summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/45/0a57b507d2c750ef6090400c98561de4c1b189
blob: b56e48168874ea1fe64690e115cd57b54e9e1422 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
Return-Path: <marcel@jamin.net>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54F5A16F3
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu,  1 Oct 2015 09:41:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-yk0-f182.google.com (mail-yk0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.160.182])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B510CC
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu,  1 Oct 2015 09:41:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ykdt18 with SMTP id t18so73467903ykd.3
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 01 Oct 2015 02:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=HZBOJQ/ofjRNPD9itnTRg+IaK1KNKgCBi8iYWjksVv4=;
	b=aQbQR5WWe2mc+N8K+AqjidzjIUD/A8k8u1sJLUrcvXldHyY7YFpn9TvsOdan0hKJq8
	ybhBzbUtfyL9K+vARojNSG/cVWDiiuAJ+dVVH1m5gM4dP21LYrhGVh7p2YpUw2dc78Ww
	kv0O48Z42dnmjf+Zcdin0uBz9RqVTHiKZXLgaKF8/ChRe6DN85z8qxKMeHfxNzL2Dh0C
	483xCQs1CflwUd8IFWWFHj3U7JbpQpMt0BqQ1kEDWes7xq1C+3Nz1bj6c9ENa/KuL6Te
	L/CkLdt4aUOXby15rPS7lafTbYkJb/U6Yrnsl/biht7arZRVAz+XExQIR4W76uLLSc89
	hUIA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlh6PNh4vszvNlikm5c+Fg/ZHAHxHWDaaBr4gXvhuSTeTVqxpol2o+/IBkHyFKctB1ed6L8
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.170.173.1 with SMTP id p1mr6923419ykd.101.1443692485356;
	Thu, 01 Oct 2015 02:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.13.220.65 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 02:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAUq484+g89yD+s7iR_mGWPM3TTN7V6-EPb1ig=P1BKfcbztPg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20150924112555.GA21355@amethyst.visucore.com>
	<201509301757.44035.luke@dashjr.org>
	<20151001085058.GA10010@amethyst.visucore.com>
	<CAAUq486=TisNp0MbFjWYdCsyVX-qx5dV_KKZuNR7Jp63KNWeiQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADJgMzuDPoQacdrH7n_ajwuYLMZ4-Z19KZSa=w=rLhmOkJhfQg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAUq484+g89yD+s7iR_mGWPM3TTN7V6-EPb1ig=P1BKfcbztPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 11:41:25 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAUq4861Wd2c42gVy7SoW9414R8RGY+Yzp7rDtzagrwQewnFWg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Marcel Jamin <marcel@jamin.net>
To: Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ac044c1652e052107d973
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Fwd:  Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 release schedule
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 09:41:27 -0000

--001a113ac044c1652e052107d973
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Marcel Jamin <marcel@jamin.net>
Date: 2015-10-01 11:39 GMT+02:00
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 release schedule
To: Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com>


I guess the question then becomes why bitcoin still is <1.0.0

I'd say it's safe to say that it's used in production.

2015-10-01 11:17 GMT+02:00 Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com>:

> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> Any particular reason bitcoin versioning doesn't follow the SemVer spec?
>>
>
> We do: a.b.c, the next major version is, 0.12.0, and maintenance releases
> are 0.12.1 etc. Release candidates are 0.12.0-rc1 for example.
>

--001a113ac044c1652e052107d973
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded messag=
e ----------<br>From: <b class=3D"gmail_sendername">Marcel Jamin</b> <span =
dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:marcel@jamin.net">marcel@jamin.net</a>&gt=
;</span><br>Date: 2015-10-01 11:39 GMT+02:00<br>Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] =
Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 release schedule<br>To: Btc Drak &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:=
btcdrak@gmail.com">btcdrak@gmail.com</a>&gt;<br><br><br><div dir=3D"ltr">I =
guess the question then becomes why bitcoin still is &lt;1.0.0<div><br></di=
v><div>I&#39;d say it&#39;s safe to say that it&#39;s used in production.</=
div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2015-10=
-01 11:17 GMT+02:00 Btc Drak <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:btcdra=
k@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">btcdrak@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span>:<br><blockq=
uote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc =
solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div cl=
ass=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Marcel Jamin via bitco=
in-dev <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfound=
ation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt;<=
/span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8=
ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">Any partic=
ular reason bitcoin versioning doesn&#39;t follow the SemVer spec?</div></b=
lockquote><div><br></div><div>We do: a.b.c, the next major version is, 0.12=
.0, and maintenance releases are 0.12.1 etc. Release candidates are 0.12.0-=
rc1 for example.</div></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
</div><br></div>

--001a113ac044c1652e052107d973--