1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <tamas@bitsofproof.com>) id 1WOTn5-0000Cz-Bu
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:12:55 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.66])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.76) id 1WOTn2-0007t3-8S
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:12:55 +0000
Received: from [37.143.74.116] (helo=[192.168.2.2]); authenticated
by wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa
(TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
id 1WOTmv-0006WJ-W3; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 16:12:46 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_949F0710-95DE-403E-8D03-D8FAE4AB9EE3";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com>
In-Reply-To: <lfv5ml$vl8$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 16:12:45 +0100
Message-Id: <A34BC75F-5077-48B9-AB5A-225437838BC2@bitsofproof.com>
References: <CAKaEYhK4oXH3hB7uS3=AEkA6r0VB5OYyTua+LOP18rq+rYajHg@mail.gmail.com> <52852C2D.9020103@gmail.com> <52853D8A.6010501@monetize.io> <CAJHLa0M6CkoDbD6FFixf9-mmhug7DvehSWCJ+EHWVxUDuwNiBg@mail.gmail.com> <EE02A310-8604-4811-B2D0-FC32C72C20F3@grabhive.com> <CAJHLa0OMcTCgGESi-F4jT2NA3FyCeMYbD_52j47t3keEYBfK8g@mail.gmail.com> <CAKm8k+3J9Po4xQn9LhTQrnrGCvG36-kLCjWPX4kmd-c7h+LujA@mail.gmail.com> <CANEZrP1VbQPapKJCLcE0+vpK0xac6D6JxRGKdagPVchfZjpUmQ@mail.gmail.com> <lfscfd$3cs$1@ger.gmane.org> <lfv2an$iv3$1@ger.gmane.org> <362072F0-1EA8-4474-AE26-4691C852A22C@bitsofproof.com> <lfv4tm$lpg$1@ger.gmane.org>
<A1A0E432-3E76-429C-AADF-083A0041C34B@bitsofproof.com>
<lfv5ml$vl8$1@ger.gmane.org>
To: Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de; tamas@bitsofproof.com; 1394809972;
a4905972;
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
X-Headers-End: 1WOTn2-0007t3-8S
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] moving the default display to mbtc
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:12:55 -0000
--Apple-Mail=_949F0710-95DE-403E-8D03-D8FAE4AB9EE3
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_E80EC39F-E0C5-4221-B9A7-F4C605887AC5"
--Apple-Mail=_E80EC39F-E0C5-4221-B9A7-F4C605887AC5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
I think you want to misunderstand me Andreas.
It is astonishing arrogance to define the units because we in Bitcoin =
are used to
some wierd notation and ignore that the vast majority of population and=20=
financial software in existence does not have a notion of prices
with more than two decimals.
With 1 bit =3D 100 satoshi, we would solve this problem for good.=20
Instead mBTC is a confusing step in-between.
Tamas Blummer
http://bitsofproof.com
On 14.03.2014, at 16:02, Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de> =
wrote:
> By that definition 3.56 is a price. Maybe I misunderstood you and =
you're
> lobbying for mBTC?
>=20
>=20
> On 03/14/2014 03:57 PM, Tamas Blummer wrote:
>> you miss the point Andreas. It is not about the magnitude but about
>> the form of a price.
>>=20
>> A number with no decimals or with two decimals is percieved as a
>> price in some currency.=20
>>=20
>> A number with more than two decimals is just not percieved as a price
>> but as a geeky something that you rather convert to local currency.
>>=20
>> Tamas Blummer
>> Bits of Proof
>>=20
>> On 14.03.2014, at 15:49, Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de
>> <mailto:andreas@schildbach.de>> wrote:
>>=20
>>> How much do you pay for an Espresso in your local currency?
>>>=20
>>> At least for the Euro and the Dollar, mBTC 3.56 is very close to =
what
>>> people would expect. Certainly more familiar than =C2=B5BTC 3558 or =
BTC
>>> 0.003578.
>>>=20
>>> Anyway, I was just sharing real-world experience: nobody is =
confused.
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> On 03/14/2014 03:14 PM, Tamas Blummer wrote:
>>>> You give them a hard to interpret thing like mBTC and then wonder
>>>> why they rather look at local currency. Because the choices you
>>>> gave them are bad.
