summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/46/146b893417cc474c67084946e608096648030b
blob: ce153307d4482db70d4209d3da1c5623e86816ed (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <laanwj@gmail.com>) id 1VipMt-0001Pp-ST
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 19 Nov 2013 17:45:43 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.214.42 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.214.42; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-bk0-f42.google.com; 
Received: from mail-bk0-f42.google.com ([209.85.214.42])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1VipMs-0001rn-V5
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 19 Nov 2013 17:45:43 +0000
Received: by mail-bk0-f42.google.com with SMTP id w11so1089406bkz.1
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:45:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.205.15.72 with SMTP id pt8mr16784057bkb.17.1384883136425;
	Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:45:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.71.206 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:45:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgREw+5NWaFVYd9FS-s63_-24tyWsz5_w6yc8+mGnFYUgQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJHLa0MCJzFapBYu+cGcJobeVkuS3yibpgaEJOmEj5-1wWEDYA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+s+GJDnCx4ZT5woovB-MsKfHOqNoC9WefKQ-VMpWHCZrat5Kw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANAnSg1eH8+sY6n4-cptdzS5Qj0aXdN_d8h8B9joyk73HGL6ZA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAS2fgREw+5NWaFVYd9FS-s63_-24tyWsz5_w6yc8+mGnFYUgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 18:45:36 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+s+GJAW9j88VWNgmpXTjeSFOxHHzow82E2pyvyfKr=SRcS-Kg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com>
To: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf301cbd5c6719da04eb8b3bbb
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
	See
	http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
	for more information. [URIs: github.com]
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(laanwj[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1VipMs-0001rn-V5
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Revisiting the BIPS process, a proposal
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 17:45:44 -0000

--20cf301cbd5c6719da04eb8b3bbb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Drak <drak@zikula.org> wrote:
> > It's quite normal for standards bodies to allocate numbers when in draft
> > status. If they don't pass, they don't pass - they are clearly labelled
> > DRAFTs.
> >
> > +1 on having things in a github repository. Much better for
> collaboration,
>
> The IETF makes a clear distinction between individual proposals and
> documents which have been accepted by a working group. The former are
> named after their authors.  Work is not assigned a number until it is
> complete.
>

Talking about complete, BIP 40 and 41 don't even have an associated
document:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips
I agree that was over-eager number assigning.

Wladimir

--20cf301cbd5c6719da04eb8b3bbb
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail=
_quote">On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Gregory Maxwell <span dir=3D"ltr">=
&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:gmaxwell@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">gmaxwell@gmail.=
com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-=
left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8=
:53 AM, Drak &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:drak@zikula.org">drak@zikula.org</a>&gt;=
 wrote:<br>

&gt; It&#39;s quite normal for standards bodies to allocate numbers when in=
 draft<br>
&gt; status. If they don&#39;t pass, they don&#39;t pass - they are clearly=
 labelled<br>
&gt; DRAFTs.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; +1 on having things in a github repository. Much better for collaborat=
ion,<br>
<br>
The IETF makes a clear distinction between individual proposals and<br>
documents which have been accepted by a working group. The former are<br>
named after their authors. =C2=A0Work is not assigned a number until it is<=
br>
complete.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Talking about complete, BIP 4=
0 and 41 don&#39;t even have an associated document:<br><a href=3D"https://=
github.com/bitcoin/bips">https://github.com/bitcoin/bips</a><br></div><div>
I agree that was over-eager number assigning.<br></div><div><br>Wladimir<br=
><br></div></div></div></div>

--20cf301cbd5c6719da04eb8b3bbb--