CALqxMTGHiQ_EBfquF8T82H6doueaH04DTmGY9wf5nVhD0kcMgg@mail.gmail.com>
<D727CEA8-7206-4D0A-9815-672C92F73353@me.com>
From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <55EFA71A.1080102@thinlink.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 20:27:22 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D727CEA8-7206-4D0A-9815-672C92F73353@me.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Adjusted difficulty depending on relative
blocksize
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 18:24:20 -0000
There is another concern regarding "flexcap" that was not discussed.
A change to difficulty in response to anything BUT observed block
production rate unavoidably changes the money supply schedule, unless
you also change the reward, and in that case you've still changed the
timing even if not the average rate.
On 8/14/2015 8:14 AM, Jakob Rönnbäck via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Ah, there we go. I should have dug deeper into the mailing list
>
> Thanks
>
> /jakob
>
>> 14 aug 2015 kl. 17:03 skrev Adam Back <adam@cypherspace.org>:
>>
>> There is a proposal that relates to this, see the flexcap proposal by
>> Greg Maxwell & Mark Friedenbach, it was discussed on the list back in
>> May:
>>
>> http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-May/008017.html
>>
>> and http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-May/008038.html
>>
>> Adam
>
|