>>>>=20
>>>> I think Bitcoin would have a better chance to be percieved as a
>>>> currency of its own if it had prices and fractions like currencies
>>>> do.
>>>>=20
>>>> 3.558 mBTC or 0.003578 BTC will never be as accepted as 3558 bits
>>>> would be.
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> Tamas Blummer Bits of Proof
>>>>=20
>>>> On 14.03.2014, at 15:05, Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de
>>>> <mailto:andreas@schildbach.de>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>>> btw. None of Bitcoin Wallet's users complained about confusion
>>>>> because of the mBTC switch. In contrast, I get many mails and
>>>>> questions if exchange rates happen to differ by >10%.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> I suspect nobody looks at the Bitcoin price. It's the amount in
>>>>> local currency that matters to the users.
>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>> On 03/13/2014 02:40 PM, Andreas Schildbach wrote:
>>>>>> Indeed. And users were crying for mBTC. Nobody was asking for
>>>>>> =C2=B5BTC.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> I must admit I was not aware if this thread. I just watched
>>>>>> other wallets and at some point decided its time to switch to
>>>>>> mBTC.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> On 03/13/2014 02:31 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:
>>>>>>> The standard has become mBTC and that's what was adopted.
>>>>>>> It's too late to try and sway this on a mailing list thread
>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Gary Rowe
>>>>>>> <g.rowe@froot.co.uk <mailto:g.rowe@froot.co.uk>
>>>>>>> <mailto:g.rowe@froot.co.uk>> wrote:
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> The MultiBit HD view is that this is a locale-sensitive
>>>>>>> presentation issue. As a result we offer a simple
>>>>>>> configuration panel giving pretty much every possible
>>>>>>> combination: icon, m+icon, =CE=BC+icon, BTC, mBTC, =CE=BCBTC, =
XBT,
>>>>>>> mXBT, =CE=BCXBT, sat along with settings for leading/trailing
>>>>>>> symbol, commas, spaces and points. This allows anyone to
>>>>>>> customise to meet their own needs beyond the offered default.
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> We apply the NIST guidelines for representation of SI unit
>>>>>>> symbols (i.e no conversion to native language, no RTL giving
>>>>>>> icon+m etc).
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> Right now MultiBit HD is configured to use m+icon taken from
>>>>>>> the Font Awesome icon set. However reading earlier posts it
>>>>>>> seems that =CE=BC+icon is more sensible.
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> Let us know what you'd like.
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> Links: m+icon screenshot: http://imgur.com/a/WCDoG Font
>>>>>>> Awesome icon:
>>>>>>> http://fortawesome.github.io/Font-Awesome/icon/btc/ NIST SI
>>>>>>> guidelines: http://physics.nist.gov/Pubs/SP811/sec07.html
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> On 13 March 2014 12:56, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com
>>>>>>> <mailto:jgarzik@bitpay.com>
>>>>>>> <mailto:jgarzik@bitpay.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> Resurrecting this topic. Bitcoin Wallet moved to mBTC
>>>>>>> several weeks ago, which was disappointing -- it sounded like
>>>>>>> the consensus was uBTC, and moving to uBTC later --which will
>>>>>>> happen-- may result in additional user confusion, thanks to
>>>>>>> yet another decimal place transition.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> =
--------------------------------------------------------------------------=
----
> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and =
their
> applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
> this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
--Apple-Mail=_E80EC39F-E0C5-4221-B9A7-F4C605887AC5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=utf-8
<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html =
charset=3Dutf-8"></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; =
-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div =
apple-content-edited=3D"true">I think you want to misunderstand me =
Andreas.</div><div apple-content-edited=3D"true"><br></div><div =
apple-content-edited=3D"true">It is astonishing arrogance to define the =
units because we in Bitcoin are used to</div><div =
