1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1YzUTj-0005G3-KZ
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 01 Jun 2015 18:30:27 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.212.180 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.212.180; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
helo=mail-wi0-f180.google.com;
Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com ([209.85.212.180])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1YzUTi-0001SN-LZ
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 01 Jun 2015 18:30:27 +0000
Received: by wibut5 with SMTP id ut5so46571803wib.1
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Mon, 01 Jun 2015 11:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.9.161 with SMTP id a1mr28825134wjb.39.1433183420620;
Mon, 01 Jun 2015 11:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.143.9 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 11:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAEz79PqGJ5XSMUbWVQOQ6DjJqbqHmad6t37RUX9Zz=2k4HJK3Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BAY403-EAS318194A3B22E4C5D5FE559DC2B60@phx.gbl>
<CAEz79PqGJ5XSMUbWVQOQ6DjJqbqHmad6t37RUX9Zz=2k4HJK3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 20:30:20 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: SsJFFwX0NGKslOwna4qS5L7-DTY
Message-ID: <CANEZrP1DT2VB9kNLCTXExVXwWkPFSar0GhbvhY9Wfz+H1Xx2gw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: "Warren Togami Jr." <wtogami@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d34faaf2543051779045e
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1YzUTi-0001SN-LZ
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 18:30:27 -0000
--047d7b5d34faaf2543051779045e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I don't see this as an issue of sensitivity or not. Miners are businesses
that sell a service to Bitcoin users - the service of ordering transactions
chronologically. They aren't charities.
If some miners can't provide the service Bitcoin users need any more, then
OK, they should not/cannot mine. Lots of miners have come and gone since
Bitcoin started as different technology generations came and went. That's
just business.
--047d7b5d34faaf2543051779045e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">I don't see this as an issue of sensitivity or not. Mi=
ners are businesses that sell a service to Bitcoin users - the service of o=
rdering transactions chronologically. They aren't charities.<div><br></=
div><div>If some miners can't provide the service Bitcoin users need an=
y more, then OK, they should not/cannot mine. Lots of miners have come and =
gone since Bitcoin started as different technology generations came and wen=
t. That's just business.</div></div>
--047d7b5d34faaf2543051779045e--
|
