1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
|
Return-Path: <naama.kates@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E6202058
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 6 Oct 2015 20:14:31 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com (mail-pa0-f53.google.com
[209.85.220.53])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CADF188
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 6 Oct 2015 20:14:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by padhy16 with SMTP id hy16so79407440pad.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 06 Oct 2015 13:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
bh=GGY6GqI8HIyu6dtlmUc3Hu72zdYv3SZAaCdlHjjIncI=;
b=kQFWITeDL5kabqdU/cJZbgIw+uxJgmaXzE3gN+G+loxBTS5dA/WKJCfavtwoGqz5TG
d0/SjqIziLFpYCue9h2N1M+nn/r9jKfJhr1vYyZ/2rnoEificKiXsMrex2cg8+knEb1l
4Fsvl8Vs8vSO2beR0CIOvmUrTWkucIAymBjxAGjshRNFriJp5oP2BBUhWy6l9OnxTeOc
s5/9FCMIemSybXET8W+18SM7D1jLfx4A/Lp1XOx/cB6Ui6yBY03sIVwuXtAJ8x6gHIbh
o98ancgXsK53wQJ9UYiAVYW8CJ+LQ/i13+KWqzLe6cmpAtTmguiaysDefsOatgS6i7pe
3g+A==
X-Received: by 10.66.163.136 with SMTP id yi8mr49054851pab.124.1444162470799;
Tue, 06 Oct 2015 13:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.6] (cpe-76-91-152-174.socal.res.rr.com.
[76.91.152.174]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
tp6sm35039416pbc.81.2015.10.06.13.14.29
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Tue, 06 Oct 2015 13:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=Apple-Mail-BD524F2F-5F99-4014-AFAF-83EFCAFEED2D
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: naama.kates@gmail.com
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12A405)
In-Reply-To: <CAOVG1oNimYpzSnB7NUuugagufbD1JnZmAWsuXhMjq45dEF=w-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 13:14:28 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E8AC44C1-310F-44AE-AB5E-63064A3DE1BE@gmail.com>
References: <CAOVG1oNimYpzSnB7NUuugagufbD1JnZmAWsuXhMjq45dEF=w-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Byron Gibson <byron@mirror.co>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin network simulation testing?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 20:14:31 -0000
--Apple-Mail-BD524F2F-5F99-4014-AFAF-83EFCAFEED2D
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Byron,=20
I've been using shadow a bit-- I think these simulators are important for te=
sting, but Shadow, at least, certainly seems to have limitations, in some cr=
ucial respects. Running shadow w Tor (which is only logical, because many B=
CT transactions transpire over Tor) is not as 'light' as presented and slows=
my own box down quite a bit, so the stats can't possibly be accurate... I d=
on't know if this answers any questions or if you've had this experience at a=
ll -- perhaps it is negligible on a more powerful machine than my own-- or p=
erhaps there is an adjustment still unaccounted?
Regards,
Nina K
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 4, 2015, at 2:04 PM, Byron Gibson via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@list=
s.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>=20
> Hi all, is anyone using simulators like Shadow (https://shadow.github.io),=
BTCSim (https://github.com/btcsuite/btcsim), etc. to test proposed changes t=
o Bitcoin? I have a few questions about their capabilities and limitations.=
>=20
> Byron Gibson
> http://mirror.co/
> https://keybase.io/byrongibson
>=20
> =20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
--Apple-Mail-BD524F2F-5F99-4014-AFAF-83EFCAFEED2D
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3D=
utf-8"></head><body dir=3D"auto"><div>Hi Byron, </div><div><br></div><d=
iv>I've been using shadow a bit-- I think these simulators are important for=
testing, but Shadow, at least, certainly seems to have limitations, in some=
crucial respects. Running shadow w Tor (which is only logical, becaus=
e many BCT transactions transpire over Tor) is not as 'light' as presented a=
nd slows my own box down quite a bit, so the stats can't possibly be accurat=
e... I don't know if this answers any questions or if you've had this experi=
ence at all -- perhaps it is negligible on a more powerful machine than my o=
wn-- or perhaps there is an adjustment still unaccounted?</div><div><br></di=
v><div>Regards,</div><div>Nina K</div><div><br>Sent from my iPhone</div><div=
><br>On Oct 4, 2015, at 2:04 PM, Byron Gibson via bitcoin-dev <<a href=3D=
"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfounda=
tion.org</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div><p dir=3D=
"ltr">Hi all, is anyone using simulators like Shadow (<a href=3D"https://sha=
dow.github.io">https://shadow.github.io</a>), BTCSim (<a href=3D"https://git=
hub.com/btcsuite/btcsim">https://github.com/btcsuite/btcsim</a>), etc. to te=
st proposed changes to Bitcoin? I have a few questions about their cap=
abilities and limitations.<br></p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Byron Gibson<br>
<a href=3D"http://mirror.co/">http://mirror.co/</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://keybase.io/byrongibson">https://keybase.io/byrongibson</a=
><br></p>
<p dir=3D"ltr"> </p>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div><span>____________________=
___________________________</span><br><span>bitcoin-dev mailing list</span><=
br><span><a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-de=
v@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a></span><br><span><a href=3D"https://lists.lin=
uxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev">https://lists.linuxfoundation=
.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></=
html>=
--Apple-Mail-BD524F2F-5F99-4014-AFAF-83EFCAFEED2D--
|
