1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
|
Return-Path: <rgrant@rgrant.org>
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DFA5C0032
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 26 Oct 2023 14:30:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069846F65E
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 26 Oct 2023 14:30:53 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 069846F65E
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id MsiptUkmg5yE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 26 Oct 2023 14:30:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ej1-f42.google.com (mail-ej1-f42.google.com
[209.85.218.42])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 231DD6143C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 26 Oct 2023 14:30:51 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 231DD6143C
Received: by mail-ej1-f42.google.com with SMTP id
a640c23a62f3a-9a6190af24aso163552166b.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 26 Oct 2023 07:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698330649; x=1698935449;
h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=WzVcSyySpT5oLIwQ5WcRY3RmmmHgBLs3dK4Fbbc8ig4=;
b=sHH1rG0jaGitHcJoDzlPmEiqk53Vg/+0PkWQw/ojqN3K960GHLU0+26XdKegoq7Npj
YTvZp6pK5FeNIIrFVPBs+rPbL0twDwOBAM/JbBC2HNFIOU37sDDNBQ7eCdw/wP5UZc2K
Z+aW5cI9Z2w1hHiO3Fr/QSdzBC02UUTXPvLrkpwxrosLX6cymdQqZP2MUDZRfzMmCQqL
nGT3Q/GclA9qhmbo80WjBID7L/u8BthLgnZbFQemYr/hYICWFP8RnOs0hhdjEnkkf1sc
JbU6kT/1HpdJqT3TF6Xr4PbNFi0eI+tZq9YFmJf4a2hly1B0T+ZAqkL5yC8+eL4tuUwK
C1Ww==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxzk6ZzfrxQNzPgBjxGKU9wh6GtL/jkfCCwXz3IQaPgM8r+RGo1
ct0iJIJ7B4u9JZWkI4vm8oqKqyPMhgN/AG3esF+bo2SJT8o9ZrkfxA4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG53Kv91mbpmdxcPCou0AcXKQ2QC2jUH9RG8c0Kc6y7eHPwkgj3uBZd9yr6/0IVNUWfA7yqJqK7tOZZVeUgj4M=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c144:b0:9c4:4226:e4e6 with SMTP id
dp4-20020a170906c14400b009c44226e4e6mr15576900ejc.66.1698330649217; Thu, 26
Oct 2023 07:30:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <194405691-79e11acd8b1dc1e2cdafc878b45b15c8@pmq3v.m5r2.onet>
In-Reply-To: <194405691-79e11acd8b1dc1e2cdafc878b45b15c8@pmq3v.m5r2.onet>
From: Ryan Grant <bitcoin-dev@rgrant.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 14:30:12 +0000
Message-ID: <CAMnpzfp3Df3SpE5+B5x2xYnjOWz+Q-BcRWdmotNhVO=-JDyTMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP for OP_CAT
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 14:30:53 -0000
I support OP_CAT, along with reasonable resource-consumption limiters.
Implementation as a UASF would help build confidence in that method.
I also support moving forward on other opcodes as soon as they are
known to be safe and maintainable; whether for introspection, tx
unpinning, or vaults.
|