apple-content-edited=3D"true">some wierd notation and ignore that the =
vast majority of population and </div><div =
apple-content-edited=3D"true"> financial software in =
existence does not have a notion of prices</div><div =
apple-content-edited=3D"true">with more than two =
decimals.</div><div apple-content-edited=3D"true"><br></div><div =
apple-content-edited=3D"true">With 1 bit =3D 100 satoshi, we would solve =
this problem for good. </div><div =
apple-content-edited=3D"true">Instead mBTC is a confusing step =
in-between.</div><div apple-content-edited=3D"true"><br style=3D"color: =
rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: medium; font-style: =
normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: =
normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; =
text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; =
word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; =
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; "><span style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); =
font-family: Helvetica; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; =
font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; =
line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: =
0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: =
0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; =
display: inline !important; float: none; ">Tamas Blummer</span><br =
style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: medium; =
font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; =
letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: =
-webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: =
normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; =
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; "><span style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); =
font-family: Helvetica; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; =
font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; =
line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: =
0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: =
0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; =
display: inline !important; float: none; "><a =
href=3D"http://bitsofproof.com">http://bitsofproof.com</a></span>
</div>
<br><div><div>On 14.03.2014, at 16:02, Andreas Schildbach <<a =
href=3D"mailto:andreas@schildbach.de">andreas@schildbach.de</a>> =
wrote:</div><br class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote =
type=3D"cite">By that definition 3.56 is a price. Maybe I misunderstood =
you and you're<br>lobbying for mBTC?<br><br><br>On 03/14/2014 03:57 PM, =
Tamas Blummer wrote:<br><blockquote type=3D"cite">you miss the point =
Andreas. It is not about the magnitude but about<br>the form of a =
price.<br><br>A number with no decimals or with two decimals is =
percieved as a<br>price in some currency. <br><br>A number with more =
than two decimals is just not percieved as a price<br>but as a geeky =
something that you rather convert to local currency.<br><br>Tamas =
Blummer<br>Bits of Proof<br><br>On 14.03.2014, at 15:49, Andreas =
Schildbach <<a =
href=3D"mailto:andreas@schildbach.de">andreas@schildbach.de</a><br><<a =
href=3D"mailto:andreas@schildbach.de">mailto:andreas@schildbach.de</a>>=
> wrote:<br><br><blockquote type=3D"cite">How much do you pay for an =
Espresso in your local currency?<br><br>At least for the Euro and the =
Dollar, mBTC 3.56 is very close to what<br>people would expect. =
Certainly more familiar than =C2=B5BTC 3558 or =
BTC<br>0.003578.<br><br>Anyway, I was just sharing real-world =
experience: nobody is confused.<br><br><br>On 03/14/2014 03:14 PM, Tamas =
Blummer wrote:<br><blockquote type=3D"cite">You give them a hard to =
interpret thing like mBTC and then wonder<br>why they rather look at =
local currency. Because the choices you<br>gave them are bad.<br><br>I =
think Bitcoin would have a better chance to be percieved as =
a<br>currency of its own if it had prices and fractions like =
currencies<br>do.<br><br>3.558 mBTC or 0.003578 BTC will never be as =
accepted as 3558 bits<br>would be.<br><br><br>Tamas Blummer Bits of =
Proof<br><br>On 14.03.2014, at 15:05, Andreas Schildbach <<a =
href=3D"mailto:andreas@schildbach.de">andreas@schildbach.de</a><br><<a =
href=3D"mailto:andreas@schildbach.de">mailto:andreas@schildbach.de</a>>=
><br>wrote:<br><br><blockquote type=3D"cite">btw. None of Bitcoin =
