1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
|
Return-Path: <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E824B721
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:26:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ua0-f180.google.com (mail-ua0-f180.google.com
[209.85.217.180])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ED8013B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:26:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ua0-f180.google.com with SMTP id l94so35582118ual.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to; bh=OKFMkaD1R8R23W5tqhb7lHqr1fv72zpf7JDzdlh7BRU=;
b=Vu92N+1EwydTLV5MiaEURcBi3Od7L1GLeXNTxL/Nu/uPdaKd4cjMxrYSXWJxmg4/Mt
gHKxvoCoMnEORi0XlrFJ4YuLpsM5Pf8N7FYaSDiOv4JpfOLyT7/y3w6aGRYyWDAuuzj5
KwFzbLdcAHo8SQncabUNYpmYurCRxW5YQW4i4MCH/o4gfeXfS4gE+f1Vrk+BnpyqixBZ
stSRL2DGNHa2EtRzfzJCinWbKxE3gMyJLBYXAqDIQeU0OG/WRlXCUKj3BO0wkZl7XQXc
OpaMgBs96+wGs/hvVytK4wIm/tia2OZI0TL69G1naySi9JM7OD19RNmCRLow1jBmtOWW
IXxQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=OKFMkaD1R8R23W5tqhb7lHqr1fv72zpf7JDzdlh7BRU=;
b=Tcc6eMjoVRftrFrkNLFuS4IskE7BJMNwLyEIHkXDlRUM6oIOLRONqYfLmE8P8rioRR
rmkyBd0Lu5vlRtTIsObri1B5/ou7a91rtj9ddZDfeI3bj05InrzCSaF6YuLlwtut1K9G
g2B3w94j973K2mCJZ07a1usF+J79IYQezsM1byEbCaJn9b/kDs41Y2oAjcWyeWcytc3t
XPkKK4RUcTH+GMxU7+Fmz7bcfatxK0nWFvDscm3DRUGBDKvfEOm2qNsMNZDMcRv5z3bo
4Se+OptwV1nO042EG/2nCch3GlH6XeUPOnGmsYtp5oHA4JI8KWEcXKeXrhPlNNEeCncK
YtWQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwO5cbBaZumOzI5acCKYDzX2bRJXnDF1DFbpc/GT+9vhs9kARiCJCK4gZiEmX0GdqkE+nyKm9y1i4KbsPw==
X-Received: by 10.176.68.226 with SMTP id n89mr5529271uan.98.1472149582616;
Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:26:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: gmaxwell@gmail.com
Received: by 10.103.118.69 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160825142732.GA11295@nex>
References: <20160824014634.GA19905@fedora-21-dvm>
<CAH+Axy4ahvQOG5=jGn68u0m5dTTmFCJ0isfOEt-Be=63ot55dg@mail.gmail.com>
<20160825142732.GA11295@nex>
From: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:26:21 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: clHMX3ieNoiXrIk9jyuJFqjf580
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgRTgymPn+YU61N0rR=PRkQbsUHxXt6RySqJbGTCjwuWMg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Capital Efficient Honeypots w/ "Scorched Earth"
Doublespending Protection
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:26:24 -0000
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Christian Decker via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> If however
> he is planning to use it as a foothold to further compromise your
> company, send spam or similar, he will likely try to avoid these
> tripwires. [...]
Depends on the value of their activity compared to the value of the coins.
Spamming doesn't pay much.
Covert tripwires would obviously be better, but if shared tripwires
allow you to have 100x the funds available it could be a good
trade-off.
|