Wallet's users complained about confusion<br>because of the mBTC switch. =
In contrast, I get many mails and<br>questions if exchange rates happen =
to differ by >10%.<br><br>I suspect nobody looks at the Bitcoin =
price. It's the amount in<br>local currency that matters to the =
users.<br><br><br>On 03/13/2014 02:40 PM, Andreas Schildbach =
wrote:<br><blockquote type=3D"cite">Indeed. And users were crying for =
mBTC. Nobody was asking for<br>=C2=B5BTC.<br><br>I must admit I was not =
aware if this thread. I just watched<br>other wallets and at some point =
decided its time to switch to<br>mBTC.<br><br><br>On 03/13/2014 02:31 =
PM, Mike Hearn wrote:<br><blockquote type=3D"cite">The standard has =
become mBTC and that's what was adopted.<br>It's too late to try and =
sway this on a mailing list thread<br>now.<br><br><br>On Thu, Mar 13, =
2014 at 2:29 PM, Gary Rowe<br><<a =
href=3D"mailto:g.rowe@froot.co.uk">g.rowe@froot.co.uk</a> <<a =
href=3D"mailto:g.rowe@froot.co.uk">mailto:g.rowe@froot.co.uk</a>><br>&l=
t;<a =
href=3D"mailto:g.rowe@froot.co.uk">mailto:g.rowe@froot.co.uk</a>>> =
wrote:<br><br>The MultiBit HD view is that this is a =
locale-sensitive<br>presentation issue. As a result we offer a =
simple<br>configuration panel giving pretty much every =
possible<br>combination: icon, m+icon, =CE=BC+icon, BTC, mBTC, =
=CE=BCBTC, XBT,<br>mXBT, =CE=BCXBT, sat along with settings =
for leading/trailing<br>symbol, commas, spaces and points. This allows =
anyone to<br>customise to meet their own needs beyond the offered =
default.<br><br><br>We apply the NIST guidelines for representation of =
SI unit<br>symbols (i.e no conversion to native language, no RTL =
giving<br>icon+m etc).<br><br>Right now MultiBit HD is configured to use =
m+icon taken from<br>the Font Awesome icon set. However reading earlier =
posts it<br>seems that =CE=BC+icon is more sensible.<br><br>Let us know =
what you'd like.<br><br>Links: m+icon screenshot: <a =
href=3D"http://imgur.com/a/WCDoG">http://imgur.com/a/WCDoG</a> =
Font<br>Awesome icon:<br><a =
href=3D"http://fortawesome.github.io/Font-Awesome/icon/btc/">http://fortaw=
esome.github.io/Font-Awesome/icon/btc/</a> NIST SI<br>guidelines: <a =
href=3D"http://physics.nist.gov/Pubs/SP811/sec07.html">http://physics.nist=
.gov/Pubs/SP811/sec07.html</a><br><br><br>On 13 March 2014 12:56, Jeff =
Garzik <<a =
href=3D"mailto:jgarzik@bitpay.com">jgarzik@bitpay.com</a><br><<a =
href=3D"mailto:jgarzik@bitpay.com">mailto:jgarzik@bitpay.com</a>><br>&l=
t;<a =
href=3D"mailto:jgarzik@bitpay.com">mailto:jgarzik@bitpay.com</a>>> =
wrote:<br><br>Resurrecting this topic. Bitcoin Wallet moved to =
mBTC<br>several weeks ago, which was disappointing -- it sounded =
like<br>the consensus was uBTC, and moving to uBTC later --which =
will<br>happen-- may result in additional user confusion, thanks =
to<br>yet another decimal place =
transition.<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></block=
quote></blockquote><br><br><br>-------------------------------------------=
-----------------------------------<br>Learn Graph Databases - Download =
FREE O'Reilly Book<br>"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to =
graph databases and their<br>applications. Written by three acclaimed =
leaders in the field,<br>this first edition is now available. Download =
your free book today!<br><a =
href=3D"http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech">http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTe=
ch</a><br>_______________________________________________<br>Bitcoin-devel=
opment mailing =
list<br>Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net<br>https://lists.sourcef=
orge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development<br></blockquote></div><br></bo=
dy></html>=
--Apple-Mail=_E80EC39F-E0C5-4221-B9A7-F4C605887AC5--
--Apple-Mail=_949F0710-95DE-403E-8D03-D8FAE4AB9EE3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTIxxtAAoJEPZykcUXcTkcYi8H/jJeH9qJWEOLPOu/vVi+zS8k
V3uc2O4oSDPR/+kQNNIZR/jvLaKWAO8Psa6ebc3aZchLiCcK7G3kOBKXlV1HIEbb
E8f4oHfbQZ6E16MdK3YfvJJkdsHPxN5otVUA9pq4kS0NqzXkmaRhcGg3o8MgzQJC
vyBtpzPPaOM2QSeMTTNJ3xaOpdE9r2bSdsuEmzFQJBIWLfaeip9oT8D3Jr9R1VQz
B7yVVa9/IGXtl9zyWGBCtToAJ7GIpwlKFKDyEkM58hMqXX7oxissoaLBfmfgmXuD
sQKPgEsvE1rn/DixiZoz/W2k9cs7Y/4F4rF5pq2v5xcxY8T6jujWKYsx5snVMwU=
=VsJS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail=_949F0710-95DE-403E-8D03-D8FAE4AB9EE3--
|